|
Artists, artworks, art history Discuss artists, their lives and works, the history of works’ creation and other art history issues. |
|
Опции темы | Опции просмотра |
28.09.2009, 18:53 | Язык оригинала: Русский #12 |
Старожил
Регистрация: 13.03.2009
Сообщений: 542
Спасибо: 70
Поблагодарили 626 раз(а) в 157 сообщениях
Репутация: 1025
|
Bravo, Tjutchev,! You have worked nicely. Just right to issue concerned (owners of the site?) Account. But we're not here for personal gain, and the Holy art for. Not so, maestro?
But agree with you only one item. This - not Bogolyubov. However, if you are ready to transform his impression of a certain proposition that this landscape - carved out another piece of the picture, then and there we have with you is a consensus. But in this case, your entire argument about the composition is no longer itself. For your considerations in favor of this version is that there was also no logical necessity from the left side in the background to depict what a small part of Toli Toli ship port facility. In addition, I shall pay attention that the dimensions of this work does not conform to the standard format of the French, that when writing this etude, it would be quite natural and comfortable. I do not see in this marina is no color disharmony. It worked competently, confidently and soundly, not art, of course, but very professional. Stylistically very similar to the hierarchy of the French period. Precisely to say so - that his paintings of that period stylistically trudnootlichimy of equal talent with French colleagues. There is still time, but if need be to lay out the test anonymous pictures of several artists. Let the experts and specialists will determine which of them Bogolyubov. Without belittling the great achievements AP Bogolyubov to Russian culture, yet it must be admitted that all the superlatives in the determination of his creative contribution, given in your text, just loosely with one important reservation - only for Russian art. In the context of European art of the 19 th century he was an artist medium capacity. Art world can do without his work, without losing its integrity. Here, for example, without his disciples Polenova and Pohitonova can not. He has not, so to speak, his coloristic person. Especially in the so-called Vel'skii period, while at the named students or have Kharlamov, who also worked at the Wehle, that person was, the color in their paintings immediately recognizable. No accident that the curators of a major exhibition of Russian Art 19 th century in the Paris Museum d'Orsay are not included in this exhibit no product hierarchy. The museum represents the French art of the second half of the 19 th century, with its outstanding landscape painters, paintings and hierarchy would look at all homely. With regard to the signature on the marina under consideration, then, in my opinion, it is made of solid professional hand, well reproducing the incertitude and the uncertainty of the hand hierarchy. Among the numerous signatures of the artist in the databases of specialists and there is. When this picture was seen on the forum for the first time, I expressed doubt that the AP Bogolyubov, who has lived in France for many years, could be so grossly wrong to show the place - HAVRE. If local residents to ask how to get to Havre, you simply do not understand. In French, the name of this city inseparable from the article Le. Correctly only LE HAVRE. Someone replied that he had seen similar inscriptions on his paintings in museums. If so, then the general hierarchy in France had problems not only with artistic self-identity, but also with the French. What remains for us, my friend Tjutchev? As a not-hudozhnecheski inflicted by the signature and name of the place, but the assumption that if a piece of another picture of hierarchy, it is unlikely that this would be a marina, he was putting on a special frame and sign it. (According to the French mind stretcher and canvas and nails more than 100 years, ie, as they say, all native. I think, an expert on this fact had its effect). Admittedly, not many. However, there is intuition. In such a delicate case like ours, gentlemen, we must not ignore our intuition. Yes, a colleague, is obliged to warn. Negative atributiruya online this picture, we are with you take out of public distrust of the well-known specialist Bogolyubov - VA Petrov. Say leniently - put him in appearance. Well, you, master, look man, not timid, not pasuyuschim to authorities. You yourself own authority! In this regard, I have an idea to speak with the appeal to Vladimir Aleksandrovich, now that the dispute about the authorship of the three marina we are with you in the majority. Still wait for your consent. Suddenly you change your mind. |
Эти 4 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо ранжер за это полезное сообщение: |
28.09.2009, 19:23 | Язык оригинала: Русский #13 |
Гуру
Регистрация: 04.06.2008
Адрес: Сочи
Сообщений: 14,663
Спасибо: 18,865
Поблагодарили 16,455 раз(а) в 4,506 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 273
Репутация: 32442
|
RUSSIAN PAINTING XVIII - early XX century. Full academic catalog Saratov Chersonesus Museum im. Radishshev
The catalog, training which lasted for many years, includes all 1,051 works of Russian artists, stored in the museum collection. Format: 22х28 cm, 560 pages, illustrated., Hardcover, M., 2004 -------------------------------------------------- ---------- Very useful book for art dealers, collectors. In the catalog of more than 200 works of Bogolyubov AP -------------------------------------------------- ----------- In the catalog of studies introduced are weaker studies ... |
29.09.2009, 03:17 | Язык оригинала: Русский #14 | ||||||||
Гуру
Регистрация: 19.09.2008
Сообщений: 5,529
Спасибо: 4,883
Поблагодарили 11,835 раз(а) в 2,947 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 8
Репутация: 22524
|
Цитата:
Цитата:
Цитата:
Читать дальше...
Цитата:
Читать дальше...
Цитата:
Цитата:
Цитата:
Цитата:
Sincerely, Tiutchev. |
||||||||
29.09.2009, 14:02 | Язык оригинала: Русский #15 | |
Гуру
Регистрация: 26.07.2008
Адрес: РФ, Самара
Сообщений: 74,944
Спасибо: 27,789
Поблагодарили 55,134 раз(а) в 24,142 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 133
Репутация: 102194
|
Цитата:
Someone give a link? |
|
29.09.2009, 16:55 | Язык оригинала: Русский #16 |
Гуру
Регистрация: 19.09.2008
Сообщений: 5,529
Спасибо: 4,883
Поблагодарили 11,835 раз(а) в 2,947 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 8
Репутация: 22524
|
In the market of this work, AP Bogoliubov, indeed, appear very rarely. This has always been: in Soviet times, and in 90 years. Now nothing has changed, his work still rarely offered by dealers and are rarely at auction. As before, many fakes passed off as the work hierarchy. Those undisputed work, which still appeared on the market, leaving behind a very good money.
For example, three fake pictures of those that were sold at auction, and genuine, the most expensive work of the artist from ever marketed at auctions (currently): 1. 24.5x35 cm, 1883, oil on panel, EUR 7,200 (Auktionshaus Stahl) 2. 30h43, 5 oil on board 2.121 $ (Miillon & Associes 29.05.2009) 3. 38h18, 5 oil on canvas not sold (ArtCurial 23.03.2009) 4. Moscow 1878. 73h92, 3 3.305.033 $ (Shristies 28/11/2007) |
29.09.2009, 17:06 | Язык оригинала: Русский #17 |
Гуру
Регистрация: 19.09.2008
Сообщений: 5,529
Спасибо: 4,883
Поблагодарили 11,835 раз(а) в 2,947 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 8
Репутация: 22524
|
Thank you, Eugene, for being reminded of this useful book. She, too, I have. I would be very interested to know what studies you believe weaker than the one who introduced the ranzher. Just name the numbers of these images in the catalog. |
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо Тютчев за это полезное сообщение: | Santa (01.07.2011) |
29.09.2009, 17:25 | Язык оригинала: Русский #18 |
Гуру
Регистрация: 04.06.2008
Адрес: Сочи
Сообщений: 14,663
Спасибо: 18,865
Поблагодарили 16,455 раз(а) в 4,506 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 273
Репутация: 32442
|
№ 45,53,56,62,64,69,90,112,124,133,154,184,204.
|
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо Евгений за это полезное сообщение: | Тютчев (29.09.2009) |
29.09.2009, 20:55 | Язык оригинала: Русский #19 |
Старожил
Регистрация: 13.03.2009
Сообщений: 542
Спасибо: 70
Поблагодарили 626 раз(а) в 157 сообщениях
Репутация: 1025
|
Ah, the maestro, still folded!
And I was hoping that we, together, together we turn to the kind Vladimir Aleksandrovich proposal to leave the banal lesson - drawing reference to the dubious pictures, not to introduce more of a temptation, and not only Russian speculators. Not this writer's work. It is better to return to the belles-lettres, to continue to make up his not bezynteresnye book. Well, no, no way. Maybe next time with someone else.
Читать дальше...
|
Эти 3 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо ранжер за это полезное сообщение: |
29.09.2009, 22:03 | Язык оригинала: Русский #20 |
Гуру
Регистрация: 26.07.2008
Адрес: РФ, Самара
Сообщений: 74,944
Спасибо: 27,789
Поблагодарили 55,134 раз(а) в 24,142 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 133
Репутация: 102194
|
ranzher, thanks for a beautiful essay.
Sam would like to unsubscribe to the topic hierarchy. But tomorrow. |
Метки |
Bogolyubov, Russian Art Gallery, Russian art, Russian artists |
|
|
Похожие темы | ||||
Тема | Автор | Разделы | Ответов | Последние сообщения |
Alushta artist Maryahin Alexander Petrovich | Артём | Ukrainian artists | 8 | 19.11.2010 21:55 |
Kuchmenko Viktor | adelfos_kibotos | Costs, valuation, attribution | 2 | 06.07.2009 10:42 |
Andrey Alekhin | dedulya37 | Exhibitions and events | 12 | 17.06.2009 22:27 |
Hau Edward Petrovich | uriart | Appraisal | 13 | 01.12.2008 23:19 |
AP Bogolyubov (1824-1896). Ship | John Preston | Costs, valuation, attribution | 17 | 24.09.2008 02:46 |