Collectors

[uriart]

Create a beautiful collection of very difficult and it is not given to everyone!
And you, Eugene?

[Евгений]

Сообщение от uriart

his collection,

I art dealer, in the profile is a little paintings (small part), try to buy: folk, distinguished artists, period (1920-1950gg)

[Admin]

Top-10 collectors of works of art

In the July issue of the influential American magazine ArtNews will be published a list of 200 most important collectors of works of art. The rankings are based on surveys conducted among the correspondents are collectors, art dealers, auction houses representatives, museum directors, curators and consultants in 22 countries.

[uriart]

Gentlemen
You at least one person in the list of collectors found a poor?
Not to mention the word poor.
So who can afford to collect works of art!
Art does not belong to the people, as when you wrote back Ulyanov-Lenin.
Art belongs to the elite and not the masses. The masses Give pop. And they (the masses) of happiness UPI ---- Xia
And Finance - the main factor creating collections!
And you try to create a collection without money?
Do you think will happen?

[LCR]

Сообщение от uriart

God!
You at least one person in the list of collectors found a poor?
Not to mention the word poor.
So who can afford to collect works of art!
Art does not belong to the people, as when you wrote back Ulyanov-Lenin.
Art belongs to the elite and not the masses. The masses Give pop. And they (the masses) of happiness UPI ---- Xia
And Finance - the main factor creating collections!
And you try to create a collection without money?
Thought they would receive?

You know, collectors of unofficial art in the 60-70-ies. - Grobman, Talochkin, Rusanov, Nutovich, Carpenter-Zabusov - were far from rich people, they just can say, devoted his life to collecting, became friends with artists, and they gave them their jobs or inferior to a very low price. One example: learning that one artist is leaving the USSR, Talochkin, who at that time the ruble was not a tinker, took the money in debt, came and bought about 20 paintings, which are now in the Museum of Other Art.

You can also call Mikhail Ershov, which it did not have huge funds in the 90-ies. collected a very large and rich kollekktsiyu.
Of course, the situation has changed, but I think that the secret of success - trust your taste and buy as soon as possible. Thus, the risk to which the collector is inversely proportional to the means necessary to compile a good collection.
I think also that the purchase of young artists who have not yet received wide publicity, more worthy, than to buy pictures of artists who have hyped others))

I would add: from the present collector Igor Markin differs from the current "collector with unlimited funds" that he bought many artists, when they were still unclaimed.

[qwerty]

Сообщение от LCR

Of course, the situation has changed, but I think that the secret of success - trust your taste and buy as soon as possible. Thus, the risk to which the collector is inversely proportional to the means necessary to compile a good collection.
I think also that the purchase of young artists who have not yet received wide publicity, more worthy, than to buy pictures of artists who have hyped others))

I'll make its own contribution to the debate.
First, it seems to me that there is always a number of artists, which has "not noticed". For example, the now fashionable in the Sixties can be called Slepysheva, Zhutovski, guest book, Belyutin school and a dozen more names that are today facing very little money, but they certainly go up in price, while being a really good masters. This collector should not only be for sale at auction, but is exploring time trends, mutual interest in his artistic medium or direction. Thus, and can not find those "last", which would eventually become the "first".
Secondly, everyone here for some reason only talk about an expensive painting, but there still exists and graphics, immeasurably cheaper, but no worse than oil. What brilliant collection of charts collected, say, the late Collectors Semen Yakovlevich Feldstein or Alexander Zavolokin! They collected a penny, incidentally. And today the graphics are quite reasonable, because many moneybags despised, they need that richer.
Thirdly, it is important to understand that the collection - it is not "a lot" and "conceptually." Today, it's not hard, and many can afford to collect, say, two dozen pictures of the Leningrad school of the thirties-forties, and it would be a collection, which over time will cost money, and, more importantly, cause an increasing concern.

But all this is possible only in one case - if you really carried away at the direction, which decided to collect, if you really will like. Collect this collection, guided only by motives of interest, in my opinion, impossible.

[fross]

Dear LCR and qwerty, I very much waited for your answers, and they did not disappoint.
I like that "buy young artists who have not yet received wide publicity, more dignified than to buy pictures of artists who have hyped the other and if you really carried away at the direction, which decided to collect, if you really will like. collect this collection, guided only by motives of interest, in my opinion, impossible. "
The best concept for beginning collectors unencumbered large capital and not think.
Knowing how you are surprisingly generous share information and, wittingly or unwittingly, help that enlightenment, I would like to learn from you more often with new names.

[Евгений]

Сообщение от fross

buy young artists

  This is a very risky investments, the young artists in Russia scores tysyach.Esli just for decoration apartment (the interior), then another matter.
If you collect high-quality, classic painting is a lot of good artists who worked in 1930-1950, (a small price ye 500-1500), is a beautiful work of nonconformists 1960-1970's (the schedule of these artists at the moment is underestimated). The most important thing for you soul itself?

[color="# 666686"]Added after 2 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от qwerty

This is not only a collector of watches for sale at auction, but is exploring time trends, mutual interest in his artistic medium or direction.

All right, this is the basis of any good collection.

[Meister]

Сообщение от Eugene

is a beautiful work of nonconformists 1960-1970's (the schedule of these artists at the moment is underestimated)

this is difficult to find and buy - it is not always worth the small money ...

Purchase of young artists - the case interesting))) depends on your own taste, intuition and understanding of current trends in the market) of course, a man of will not be able to make the right choice ... but to gather a collection based only on their taste preferences is quite ...

[fross]

These are the words of the critic Ego from the cartoon "Ratatouille":

"... Not everyone is a great artist, but a great artist can come from nowhere."

Читать дальше... 

If the degree of untwisted (which is almost equivalent value) to take for greatness, then perhaps you can with disdain and condescension to speak to the thousands of unknown artists.
How much work and how many authors can see the man in the street, specialists and experts? And where? In what period? And how to compare? After limiting the sample imposes serious error in the findings. Under the current system is what is known - is great, because of the loss over time, all the other works. They were simply thrown away as trash those with no values.