Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 24.10.2010, 15:09 Язык оригинала: Русский       #104
Гуру
 
Аватар для fabosch
 
Регистрация: 06.04.2010
Адрес: Санкт-Петербург
Сообщений: 1,283
Спасибо: 3,923
Поблагодарили 4,953 раз(а) в 992 сообщениях
Репутация: 9945
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от tchaika Посмотреть сообщение
Remember a young Glinka, who loved Italian music. In 1830 he went to Italy to study there and become an Italian composer. And tried. And then realized that he could not write Italian music that lives in it something else, other melodies it is born. Then he went to Germany where he became acquainted with Berlioz, and went on to study at the same time, it is fully aware that he - Russian composer. He returned to Russia, Russian composer.

The issue is sensitive and attentive attitude to their roots. Someone else's are addicted to those who have a soul, seems to have nothing, who have nothing to regret and nothing to lose. Neglect their name in someone else's finished - a speculative idea.

And here at Claude Monet had a lot to lose. It took all of his native air. He managed to find this new section of the same French nature and treat it like no other. In this - selfless love of nature, and not strangers freaks.

And next to it worked mighty and unique artists.

But Pushkin as written in "remote village". "How ironic that the confinement in the village of St. Michael has brought extraordinary benefits: the end of" Gypsy, "continued Eugene Onegin, Boris Godunov," Graf Nulin "and the most famous samples of his love lyrics».
It seems to me You do not quite understand. More precisely, I'm not quite clearly written.
The meaning of what I tried to say that in Russian culture, a huge number of loans (in fact, as in many other cultures), but it all melted into something that absolutely quirky and do not repeat. This is completely original and very colorful culture - the national to the roots. Russian culture is absolutely not afraid of borrowing. They are afraid of the culture of the weak, not having a bright originality. But in our culture such power that she was not scared - she's purge of its pot and make their own. And when I wrote about a remote village, I had in mind that should not be afraid of borrowing and influence. We are only helping to develop their own. Pushkin, who was sitting in the village, was a highly educated Russian intelligentsia, absorbed the European culture, but refers to her not as a model for imitation, but as "dung" (sorry for this haunting image, he is right do not mean anything bad ), where better to grow flowers that besides manure fed also by common people and culture, from the Russian language and Russian are the colors of it, despite the "European dung."



fabosch вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 2 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо fabosch за это полезное сообщение:
I-V (24.10.2010), Peter (24.10.2010)