Вернуться   Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство > Дневники > Марат Гельман

Оценить эту запись

very nice analysis of the Left at the Morozov

Запись от Марат Гельман размещена 22.07.2012 в 11:17

Came a son, asks: "And who are left?»



Now, I said, I'll show you a picture that you knew how to look left and what we have in Russia is a species.

1. Dull Marxist professor Kagarlitsky . He writes big thick books, which are explained in detail why Marxism - the right one. During the Revolution he did not believe, but believes that Marxism gives a correct "understanding of the world." It is a classic Marxist style - writing long and combine the flows are very detailed reasoning and journalistic images (as Marx himself wrote). But he's very cultured, and it can show the face of Russia at any international conference.

2. Honest intellectual Trotskyite. In my generation it Alexander Tarasov . A good, kind man. He was keenly interested in any anti-systemic disorders that may somehow destabilize the world system in general ("Red Brigade", "anti-globalization vandal actions," the rebel army of Colombian drug cartels, etc.).

3 . Intelligent Trotskyite-razlozhenets. Since Trotskyism - a Nechaev, "demons" and intriguing (they call it "entrism" , then among the Trotskyites many confused aesthetes. Here, the most striking character types we have - it is < strong> Daria Mitina and Viatcheslav Danilov . from them should stay away.

4. populist writer. You've got to understand that there are "martyrs for the people's grief" - deep right in spirit, because they think it is within one of the people. And now the left-populist writer sympathizes with the world. This is our Shargunov Sergei .

5. present Left artists. «Pussy Rayot» . They sit in jail. They are good, and left because they are thoroughly angered both the system and the church, and a fascist "middle class".

6. Gorbachev, Grigory Yavlinsky, Igrunov . These are special old leftists who believe that there was a way to reform the Soviet Union in the direction of humanism. Or, at least, they made efforts to to do it. In contrast to conventional social reformers, they believed that the Soviet Union could build their own new "welfare state».

7. Traditional social reformers. Sergei Mironov, for example. Good people too. They do not have much imagination, they just want the same institutions as in the "social state" in Northern Europe.

8. Boris Kupriyanov, Alexander Bikbov, Kirill Medvedev and others. This is a very good people. This neoanarhisty. They - supporters of the "autonomous action" and create all sorts of social spaces outside the state. In general, outside the "handling" in the understanding of French philosopher Michel Foucault. Most of them can be trusted - they are honest people. In my youth these were geologists.

9. Communists in the State Duma. Keep in mind that they never left. But But among municipal deputies from the Communist Party in the province, many of these fighters for the "people's happiness." There is a sincere defenders of the arbitrariness of the system. Therefore, all the Communists can not be measured by one yardstick.

10. There are all sorts of "left-wing sects" - "anti-fascists," Limonov's National Bolsheviks, yet we had all sorts of "revolutionary army", one of them blew up the monument to Nicholas II a decade ago. From these need to stay away. (If the conversation will go, you have to say this: « Lemons , of course, a brilliant writer and I respect him, but ...", etc.) In short, distance. mainly because they, like the ultra-right, infiltrated security forces and there has never can not be exactly sure - talk to the underground or the Cheka, "under the guise of».

In general, need to be friends with the Kupriyanov and "Pussy Rayot." That is the "autonomists" and avant-garde artists . with some left-right, unfortunately, can not be friends, they are arrogant, as an artist Osmolovsky . But we can be friends with but left artist Dmitry Vrubel (who, incidentally, is now joined German Pirate International). With Catherine Tar is also good friends. It is a simple but clever, and she has a very good book on Russian art of the twentieth century. By the way, it is written so it is clear that any of its senior student can read. And even should.




taken from here http://www.colta.ru/docs/1471

Link to original
Размещено в Без категории
Просмотров 1162 Комментарии 0
Всего комментариев 0

Комментарии

 




Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 19:51.
Telegram - Обратная связь - Обработка персональных данных - Архив - Вверх


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Перевод: zCarot