Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 14.09.2010, 20:33 Язык оригинала: Русский       #2
Бывалый
 
Аватар для chealex
 
Регистрация: 05.08.2010
Адрес: Украина
Сообщений: 285
Спасибо: 557
Поблагодарили 759 раз(а) в 173 сообщениях
Репутация: 1517
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Samvel Посмотреть сообщение
Sometimes of course puts me, and do not understand simple things, but here again, it did not understand. Why look for 1954 and 1964, and then 1989. (For example, was born in 1920, and a member of the Soviet Union, began in 1950) found a topic where talking about it. http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...891 & page = 3
R, by the way, my. It is ruled by both sides, just a directory of 1989 - is one of the options to determine the 25-30-year members of the SC, because when the directory - it is born in 1958 was 30 years (one year, give to the preparation of the book). Of course, your options are possible (eg born in 1920, and a member of the Soviet Union, began in 1950). You just need to take other directories. I have a 1968 for interest watched the first 500 members of the SC and of these only 5 - born in 1938 (Ie 30-year-olds) and 1-1940 born and the majority of applied arts. The one that the ratio is almost 1 /100.



chealex вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо chealex за это полезное сообщение:
Самвел (14.09.2010)