Art totalitarian

[Tana]

LCR when I read your post where you mentioned "vulgar Soviet-bubnovovaletovskuyu lilac", I decided that you do not like all the artists who were members of "Diamonds Quest"

[LCR]

Сообщение от Tana

LCR when I read your post where you mentioned "vulgar Soviet-bubnovovaletovskuyu lilac", I decided that you do not like all the artists who were members of the "Jack of Diamonds"

Artists' Jack of Diamonds "I really do not particularly like (with a few - very few - exceptions), but I have not written about them, but on a more or less faceless socialist realists, who flooded the Soviet exhibition written" like real "flowers.

[Maikl]

Distinguished experts !!!!.... conjunctures of choice form the people choose the maximum benefit from their actions ..... and future generations ... will buy something that they will present kraaaaaaasivenko .... everything is progressing in a spiral

[Tana]

LCR know, but sometimes I like something that's not enough of these, written "as real" flowers, I want more joy, air, light and color ... (but that's who and what pleases)

[color="# 666686"]Added after 2 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Maikl

Dear experts !!!!.... conjunctures of choice form the people choose the maximum benefit from their actions ..... and future generations ... will buy something that they will present kraaaaaaasivenko all .... develops in a spiral

just need to have their brains ....

[SergeiSK]

I want to go to the examples Here are five pictures from my collection. All the authors of the popular, well-deserved, etc. Except for one. But all of these paintings, as well as artists, can be united under the red flag of social realism Well, where is the lumpen art? Ryazhskiy with his fireman? This painting is allegorical for 1927 - a pioneer in the Roman toga.
1. GG Ryazhskiy "Portrait of a young fireman, 1927
2. BN Yakovlev "Girl on stone" in 1935
3. D. Nalbandian "On the road to Jaipur, 1961
4. M. Sokolov "Russian field" in 1940
5. AM Gerasimov, "Sketch for a portrait of Olga Lepeshinskaya" 1939
Tomorrow will remove pictures

[SergeiSK]

Сообщение от Maikl

will buy something that they will present kraaaaaaasivenko .... everything is progressing in a spiral

People will buy what they like. This was and always will ...

[artcol]

Сообщение от SergeiSK

lumpen

I used - underclass. By that I mean the lack of culture of people of previous generations. It was expected because all the formatting and display a new type of man. Soviet.
"I quit drinking, smoking, trying to quit
Do not drink coffee and not eat almost
I train yourselves for the benefit
Soviet and unpretentious type

Who will live here than - no banner
All malicious dement
Whom Spartacus that that Dynamo
Whom that will is that the prison "
D. Prigov

[nikola]

Сообщение от Tana

So do not often heard phrase in British galleries that it was the Soviet artists is very high level of painting

Yes, there were many masters. Learn painting was who. Those who graduated
in the '40s and '60s, all beautifully painted, boldly and competently written.
Must add, it is surprising educated, intelligent people.
What they are deep, not superficial. Apparently in the works of all
present.

[SergeiSK]

I have absolutely no poeticises the Soviet era, even I myself counted among the victims of it (Deineka sat, everyone sat ...), but the Soviet school of painting with a strong focus - Socialist Realism, was as powerful as our launch Totalitarianism is bad for the individual, but is useful for statehood. So we will respect our past, whatever it may be, and try to save it. And willing to do it ... there is plenty

[Самвел]

Here's another. Tomorrow, something that'll take.