February: get
Запись от Кирилл Сызранский размещена 07.02.2012 в 02:07
February: get
I have said many times, and again: the action must be 1) unauthorized, 2) mass, 3) non-violent. Failure to comply with any of these conditions immediately give authorities a decisive advantage. Items 2) and 3) have recently carried out a few words about the number one item and another about something.
Now I often see in a single paragraph or hear one minute of the text are two completely incompatible things, namely: the arguments about the illegitimacy of (at least) Putin and his - literally - of the gang are combined with arguments about "proper tactics" in the election, what- the "negotiations", the probability of the second round, etc. That is, you have a burglar in the house, he slaughtered a couple of family members, rummaging in the chest, standing nonchalantly back to you, you are in the hands of blackjack, and you discuss how you will be arranged with your overall lawn before the house, and what arguments you bring when you negotiate with them to build a garage to you in the yard. How's that? The probability that the cause of idiocy, I ruled out quite simply that there was very sad. My current hypothesis to explain this absurdity - the displacement effect, in the Lorentz sense.
That is when the cat, for example, fear of escalation of the conflict and its escalation into a fight, he was in the presence of the enemy begins to wash (something to do the same.) Nature and society are mutually model, each other, and common, for example, that the victory is always discrete. Draw does not happen, someone has to leave the territory for themselves. It is not necessary, by the way, to really fight it - but PNE should be convincing and persuasive, he only of a cat who is not afraid to come into real conflict. So, all the arguments that "no one wants to Revolution," "need to negotiate," "you can not expose people under the baton" and so on, are just a PNE prissavshego cat ekskyuz May jacket. These sounds unconvincing and talk about the defeat, programmed in advance and the more pity, that victory is possible.
Said the obvious to all participants, for example, marches on Yakimanka: Putin and his "team" - usurpers (the crime, in the literal sense), and thief, his participation in the "election" is not "illegitimate," and on several egregious circumstances is illegal.
He and his gang do not do any "course" - they are bandits, Kushchevskaya activities can take any (up to a liberal), the mask, in general, any discussion with them on a political subject, any action, directly or indirectly by allowing them to behave as "politicians" work to strengthen their power. Can not understand why in this situation, put forward the slogan "For Fair Elections." What kind of (...!) Fair elections? Not only the election is already hopelessly dishonest, and do all the "political situation" is not a political situation. "Opposition" plays right into outright when it calls itself the power of the opposition and behave as such. There is currently no policy. Any "policy" is now only benefit to these bandits, because it works on their legend, strengthens their role.
Require necessary - immediately, without any negotiation, Putin's departure. For those of us who are nervous without the "legalist" argument, so here they are: he carelessly gave us several reasons to remove him from the election right now. Do not talk of observers at elections in which Putin will take part. Do not talk about the transparent ballot boxes, etc. No need to go to court - there is no trial. There is space - have come en masse to it there and then, when we want to do, and not to go with it until they leave. We should be a lot we do not need "the organizers" except technical coordinators, we have to kick the bandits out of the house. And then that will start a policy that finally I will not be interested.
And yet, as they say, to not get up twice. I do not like the situation, "the intelligentsia-and-doom-lords-of-the head of the protest." Personally, I do not go out as a musician, and like a father. Rapture, in which the fall, "the organizers' meetings (with the driving situation is not there, see above), is not accidental causes irritation of a growing number of people. The art should look long and complex ways, it's a professional skill for the artist, perhaps, the instinct here is a disservice. Because when the pipe is flowing, you just have to block closest to the top of the valve and wipe the floor and replace the pipe. We now have a common simple case, such economic, let's be simple and decisive. No, I do not mind funny charming slogans, etc., only to be understood that they do not lead to the result. We do not have time to recover, as they adjust to new rules of the game - they also have Facebook and demonstrations, and will measure, anyone who perekreativit until the oil and the money will continue to flow to wherever they want, and the country will go under.
If you perceive the situation as a game, our position is advantageous - we have the weapons, which they can do nothing to oppose, they do not have this option as a "mass shooting of peaceful demonstrators, demanding withdrawal of the dictator", for the same reason that they do not no "course" - they are generally not interested in our country except as a cash cow, they do not associate it with your future, all they have in the West, and West of mass violence they will not forgive.
It's funny, by the way: they repeat of Orange Technologies "State Department", they say, we are hirelings, and they who are statesmen and patriots, and all the polar opposite - it is their eggs in Western hands. And the scruff of the neck - in our own.
Alexander Manotskov
It.
I have said many times, and again: the action must be 1) unauthorized, 2) mass, 3) non-violent. Failure to comply with any of these conditions immediately give authorities a decisive advantage. Items 2) and 3) have recently carried out a few words about the number one item and another about something.
Now I often see in a single paragraph or hear one minute of the text are two completely incompatible things, namely: the arguments about the illegitimacy of (at least) Putin and his - literally - of the gang are combined with arguments about "proper tactics" in the election, what- the "negotiations", the probability of the second round, etc. That is, you have a burglar in the house, he slaughtered a couple of family members, rummaging in the chest, standing nonchalantly back to you, you are in the hands of blackjack, and you discuss how you will be arranged with your overall lawn before the house, and what arguments you bring when you negotiate with them to build a garage to you in the yard. How's that? The probability that the cause of idiocy, I ruled out quite simply that there was very sad. My current hypothesis to explain this absurdity - the displacement effect, in the Lorentz sense.
That is when the cat, for example, fear of escalation of the conflict and its escalation into a fight, he was in the presence of the enemy begins to wash (something to do the same.) Nature and society are mutually model, each other, and common, for example, that the victory is always discrete. Draw does not happen, someone has to leave the territory for themselves. It is not necessary, by the way, to really fight it - but PNE should be convincing and persuasive, he only of a cat who is not afraid to come into real conflict. So, all the arguments that "no one wants to Revolution," "need to negotiate," "you can not expose people under the baton" and so on, are just a PNE prissavshego cat ekskyuz May jacket. These sounds unconvincing and talk about the defeat, programmed in advance and the more pity, that victory is possible.
Said the obvious to all participants, for example, marches on Yakimanka: Putin and his "team" - usurpers (the crime, in the literal sense), and thief, his participation in the "election" is not "illegitimate," and on several egregious circumstances is illegal.
He and his gang do not do any "course" - they are bandits, Kushchevskaya activities can take any (up to a liberal), the mask, in general, any discussion with them on a political subject, any action, directly or indirectly by allowing them to behave as "politicians" work to strengthen their power. Can not understand why in this situation, put forward the slogan "For Fair Elections." What kind of (...!) Fair elections? Not only the election is already hopelessly dishonest, and do all the "political situation" is not a political situation. "Opposition" plays right into outright when it calls itself the power of the opposition and behave as such. There is currently no policy. Any "policy" is now only benefit to these bandits, because it works on their legend, strengthens their role.
Require necessary - immediately, without any negotiation, Putin's departure. For those of us who are nervous without the "legalist" argument, so here they are: he carelessly gave us several reasons to remove him from the election right now. Do not talk of observers at elections in which Putin will take part. Do not talk about the transparent ballot boxes, etc. No need to go to court - there is no trial. There is space - have come en masse to it there and then, when we want to do, and not to go with it until they leave. We should be a lot we do not need "the organizers" except technical coordinators, we have to kick the bandits out of the house. And then that will start a policy that finally I will not be interested.
And yet, as they say, to not get up twice. I do not like the situation, "the intelligentsia-and-doom-lords-of-the head of the protest." Personally, I do not go out as a musician, and like a father. Rapture, in which the fall, "the organizers' meetings (with the driving situation is not there, see above), is not accidental causes irritation of a growing number of people. The art should look long and complex ways, it's a professional skill for the artist, perhaps, the instinct here is a disservice. Because when the pipe is flowing, you just have to block closest to the top of the valve and wipe the floor and replace the pipe. We now have a common simple case, such economic, let's be simple and decisive. No, I do not mind funny charming slogans, etc., only to be understood that they do not lead to the result. We do not have time to recover, as they adjust to new rules of the game - they also have Facebook and demonstrations, and will measure, anyone who perekreativit until the oil and the money will continue to flow to wherever they want, and the country will go under.
If you perceive the situation as a game, our position is advantageous - we have the weapons, which they can do nothing to oppose, they do not have this option as a "mass shooting of peaceful demonstrators, demanding withdrawal of the dictator", for the same reason that they do not no "course" - they are generally not interested in our country except as a cash cow, they do not associate it with your future, all they have in the West, and West of mass violence they will not forgive.
It's funny, by the way: they repeat of Orange Technologies "State Department", they say, we are hirelings, and they who are statesmen and patriots, and all the polar opposite - it is their eggs in Western hands. And the scruff of the neck - in our own.
Alexander Manotskov
It.
Всего комментариев 0
