[QUOTE="fabosch; 1315431] Add this to my father - a publisher, too, man is not poor and not the secondary.
[/QUOTE]

I beg you!

The Bolsheviks quickly disassembled with the rich, "non-poor" and "nevtorostepennymi" Tsar and his family were shot! That they some kind of publisher.

[size="1"]Added after 2 minutes[/size]
[QUOTE="fabosch; 1315511] than Petr Soviet era.
[/QUOTE]

Yes, he does not look like that's the paradox.
Quite weak author, looking at it from today.
Where it up Deineki!

[size="1"]Added after 7 minutes[/size]
Or maybe all the same "Cezanne's" line?
:D

Maybe, of course, and Cezanne, too, but something tells me that young people 1960 "Bunov Diamonds" was interesting Cezanne. Maybe I am judging is the bell tower today. Although, of course, the role of Cezanne fundamental, that is, from a global historical perspective.
But in Russia, as is known, its true.
If we go back to our sheep and take into account the topic of the forum, you will agree, the current prices poslebubnovogo Konchalovsky (which, in theory would have to reflect the artistic merit of works valued) can be explained only by his (Konchalovsky) is known, "the media" and even some fashion . Now that I think is fashionable to collect "Jack of Diamonds" (who can afford it, of course) and it responds to the echo of other works bubnovtsev. Although I am sure that the investment potential of the figures, well, for example, type Ermolaeva, Greenberg, Lapshin much stronger.

Now I saw the mention of Konchalovsky in 1902, "Portrait of Olga Vasilevny Konchalovsky (Surikova), family gathering, at the time of mention.
Incidentally, in 1902, the year of her marriage, although I saw mention and in 1903, but also a year of birth of first child, daughter NP Konchalovskaya.

Added after 54 minutes
Lapshin, the market is there.
Greenberg?
Vladimir Arievich?
According to my observations, little as Ermolaeva.

In valyl Petr!
Lilac, sirenyushka rodimaya, nurse! :D

Interestingly, in light of "bubnovovalettsev" and after a Konchalovsky was a kind of unquestioned authority, or image, we would have just said, a man who knows something. "There were many willing to go to his disciples, but many were disappointed, and then went to such master as Osmyorkin (which is much softer and Cezanne). Osmyorkin A was in the shade Konchalovsky, and now his work is not very "flashes on the screen, although it was rare for education and the poetic nature teacher and artist.

Peter, and Konchalovsky while teaching, in what year?
I know that in VHUTEMAS he taught after the revolution and until 1921, and later already in VHUTEINe from 192 to 1929 anywhere else and did not teach anybody like that.

Well, since 1926 he is professor of painting on a decorative branch offices of the picturesque VKHUTEMAS (before 1927), where he taught from Osmyorkin, until 1929 goda.Sovet of People's Commissars in 1929 appointed personal lifelong pension Konchalovsky and Mashkov at a rate of 225 rubles in mesyats.V in 1947 elected a member of the USSR Academy of Arts. But Osmyorkin not povezlo.Vsyu life, he taught first in VHUTEMAS, Leningrad Academy of Fine Arts in Moscow Surikovke in 1947, was deprived of teaching, accused of formalism and Western influences (!) and died nischite.

Phenomenon is that some dynasties are capable in all political formations remain not only alive (alive and unharmed) but also (in all senses) prosperous. Most likely cause of the so-called "Practical intelligence" (strong expression), which is likely to be transmitted genetically.
(IMHO)

NATA NOVA, and maybe he was just a clever wife?
:)

Peter, one of the properties of the practical intellect is precisely to choose (subconsciously) and use partners (various) "smarter."