[Ольга Озолина]

Сообщение от K-Maler

I do not remember exactly, but like to remove yourself from this list, you need to write a written statement ... I do not think that there is "a bribe" ...

Yes, you need to write an application in person. Do not think of the bureaucracy, but there have been cases when the artists as to settle scores among themselves - have written to us from foreign entities such statements .

In general, we have the entire history of EXP (11 years) was 3 (three), real personal statement (2 painter and a sculptor) on how to no longer be printed in EXP.
 
We have every right not to respond to those statements. I quote what is written on our website under "Questions and Answers:
http://rating.artunion.ru/faq.htm

Question. I am an artist. For various reasons I do not like what my name was mentioned in the "Unified Arts rating. What should I do?

Response. Draw an analogy with any publication in the media: if, for example, the newspaper wants to write about you and assess your creativity, you forbid her to do this is impossible (Federal Law "On Mass Media"). A periodic directory "A single feature ranking" is registered as mass media.

In the regulations written here that:
http://rating.artunion.ru/normativ1.htm

Statements by the deletion of the artist from the Uniform artistic rating, not normally regarded as Rating Center has the right to include artists in the unique artistic rating and assign the rating category in its sole discretion (see paragraph 17). Freedom of rating the center is protected by the Russian Constitution and the laws "On Trade Unions, Their Rights and Guarantees» (№ 10-FZ of 12.01.1996), and "On mass media» (№ 2124-1 from 27.12.1991, the ).

But nonetheless, we are all satisfied with these 3 statements. These artists in EXP is no longer mentioned.

Could, of course, say that "the squad said the loss fighter, but will not, because frankly sympathize with these three. They came in the wake of its own (absolutely not understandable to me) ambitions and lost a very important tool for their "presentation" to the public and to future generations. Whether we like it or not, but our time in art in the future will be evaluated including on exp.
It is unlikely that I'll say on this subject better than A. Cantor:
http://rating.artunion.ru/article11.htm

These ratings are required in every gallery, every museum - everywhere buy and sell works of art. Such ratings exist in the scientific institutes, academies, at art centers. Here they are called the ratings and usually wear a "party" in nature, they are based - the division of artists into "us" and "strangers" to "those" and "other" to "traditional" and "modern." From the perspective of art and its history of this division is meaningless, but it defended furiously and uncompromising zeal, because without it the existence of "centers" is meaningless and indefensible. Hence all the fuss because of the rating.

Meanwhile, it is split on the art of the "party" calls for a common rating, does not know the parties and trends. This suggests a long time, especially because of the schism can not write the history of art, no exposition of how to arrange, nor sell or buy at a reasonable price.

Another reason for the rating: in Moscow, as should not even know the art of St. Petersburg, although the art of Russia as a whole, without St Petersburg was not, there can be. But if the artists of St. Petersburg, evil is, well there, but once known, the art of the Urals, Siberia, Chernozem, North, Volga seemed non-existent, despite the fact that the Russian secondary cities live and work (unfortunately, and die unrecognized), many of the largest master art of today's Russia.

To a large extent it relates to the former Soviet republics. When they became independent powers in the society of these countries to keep the illusion that the new links with Europe, Asia and America will reimburse the broken ties with Moscow and St. Petersburg. These illusions are dissipated very quickly. It soon became clear that the Soviet Union of Artists of each republic to know how his, and loved him like his, were taken to the international exhibitions, but now for any exhibition paying in dollars, which the artist a bit. The new authorities are not rich enough to support the arts, and prefer to blame all their troubles of the former Soviet masters and Russian neighbors. Previously, each interesting product became known vast country, arguing about it, he drove from town to town and abroad. Just as quickly, though through other channels, to disseminate information about the artists, "nonconformist".

Now any artist working without a response. Rating need a huge number of artists is greater than away from the city he lived.

Posted 7 minutes

Сообщение от fabosch

Yes, easily. Magpie - a great artist, one of my favorites. Does he would lower the rating if it was a nobleman? If you set rating, focusing on it, sorry ... .
I can understand that the forty could not become a good artist, if not experienced anything that had to endure. And even then, that we still can not know - or maybe vice versa, would do a Russian artist number 1. History fortunately (unfortunately) does not know the subjunctive mood.
All these stories of personal tragedies, with ears cut off to the public need to lure her to give us something to a museum instead of "couch and a box".

Well, not the aristocratic art of Magpies, however. With this something you agree? Do not want to delve here into questions of philosophy of art, and I'm not strong in them, but it is sure: the perception of works of art out of context, age and personality is impossible. This is the basics of modern art history.
Tear Black Square by Malevich from the context of the era and the personality - so any artist category 5B write such a picture is not worse, yet smoother draw box