Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 13.08.2010, 20:05 Язык оригинала: Русский       #1
Гуру
 
Аватар для Pavel
 
Регистрация: 13.02.2009
Сообщений: 7,384
Спасибо: 3,976
Поблагодарили 4,028 раз(а) в 1,687 сообщениях
Репутация: -2
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Fed Посмотреть сообщение
Medvedev, a naive artist, they have main-expressiveness. You can not have them in order of size.
The last I brought Cartney Degas. He was, as you can see, too, can be with someone "pushing", but not likely, many give up such a picture at home, even without a signature.
  In the meantime, I know artists honored with merit, and "boring" pictures of the bargain, which simply do not need anyone. That's me to the fact that one of the advantages of the Medvedev-its apparent consumer qualities.
And about the techniques and visions of various artists again everything will go to the debate and not return.
But there's just different. So have a look that is taken from the other can still be seen and so void. His then-nothing. A Pirosmani all his, all his own way. Also the Van Gogh-all his own.
Emptiness is the worst thing for an artist.
France has Nyvna style and is very good work.



Pavel вне форума   Ответить с цитированием