Terminology
 

I meet with the news site example.: " Many of the paintings and prints adorned the ... ".

In Russian, there is a relatively stable, the term "printmaking", in order that the Anglo-Americans call "print". I am somewhat warps calked transfer to a specialized site on the art.

Estamp also borrowed the word. But agree, blee usual. Problem is. Sometimes deysvitelno warps overindulgence anglonimami. It was then when it is in no way justified. But I do not know it, the case or not? We need to think ...

Not only the terminology. What is the difference?
 

In British terminology, in addition to the words «print» there are «serigraph». In some editions of serigraph is treated as a synonym of silk, although there is the term «silkscreen».

As correctly: serigraph = print or serigraph = silkscreen? Or all three the same?

This is silkscreen.
A
that is, when there is a signature by hand and put a few strokes to Every item in this series differed.
Though something, and then print a frame with a stretched silk, well, as do screen printing.
I so vseda considered.

The fact of the matter is that today there is a fairly stable, the term " print "and" Print "did not hear that now, would someone say.

No, engravers still call prints.
Print for myself called machine print reproduction.

COP, and I just wondered, because some publications (and directories included) use the word "serigraph" in the value of silk, and some "silkscreen".
I would like to "feel the difference."

Another asked many questions about "Lithography," which just opened.

I say "engraving", "etchings". "Print", also mainly use for machine printing.

Yes, in general, the word "printmaking" call all the prints.
Just one time the word was fashionable.

Yes, in general, no, because as far as I know, engraving from Ofori different, as "vpukloe mapping is convex. So, probably, woodcut engravings from copper (metals) is complicated processing.
And that is tlichaet them from lithography.
Or wrong?