CAM - FOOL
Запись от Кирилл Сызранский размещена 29.09.2012 в 01:51
CAM - FOOL
Well, in general, they have a - fool the majority.
I have never lived in a society where the majority are fools, and this, I must say, a brand new, somewhere, even revolutionary experience. I would argue that because it's always been that fools are always nine-tenths of a community, and I also wrote about it, but I've never had in mind the general population. I'm talking about ... the very one-tenth, which is the thinking part of the community: she reads, writes, goes to the movies, ensure the policy and says it. At different times, Russia was producing different goods uneven quality: rifles, tanks, cars, sincere Loyalists informants, dissidents, emigrants (the article of Russian exports are particularly good), and it all moved somewhere, spit, caused great interest. Russia today produces almost exclusively by fools, but in industrial quantities in excess of any demand. Those fools prevail in all spheres of Russian life, including intellectual property. In opposition to them, by the way, also in the majority, so that the constant and repetitive claims to the opposition itself is, I must say, a few got. More on Belarus, it was clear that the situation can not be otherwise: where catastrophic power degenerates there dureet and opposition. If you want another opposition which is not ashamed to identify - let's first change the government, but after that, you do not want. Then it will be obvious and your own idiocy. Did anyone but an idiot can ask questions, what is your positive program, people who clean the road a dead horse? Their positive program is that there was a dead horse, but they are asked why they rush to power. They will not break, their function is hygienic, they are just a little more sensitive to the smell of a dead horse, that's all, but explain that they, too, can not, as fools. Sense of smell does not mean crazy.
Signs fool varied, but focus on the essential. First, the fool is inclined to discuss seriously the obvious, that is, to challenge axioms of the society in which he lives. I would argue (oh, I always argue! There would be waiting to hear the end), which Lobachevsky questioned the axioms of Euclid, fine, I say, - let's abolish the flat world of Euclid and create another, then put into question all of the axioms, but you do not want! You want to live in a post-industrial world and still heated debate on the national question, you want to travel freely abroad - and nostalgia for Stalin, like well-being - and still hate freedom! Fools argue about good or bad Jews, better to all Russian, is it required to believe in God and whether to send all foreigners from the capital - and do not realize that it is not discussed, because the yard is not the Middle Ages and the window is not Saudi Arabia.
Secondly, the fool does not know how to argue. In an argument he is interested only dominance argument it is only go to the person, and the point of view of an opponent for him only determine the inherent, innate characteristics: living abroad (or in the Russian province), is a Jew (Cossack), raising children (cat). What can be a Jew, live in the province and to bring up children or to be foreign Cossack and raise a cat, is not unconscionable fool. He thinks in patterns.
Thirdly, the fool can not look at the process is well-established context: the liberal fool USSR definitely faulty and does not contain anything progressive, for a totalitarian fool everyone who lived in the Soviet Union after Stalin, collapsing a great empire.
Fourth, the fool is very little read. In general, he does not know much, but reading in principle given to him with difficulty, "I have not read it and I will not," "Let them read this paragraph .. raw", "I better read such and such" (called a close friend or neighbor, most frequenter stihov.ru).
Fifth, the fool - almost always conspiracy. He does not believe in the course of things, but strongly believes in a world conspiracy, "twins" blew Bush, Yeltsin - Mason, Putin prevent the Anglo-Saxons. Most of the theories developed to fools and are irrefutable, precisely because it is impossible to prove or disprove the existence of a world conspiracy. The fool does not know what the criterion Popper. His head can not fit the idea of what is true or false can only be rebuttable theory - everything else is not a theory but a dick walrus, which is absolutely unassailable in its clarity and simplicity.
Sixth, a fool never see ourselves. He is not capable of self-irony, but it would let and most fools - monomany and lose their criticality, sitting on a ridge. They can even talk, but just as long as it does not go the Jews, pedophiles or elves.
Why were so many fools - a controversial issue: the easiest way to say that they produce Putin heads interested in ease of management. And it's even logical, as any fool theory. In fact it is a multifactorial process, and these factors - not eternal damnation, fools! - Is the set of people who know, from global warming to the public dissemination of the Internet. The fact is, the thinking part of Russia's first degraded to the point that the discussion in this environment is not possible, predictions about the future are meaningless and endless walking around and repeat the banalities of excess become the norm. None circle gymnasium, no fighting a group of terrorists, no company Signature Vist officials did not seem so hopeless, stupid and aggressive.
The obvious question is why? We often think about the purposes of God, but have not yet found the answer to questioning bernsovskoe Lord in everything, of course, correct, but it seems incomprehensible why he created a solid cabinet with such meager contents. We, in fact, do not know the ultimate purpose of creation, but somehow we like to think that one of his goals is possible progress. However, what it is - imagine that regression is as important as without it we may not feel the proper humility that must precede every Renaissance Dark Ages? Maybe it is not the Renaissance at all, and a fool is such a powerful compensatory mechanism that we did not dream? What if it's an irrational feeling, amazing physical perfection, or the ability to slow down the progress? Leonov is predicted in the "Pyramid" that mankind is doomed to degradation, or it will destroy itself and the world?
It would seem, in the midst of this total nonsense and growing more and more difficult to maintain an optimistic view of things (optimism just is not a fool - the fool is optimistic only to their own account, and the world, he often predicts death, that in case of the death of the world die and fools in their head does not fit). However, there is in all of this, and something truly inspiring: there is a point of view that God does not interested in our business - he is interested in our souls, which we shall return, in Kushner, "dying at its best." Tsvetaeva wrote about it - you, she assured Bessarabova, wasting themselves into small good deeds for evil people who do not appreciate them, and have the soul of their work, a different meaning in nothing! It's selfish, but common view. I do not know details of what our souls - maybe scary to think for ourselves, for the soul of a man brought up with better - but the only thing that makes sense to do, in my opinion, this is a varied development, hardening, grinding and other useful manipulation of his own soul.
So, I say, it is believed that one of the most acute, subtle and powerful tools that soul processing - just life in the time of fools, with no prospects, with a sense of complete historical impasse.
We must recognize that not only the sword tempered in the fire, but also in shit.
Bulls[/B][/URL]
Well, in general, they have a - fool the majority.
I have never lived in a society where the majority are fools, and this, I must say, a brand new, somewhere, even revolutionary experience. I would argue that because it's always been that fools are always nine-tenths of a community, and I also wrote about it, but I've never had in mind the general population. I'm talking about ... the very one-tenth, which is the thinking part of the community: she reads, writes, goes to the movies, ensure the policy and says it. At different times, Russia was producing different goods uneven quality: rifles, tanks, cars, sincere Loyalists informants, dissidents, emigrants (the article of Russian exports are particularly good), and it all moved somewhere, spit, caused great interest. Russia today produces almost exclusively by fools, but in industrial quantities in excess of any demand. Those fools prevail in all spheres of Russian life, including intellectual property. In opposition to them, by the way, also in the majority, so that the constant and repetitive claims to the opposition itself is, I must say, a few got. More on Belarus, it was clear that the situation can not be otherwise: where catastrophic power degenerates there dureet and opposition. If you want another opposition which is not ashamed to identify - let's first change the government, but after that, you do not want. Then it will be obvious and your own idiocy. Did anyone but an idiot can ask questions, what is your positive program, people who clean the road a dead horse? Their positive program is that there was a dead horse, but they are asked why they rush to power. They will not break, their function is hygienic, they are just a little more sensitive to the smell of a dead horse, that's all, but explain that they, too, can not, as fools. Sense of smell does not mean crazy.
Signs fool varied, but focus on the essential. First, the fool is inclined to discuss seriously the obvious, that is, to challenge axioms of the society in which he lives. I would argue (oh, I always argue! There would be waiting to hear the end), which Lobachevsky questioned the axioms of Euclid, fine, I say, - let's abolish the flat world of Euclid and create another, then put into question all of the axioms, but you do not want! You want to live in a post-industrial world and still heated debate on the national question, you want to travel freely abroad - and nostalgia for Stalin, like well-being - and still hate freedom! Fools argue about good or bad Jews, better to all Russian, is it required to believe in God and whether to send all foreigners from the capital - and do not realize that it is not discussed, because the yard is not the Middle Ages and the window is not Saudi Arabia.
Secondly, the fool does not know how to argue. In an argument he is interested only dominance argument it is only go to the person, and the point of view of an opponent for him only determine the inherent, innate characteristics: living abroad (or in the Russian province), is a Jew (Cossack), raising children (cat). What can be a Jew, live in the province and to bring up children or to be foreign Cossack and raise a cat, is not unconscionable fool. He thinks in patterns.
Thirdly, the fool can not look at the process is well-established context: the liberal fool USSR definitely faulty and does not contain anything progressive, for a totalitarian fool everyone who lived in the Soviet Union after Stalin, collapsing a great empire.
Fourth, the fool is very little read. In general, he does not know much, but reading in principle given to him with difficulty, "I have not read it and I will not," "Let them read this paragraph .. raw", "I better read such and such" (called a close friend or neighbor, most frequenter stihov.ru).
Fifth, the fool - almost always conspiracy. He does not believe in the course of things, but strongly believes in a world conspiracy, "twins" blew Bush, Yeltsin - Mason, Putin prevent the Anglo-Saxons. Most of the theories developed to fools and are irrefutable, precisely because it is impossible to prove or disprove the existence of a world conspiracy. The fool does not know what the criterion Popper. His head can not fit the idea of what is true or false can only be rebuttable theory - everything else is not a theory but a dick walrus, which is absolutely unassailable in its clarity and simplicity.
Sixth, a fool never see ourselves. He is not capable of self-irony, but it would let and most fools - monomany and lose their criticality, sitting on a ridge. They can even talk, but just as long as it does not go the Jews, pedophiles or elves.
Why were so many fools - a controversial issue: the easiest way to say that they produce Putin heads interested in ease of management. And it's even logical, as any fool theory. In fact it is a multifactorial process, and these factors - not eternal damnation, fools! - Is the set of people who know, from global warming to the public dissemination of the Internet. The fact is, the thinking part of Russia's first degraded to the point that the discussion in this environment is not possible, predictions about the future are meaningless and endless walking around and repeat the banalities of excess become the norm. None circle gymnasium, no fighting a group of terrorists, no company Signature Vist officials did not seem so hopeless, stupid and aggressive.
The obvious question is why? We often think about the purposes of God, but have not yet found the answer to questioning bernsovskoe Lord in everything, of course, correct, but it seems incomprehensible why he created a solid cabinet with such meager contents. We, in fact, do not know the ultimate purpose of creation, but somehow we like to think that one of his goals is possible progress. However, what it is - imagine that regression is as important as without it we may not feel the proper humility that must precede every Renaissance Dark Ages? Maybe it is not the Renaissance at all, and a fool is such a powerful compensatory mechanism that we did not dream? What if it's an irrational feeling, amazing physical perfection, or the ability to slow down the progress? Leonov is predicted in the "Pyramid" that mankind is doomed to degradation, or it will destroy itself and the world?
It would seem, in the midst of this total nonsense and growing more and more difficult to maintain an optimistic view of things (optimism just is not a fool - the fool is optimistic only to their own account, and the world, he often predicts death, that in case of the death of the world die and fools in their head does not fit). However, there is in all of this, and something truly inspiring: there is a point of view that God does not interested in our business - he is interested in our souls, which we shall return, in Kushner, "dying at its best." Tsvetaeva wrote about it - you, she assured Bessarabova, wasting themselves into small good deeds for evil people who do not appreciate them, and have the soul of their work, a different meaning in nothing! It's selfish, but common view. I do not know details of what our souls - maybe scary to think for ourselves, for the soul of a man brought up with better - but the only thing that makes sense to do, in my opinion, this is a varied development, hardening, grinding and other useful manipulation of his own soul.
So, I say, it is believed that one of the most acute, subtle and powerful tools that soul processing - just life in the time of fools, with no prospects, with a sense of complete historical impasse.
We must recognize that not only the sword tempered in the fire, but also in shit.
Bulls[/B][/URL]
Всего комментариев 0
