This is not Stozharau!

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от "Guriev, Igor

A Comrade.
Guriev - coordinator of this insidious plot.

Just Comrade.
Guriev spice up your presentation topic, and interested in selling this sketch Comrade.
tried to prove that "black" is "white."
>

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Just Comrade.
Guriev no time to spice up your presentation topic

Why not time?
I saw in the catalog and remembered.


=============

As for me, I never tell anyone proves nothing.

I'm just sharing my observations, recollections and reflections.

[Артём]

Сообщение от Glasha; 1667421"

But still, looking at these horses, still can not agree (I will not voice - why).

Let's face it. Before that either depict a living, an artist with the formation course to learn or at least look anatomy. Definitely!
That sketch and fragments.
The first piece - it's not a horse, a mountain Saiga (lumbar jumped to the ridiculous. The second piece (I think the horse deducted from the picture Stozharova "Arriving at the gathering of farmers, best workers"). Only in the picture, it stays straight and back in her flat, and to sketch it falls. In the second snippet I opened it a bit so as not to fall forward, it now stands, but the front legs are longer than the rear. All papers Stozharova anatomy is all right, he was a professional. And as the lumbar and scapular at the same level.
On the painting a long conversation. But as you can see on the submitted sketch forefront scratched the back of the hand (type of grass) when Stozharova forefront pasty or vice versa always done just as easily podmalevka medium or large size brush.
No, not Stozharau.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

[QUOTE="Guriev, Igor; 1667523] Why not time?
[/QUOTE]

"No time" for those interested in selling.

[size="1"]Добавлено через 8 минут[/size]

Сообщение от "Guriev, Igor

As for me, I never tell anyone does not prove anything.

You - no, the other party tried to ...
>

[Allena]

Сообщение от "Maroussia

So if someone talks with him, let him know

Maroussia, it is registered on the forum dedulya37_son, but it seems that there does not exist.
I once wrote to him, he said.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

As for me, I never tell anyone does not prove anything.

You - no, the other party tried to ...
>

Сообщение от Tiutchev

But it is his job.
There is no doubt about it.

 
> > > > >

[Пелагея Ларина]

It has long been following the development of this theme .... I'll make my "five cents".
Submission of papers under the auspices of "won the lottery" with a sticker of the Salon on export - raised eyebrows and suspicion immediately.
By logical reasoning, participants concluded that to the lottery, this work has no relation - and rightly so. Although it is strange that an art about the lottery no one really knows how it turned out. But this is not the point.
I did not leave the question - Why do the owners had to be "tied" to the job lottery??
Passage through the Salon paintings of export increases the status of work and, accordingly, its value and price!
Let me explain. Director of the Moscow Salon of exports (Smolenka was on, opposite the Foreign Ministry), as a rule, she went to workshops and take jobs. Circle of Artists, "admitted" to the cabin, was quite limited - we know the name - the main criterion, well, were, of course, and so-called "own" ... not without it. Salon paintings sold to foreigners for hard currency, trade fairs held abroad.
The artists are paid 50%of the "checks", which you could buy scarce goods in the shops of "Birch" and 50%in ruble terms of the estimated value of work, in the event of its sale.
In general, the prestige and earnings.
Option could be only two.
First - the work sold - lucky artist got the money.
The second - the artist took his, not sold, work.
But, as usual, where two and three there. The third - not a few works by famous artists have sunk into the depths of the Salon on exports, for whatever reason, did not return, for example, foreign exhibitions (not sold) .. In short neither the money nor the pictures. And the fate of these works - is unknown, yet .. may "float" will be ...
Shed light on this particular 'story', I hope, will Stozharov relatives. By anyone who is in contact, it would be appropriate to inform the heirs ...

And more. Confuses me, the absence of a byline. In the case of a lottery is a "ride" could!, But Salon export, exhibitions abroad ... - is doubtful. Yes, and study - this is weird! Of course the "miracles" in the Soviet Union had enough, but still ... confused!

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Pelagia Larin, to thin . lottery these things are unrelated , of course .
And the work that VF Stozharau gave the lottery , are known , they are not a lot .
And these " Yerevan " sketches than paper labels on the back with author's name is nothing more to Stozharovu not tied . A piece of paper ? "What papers ? - In the modern development of printing in the West, print Soviet passport - it's such a trifle thing about this is ridiculous to talk about ... ( c) >

[Пелагея Ларина]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

But these " Yerevan " sketches than paper labels on the back with author's name is nothing more to Stozharovu not tied . A piece of paper ? Yes, that paper

Well , of course ! - that 's the thing - that the only piece of paper ... the form , not the strict reporting , notice , filled in by hand ... .. someone ... >
Although a piece of paper , then , seems to be true - I have a couple of works with the same ( even on one 's handwriting looks like ! ) - my husband had time to " pull " from the Salon on exports after the death of her mother in law . Although attempts to " mix up " the issue still had a place to be ...
 I can show - for comparison .

[Евгений]

Сообщение от Larina, Pelagia

I can show - for comparison.

Show me .. at least with birochkami We will understand ..