Help evaluate masterpieces
 

A more precise - I interested in your arguments than paintings Ukrainian art revolutionaries better or worse, their creations aponentov.
I propose to do this by the example of these pictures of 4 different artists (two from each side):
from left to right: the first two - this is revolutionary.

The first two are not "pictures" and poluamatorskaya magazine chart. With Vlada Ralko compare them as ethically as a tricycle, for example, with the Porsche.

Continue interesting

[color="# 666686"]Added after 5 minutes[/color]
Guided by the data commented first Saladora Dali, Leonardo Da Vinci, Mondrian and Vazarelli, Ivan Marchuk can be attributed to the same - ie in poluamatorskuyu magazine schedule.

Unfortunately, can not say anything. I-artekspert, not a psychiatrist.

Continue interesting

ArtExpert, Ilya Kabakov (with all its ambiguity) is very accurately observed: "The prices for the artist, in principle, are the result of market manipulation. It says nothing about the value of work. Elected by the very few characters in each generation, five - six, for various reasons - rarely works, the strangeness of the work. Not that this is necessarily a good artist. They are chosen by dealers on the basis of market. purely capitalist manipulation. How about this? As for life under capitalism in general. There are pluses, there are downsides.
I would say that the "strangeness" of the first two works, to put it mildly, does not excite

A further well noted Emilia Kabakov: should not be in it too much to believe, as believed, for example, Damien Hirst. He seems to be doing right, but it seemed to him that he had correctly played the market, that now can do everything. (c)
By the way:
http://dev.openspace.ru/art/names/details/3023/page2/

Cyril Syzransky, thank you! but note, she said it a few days before the solo Hirst auction, the success of which does not believe it. Results solo auction you, Cyril, are known.
Would you like to work, which posted ArtExpert?

And what and where?

Cyril Syzransky, at the top:)

Understand, the first two.
For a modern fashionable interior, as a spot-possible.

The first two pictures - trying to pull out of the chaos some orderly manner, the work of "streamlining improvisation." Two others - the opposite of the images to create chaos, such as "destroyed ordering. The principal difference is in these papers do not see. Maybe the last made more relaxed, and the first internal look more organized. I think every artist is entitled to have their own style and their fans. The fact is some mental notes of the artist affect his paintings. Here, all 4 me personally, nothing moves. Maybe someone to blow themselves the wisdom, history, remember the names, prices, regalia, etc. and demonstrates the advantages of one over the other. Hardly a sound convincing. Read this, it would be interesting.