Glamor in the art

[Veronic]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

He's so Vielha e Mijaran in the subconscious, chtoim nevdoek even that may not be simply "other", and values at all ..

Nath, at all times, people were satisfied and dissatisfied with life.
I will not argue, Russia spiritual country and people here are trying to give preference to other values. Glamor is a material aspect of modern life, and can live ignoring it, or opposing something.

I opened this topic, because we live in a glamorous time, the time of advertising and design, and artists have the right to display all this in his paintings. I do not see nothing wrong. Why art should always roll out a priori lumps? Is there an unofficial ban on the ease of painting?

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Veronic

Glamor is a material aspect of modern life,

Veronica, whose life? You have a lot of glamor in life? I glamor of Tolna manicure and a state of mind ..
(In other words: (This) glamor in itself hard to find, but nowhere else find it impossible ...
Or:
Glamor is not the one who has everything, but which lacks what is ..
  A "material" Glamor, too, is a derivative of the Society of consumption ... excess (or "pervoneobhodimost")-though as someone)
And if you go back to Maslow, then on what step to put "glamor"?
And in general, glamor is a myth (a dream, an illusion), or is it something tangible?

[Veronic]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

I have a glamor Tolna manicure and a state of mind ..

I think that's enough

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Veronic

I opened this topic, because we live in a glamorous time

"WE" is who? I do not live. (And probably even could not, if it were possible, although ktob specifically to explain: "Who is this glamor and what it eats)
Well what glamor. if you have a family. children, the duties ...
Glamor and responsibilities-are incompatible.
I came to the memory of a glamorous diva de Lempicka (which concealed from all his daughter-even close friends did not know about its existence)
nd Th then suffered ...(" logorreya "-learned a new word yesterday-all. disable)

[Veronic]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

"WE" is who? I do not live.

Nath, come on. If there is no glamor in your life, you show that you live without the glamor, images can: shy:

[NATA NOVA]

Here?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Veronic

we live in a glamorous time

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

"WE" is who? I do not live. (

And I do not live in glamorous time. "

[color="# 666686"]Added after 1 minute[/color]

Сообщение от Veronic

we live in a glamorous time, the time of advertising and design

And you equate the "glamor" and "advertising and design?

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Do you equate the "glamor" and "advertising and design?

This "birds of a feather" advertising glamor glamor and advertising

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Tamila

Carlo Dzhanferro, Italy, 1 bed /portraits /series
The houses of wealthy Gypsies in Romania and Moldova are the demonstration of the prestige, power and wealth of the family.

A good illustration of this theme.
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showpo...mp;postcount=9

[gans]

Сообщение от Veronic

Glamor in art

Glamor-this concept is not of art, it has entered into wide use not so long ago, along with the age of advertising and PR.
For me, glamor primarily associated with the concept of fashion and fashionableness. Of course some artists are trying to exploit this phenomenon, but as we see absolutely no matter in what direction the arts they work, because that would be the art was included in the "glamorous tusovka, you must first name-brand, which is reached just over by PR. A style of work can be any.

Kitsch, for me, it's tasteless. Not even the style of the Roma, who may well be very aware and solid. Not an unusual style, unusual for the perception, namely the lack of taste.