Do you trust our experts?

[d_atiquariato]

In light of recent events with experts from the Tretyakov whether it makes sense to trust all of Russia's experts? Although, having experience of obtaining expertise in a variety of museum and institute laboratories in Moscow and St. Petersburg, I can say that no time had any one expert did not pay money for a positive result! All works, brought me to the expertise or the attribution of receiving an objective assessment. So, rumors of corruption among workers centers examinations strongly peuvelicheny.
Nevertheless, having expertise in Russia, three to one job very well-known artist (all positive), having listened to several oral opinions and realizing that for a good sale is still not enough, he decided to turn to foreign art.
Received a certificate of authenticity on this thing already from New - York.
Do you think, what are the chances of withdrawal of foreign laboratories in Russia's market? Will demand for their services here? At least I can say that the equipment in the field spekralnyh analysis such as theirs, in Russia, no one ... But such an analysis in the technical and technological ekstpertize to date the most reliable.

[qwerty]

According to experts: Experts are people. People are honest and vice versa, and experts differ. There are experts Tretyakov Gallery, whose names have already become a household word, and work with the examinations of those experts is difficult to sell, even if these works are genuine. There are experts who have never been seen in the engagement, and they all trust. And among the latter is not only formal workers museums or centers of expertise, but also gallery owners, collectors, art historians. I think the correct approach was that the Confederation of Antiquaries and artdilerov, where by a vote of its member galleries, was a list of experts, which all rely. At least, I am looking at this list, did not find it questionable.

With regard to foreign laboratories, I have repeatedly offered absolutely false things with the endorsement of the Western laboratories. And today I do not know a single laboratory, as in Russia and abroad, which we could trust 100%. If you know this - share adresochkom and experience, I will be grateful.

[Meister]

receivers for the examination in New York or in any other western country ... I think it may be isolated instances where the examination abroad will be better and more appreciated, than in Russia. Say, for Chagall and Jawlensky is recognized only examination made by the Committee and the Fund respectively. But it is difficult to imagine a situation where the works of Russian artists will be attributed abroad.

[artemirra]

qwerty,
Tell me, where I published a list of experts whom they trust Confederation?
site it is not, and would like to see ...

[qwerty]

artemirra,

See attached file. The website of the Confederation, this list will appear in two weeks.

[artemirra]

Confused by one thing: the lack of experts on Russian art 18-19 centuries. One Ignatova, but as far as I know, Natalia takes only a few artists and only the second half of the 19 century.

[Konstantin]

The site appeared a list of certified experts from the "Confederation of Antiquaries and artdilerov", as well as list of members of the confederation.

[LCR]

From the experts on the list, I only know Valeria Silaeva. This is a great restorer and absolutely honest man, perfectly znayushy Russian Art 2 nd half of the twentieth century. By examination it fits very seriously, seeking additional information to the successors of artists, bases his opinion, in general, the confidence he deserves the full and bessomnennogo.

[Konstantin]

I know Julia V. Rybakov and Elena Mikhailovna Zhukov.
Decent and competent specialists. They also, incidentally, take part in the arrangement of icons, the investment risk on this site. Here is written about this:

http://artinvestment.ru/about/council/

[Евгений]

Сообщение от d_atiquariato

How do you think, what are the chances of withdrawal of foreign laboratories in Russia's market? Will demand for their services here? At least I can say that the equipment in the field spekralnyh analysis such as theirs, in Russia, no one ... But such an analysis in the technical and technological ekstpertize to date the most reliable.

Laboratory studies are important in the attribution of paintings 15-17 century, with attribution Painting 19-early 20 th century, important examination of art criticism, the analysis of comparative base (which is mostly in museums).
Any laboratory demand on the art market, (they are almost there). The whole problem, whether ovchinka dressing ..