Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 27.03.2010, 19:47 Язык оригинала: Русский       #1304
Banned
 
Регистрация: 17.02.2010
Адрес: Ukraine , Kiev
Сообщений: 333
Спасибо: 166
Поблагодарили 394 раз(а) в 180 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 24
Репутация: 789
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Pavel Посмотреть сообщение
I can tell how the State can get income from trading on the art. This is a tax on the sale of each item. Ask a purchase. In England the tax of 50%. If the tax is 35%sdkelat ....
To start, the State must do something for the domestic arts.
But I assure you that this is fiction. Always our art standing alone. We came up with his idols - which are also for the domestic market. You do not wake deny that Kirkorov Bilan demand in the West? So all that is associated with art. Although you can create and maintain any direction in the art and it is booming in the world. But who does not.
I assure you that we take in the west - as a source of income, not as different. Why is that? Because everywhere and all - every man for himself.
Each imagines himself a genius - but why, then it's genius runs in the domestic space. I have often compared the approach to the art for them and us. Very big difference. What can I say, if the bulk of artists do not generate ideas - and try to repeat the already made to them *
No fair and not biased estimates of the artist - though where he is, even if our critics cite, and pores over Western art. His vision is not and just do not have a mechanism for the movement of its own product.



noart вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 5 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо noart за это полезное сообщение:
artcol (27.03.2010), L-ana64110 (27.03.2010), Pavel (28.03.2010), Yurko (28.03.2010)