70's, 80's - perspective?

[Зея]

K-Maler, thanks.
Can you tell the names?

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Elek

Sure.

Valuable paintings, weird. You always have to watch the story. In my artists go on up to the time of the Soviet military, and after the war. Deineka undervalued and artists of their generation, but they are difficult to find so they are already in collections abroad. There have auctions and they will go to growth and because the era is unique. Even if you are currently writing on topics rrrevolyutsionnye-this is imitation. Originality and uniqueness are signs buy more expensive.
Why do I think that the nones and pochie not go against, because they podrazhatelskie appropriate that time artists in the West, those who published in Polish and other art journals. I know because it was in my eyes. It's like writing Artual corrected copies for sale. Another reason that the size of non-serious, and the size indicator of skill. Go to the Tretyakov Gallery and see "garde"-entirely small fry in the eyes dazzled. Look famous Western same direction vast proportions. Small size of the lot is always and everywhere amateurs. But no guarantees, if prizhmut to the river, the cover.

Added after 8 minutes

Сообщение от K-Maler

In these workshops reservoir works, intelligent show that perhaps many would be surprised.
This - "Terra Incognita" ...

__________________

 
If you know a call, and it is wishful thinking.

[artcol]

Сообщение от Pavel

Still not serious because the size and the size indicator of skill.

Disputed.
Not in the size of the case.
The artist may not be able to do a large size.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Elek; 2248981"

I have the feeling of a SUBJECTIVE " downstream " at the moment , especially in the 80s.

I think that is rethinking the flow and Shemyakin and unknown become officious , why and tried , but the political conjuncture is reversed and they are in the sand after the tide. Politics is dangerous for artists. Non conformists garde is entirely politically engaged , calculated on tudashnego buyer. Ended policy and there is no interest . All counterproductive.

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от artcol

disputed.
Not in the size of the case.
The artist may not be able to make a large amount.

Sorry, serious people do not care, the large size of this mastery.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Pavel

came to an end and there is no interest in politics.

Auctions show the opposite.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

auction sales of works of these authors show the opposite.

Auctions are fraudulent, unfortunately.

[artcol]

Сообщение от Pavel

Sorry, serious people do not care, the large size of this skill.

All right.
Let us understand each other correctly.
What is "large" in your opinion?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Pavel

Still not serious because the size and the size indicator of skill.
Go to the Tretyakov Gallery and see "garde"-entirely small fry in the eyes dazzled.

For example:

1.
180x180

2.
180x180

3.
175x203

4.
250h194

5.
200h320

6.
196h123

7.
102h127

8.
37h100

9.
202x152

10.
95h195

Добавлено через 54 минуты
And it's really "small fry"?

1.
160h270

2.
106.5 × 200

3.
160h271

5.
240h360

6.
280h390

[Кирилл Сызранский]

And it does " completely small fry "?

1.
160h270

2.
106.5 × 200

3.
160h271

5.
240h360

6.
280h390

[mihailovoh]

Pavel,
Dimensions are indicative and iconic museum quality works. Operation of such a level is not dependent on a time range (the more decades). but such works and sketches edenitsy.Etyudy no less valuable (not in monetary value ..).
I do not agree . The second wave avangarda.kak and pervoy.est izyuminki.kotorye always vostrebovany.prosto much tinsel. Public relations and politicking.