Refusal of a living artist from his work

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от MikhailK

there is Always @- beneficiary (beneficiary).

Usually @- Yes. But here the situation is twisted so that everything is in the red, use to anyone anymore. Whether he stole a hat, whether he stole a hat.

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от MikhailK

Collectors in the red, the artists in the red, but the gallery @- ???

And they that good? To answer counter-charges, to dissuade, to dispel suspicion, to spend nerves @- little joy

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от Кирилл Syzran

In this gallery, where the owner in the eye is lying and does not blush?

What he does not blush? He holds a notarized paper (that's right) from the artist formally outweigh the hundreds of thousands of other evidence. Plus there is your art a reasoned opinion, expressed publicly. With so many bases it was hard not to publicize. I spoke with Popov in the beginning of this story. He believes that Gorokhovsky began to forge, and should sound the alarm. That thing is from the collection of Gurov, who lived near the Studio Gorokhovsky, he didn't know. And I do too.

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от манна

I gave Jure for examination reference work Gorokhovsky, purchased from Popov.
Yura know for a long time and sure he has a proper job. 100% sure.

That is, this work is already underway. When can we expect the results of the examination?