Цитата:
Сообщение от artcol
In some works of art of the Soviet period there is a certain self-identity and it's really interesting in all plans, including and investment.
|
I do not think that in some, but most of the papers, they just can not see who they endorse, where books on this periudu, store shelves are full, Vangogami, Renoir, etc.. but what you can find it the crumbs and then buk.magazinam that produced in the union. Soviet art had not yet fired, someone should pull the trigger. Others here can not shoot at the Russian Art, ends gunpowder. After all, look around Soviet art in difitsite, which sells the Soviet 40-60s, so the fortieth markups ever seen.
Цитата:
Сообщение от artcol
Yes, that's it - We buy (ie pay money) to the exhibitions. To get to the exhibition had to pass the Fair. In vystavkome were daring artists?
|
No, not bold, but they were 2-3, or even one, but rather bold personality (Authoritative people) who, even superficially, and their professionalism, whose voice was more important than half of all votes. I'm one who sits, sechas not be brave, in any case. I remembered one stihotrorenie, excerpt (Time, so ruthlessly to the brave and innocent).
Цитата:
Сообщение от artcol
Yes, there was a period in the history of the world isikustva and domestic. Was, and all went out. Do not become the Soviet system - was not and Soviet art. The experiment failed, the curtain.
|
That there should be names of artists, director, theater and music to say that A Schnittke, Rachmaninov, it failed exeperimental?