fross,
50%of the 100%mark-up:)

Discount
 

to do their thing until the purchase price, to persuade the client to "give a much give, and then after the new year will give a half," as well and buy if you offer a super thing for a ridiculous price (once in 5 below the market), only then buy ...

For that - then:)

But take an example from Sandro. All go to you, although probably better after the new year - then all will be a gift.:)

But seriously, my impression of the buyer: no more good proposals have not yet become, nor the price of the good things is not what did not drop - not even move.

I did not see certain things I can not judge, but I will only say that the inscription on the work of Goncharova larionov occurs quite often - they are almost always exhibited together, and gallery owners ticked work Zolotinskaya her husband's name, not to get confused. This is a known history, so that the mere presence of such labels does not bother you.

You're right, but here in addition to the signature at the still life ML, on the back of the canvas two more signature hand Larionov ...: confused:

[color="# 666686"]Added after 5 minutes[/color]
Yesterday I was offered a job Nesterova (oil), exactly half the price than a month ago and a lot of other good deals in high-end segment of the market.

Please read the entire list.

I understand unnecessarily rude becomes fashionable. Well go on ...

Sale Goncharova as no surprise. In its authenticity, I believe much more than in the authenticity of Exter. In fact, Kharlamov at the same auction sold for 700 thousand pounds, it is not enough??? and on Bonamse work Kharlamova were rather weak and very expensive ... The reduction of consumer activity, of course, is obvious. Consumers have become more thorough approach to the selection of items and their prices, but sales have not stood up completely. And the results of past auctions confirm this, selected mainly best things. So what to think?

Larionov, Goncharova
 

About the still life - if I understood correctly, then Sandro, said that the still life Larionov, Goncharova was given for still life, because sales are more profitable. based on the fact that it is valued more.
But things were a bit as worthy, and left.
Masterpieces of the lot does not happen!

And the results of past auctions confirm this, selected mainly best things. So what to think?

Think, I think, is that the results of the same Sotheby's, far-fetched, selling out for sure. not more than 30%as on other auctions, and Having reported in the Soviet tradition, saying "We are ahead of the entire planet!"

Well you ... Larionov never in my life so do not draw, never. Version absolutely absurd ... things decent in these auctions were not enough, I agree.

I do not think that's what Sotheby's ... undignified as the auction house to do, in fact may convict and then it will be very painful to the same Sotheby's public company ...

Sotheby's
 

Sotheby's managed to sell, in my opinion, absolutely fake Faberge collection, and care about reputation, it, Sotheby's, did not stop!