Yes, thanks, I read about it. But what other option? Attributing a Silaeva? Maybe. Although I think that the force will soon send to the author. But all the forum will not say anything else except "I (almost) 100 percent sure that it Kalinin. So I just said it. It was obvious. But who will give papers on authorship? I? Igor Sasha? Thus, again we return to Silaev. And if Valeri will give atributatsiyu, pictures surrender to the auction, and there - see the story on the first link?
Since I was such a strange example, better access to the author, wait, what he says.
Assume there will be a piece of data laid out the pictures. Its all be considered. Someone may say: yes, it Kalinin. Someone may say: well, yes, certainly Kalinin. It would give the owner? These words have been uttered. Next, what? John Preston, too, was absolutely sure of the authorship, and look how it turned.
Well, or there is a way out: keep painting until such time as their creator will go into another world, much farther to confirm.
There were mixed two completely different issues. First, the original question was (quote): whose job? Answer: probably Kalinin. And so began a discussion on the second question: whether the original picture? Were given some interesting facts. And now at this moment, I believe, go to the third question: how to testify authorship documented? I gave my recommendation. Next business owner - to follow them or not.
|