Цитата:
Сообщение от Artem
The original can be specifically reduced, the signature can tear straight from the original or a reduced copies.
|
Yes, everything can be done. But this is not seen the slightest sense. Why should "tear" on the copy when you can take it very? Why work with a pencil, making a copy of a copy when you can simply perefotografirovat? And it will be better and more accurate. Meaning?
But the signature "tear" generally safe. Well, the artist's signature is not so important in this case as the signature of Montgomery. Compare with the genuineness of the signature (see attachment). "Pulling" a signature ... Yes this "artist," I think then it would be under martial law would be planted in full. And after the war, few would have been, because Montgomery was not only charismatic figure, a knight of all the higher orders of the Allied powers (including the Soviet Order of Victory), but he was after the war, the highest positions in the Armed Forces of Great Britain and NATO.
Now if you really "pulling" on the copy, then perhaps, with a copy of the portrait rather than his thumbnail. From then she took the date of writing, which is the portrait not? Its very few people knew. By the way, this date is confirmed in the unpublished diaries of Edward printing Ardizzona (Edward Ardizzone, 1900 - 1979), a full-time painter 8 th Army, the text is in the network.
Incidentally, the figure right part of the face model (left figure), and chin - darker than the portrait. There is a noticeable difference in the badges, particularly in the Middle. There is also, it is in stereo well in sight. No, I do not think that this "draloskop.
Цитата:
Сообщение от Artem
Someone is needed for someone or something.
|
Agree, that your argument hardly seems convincing.