Sketch "bring an icon," the XIX-XX
 

Etude . Bear icon. The turn of XIX-XX. Oil on canvas. 13.5 x24
From the collection of Ivan Mikhailovich Kozminykh - Lanin , a social scientist . Author of numerous works on factory statistics of the Moscow province .
Similar to many. The numbers on the back of the exhibition clearly . Can anyone have any suggestions ? Thanks in advance.

Hand, training school - felt.

Perhaps some of the students Repin.

This topic http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=7665, too many "rooms" on the back .. "pictures."

Clever.
Here, this normal study, which would be nice to return to the author.
And you are transferring the theme to the spread of low-quality cheap imitations.

 Rooms are not there . And here the work of an entirely different level.
Probably right Guriev , Igor - it looks like a student essay Repin, if not his own
That is , about meeting Ivan Mikhailovich Kozminykh - Lanin is not very clear .
Where such a picture could show during the Soviet vlasti7 and where he was Ivan Mikhailovich after 1918 ?

Repin, his " Procession ," conceived in 1877 in Chuguev , where it began and is the first version [1] , there is a subsequent designs (see " Religious Procession in the oak forest. Appearance of the icon ," 1878) [2] .
But as Repin in the 77th has not yet written , like, so he began to sketch in such a "fast " manner later , after a trip to Paris in 1883 was (see his " The annual memorial rally at the Wall of the Communards in Pere Lachaise in Paris, " from TG) [3]. Or write? He has such quick studies ? By "Sadko" like , no?
Although he is " Summer landscape in the province of Kursk " in 1881 - c /m , 14h20 - preparatory sketch for " procession " [4]. It is interesting to compare to them .
Bring to the sketch of an icon of a monastery. The icon itself resembles that Repin tolerate [5].
If we take the version of the authorship of Repin, to look for images of places around the Kursk, thence to watch the monasteries with entrance gates.
That's right, thinking out loud . :)>

intart1, we can look at pictures of this end of the plywood?

Do not pull at all.
Who ? Chahrov ? Kustodiev ? Buchkuri ? Murashko or Valentin Serov ? Who do we remember these artists had not only the prospect of huge concepts , etc., but also aesthetics , culture swab. None of that shown in the paper.
Take a look , compare .
Actually , the feeling - a remake .

but perhaps in red on the back is not signed?

And much like the famous artist's signature :)>

Agreed. Maybe not a remake , just - Study shtudenta . Very weak painting ( s).

Then.
What is written in ink on the back - not a remake.
Nothing.
The modern human hands under a calligraphy not sharpened.

There seems nothing is written.
With membership - do not understand.

Who, when and why he wrote that belongs to the professor?
The professor himself?

red top - hotel room facing the letter "J" for her signature , much like one of the sample signatures Tsionglinskogo .
Numbers like these , I have seen in the sketches Tsionglinskogo - a huge posthumous exhibition of 1914 .
Painting does not.
However, we must carefully compare the signature. Sitting in the country, you will not find anything at hand .

Absolutely agree.
Also drew attention to handwriting.

What an unusual hand you make out?
Who and when do you say?