Three paintings.

[Николай Левенко]

Сообщение от west; 1601773"

Is there a chance these films .

I can confidently express their opinions only about a third of work - really to Aivazovsky it has nothing to do , and the artistic value is not.
I agree with intart1, that the signatures and " Savrasov" and " Aivazovsky" written by the same hand. To the plot of the paintings by Aivazovsky appealed repeatedly attaching similar picture under number 2 ( autograph written in the same hand ). Taken for an original work by Aivazovsky " The Black Sea " in 1891 , published in zhunale "Field" for 1891-1893 gg Also attached a picture under the number 3.
By the way, in Vilnius , in the palace Radziwill to February 3, 2013 prrohodit exhibition of marine painter "Hello Sea" , which shows a similar job. A bad image in the photo does not allow to determine its identity brush Aivazovsky.

[Дилетант]

On the picture there is no signature " Savrasov " and " Aivazovsky ". In the pictures is fairly written , " Shoo Savrasov " and " Shoo Aivazovsky" . And, most likely - indeed one hand ( which in this case is logical).
A first work like a copy of one of the many similar Girva still lifes . Something like that.

[west]

Thank You to all the answers.
Consequently, the commercial interest of the picture does not represent?

[Балагур]

Сообщение от intart1

Here the picture is written Savrasov . And the same hand that Aivazovsky .

Yes, there are great fans to sign up , hoping that the buyer will not replace flourish , meaning " Cb " > But , nothing, all the pictures are gone, the main thing - no shade , bet the $ 1500 bucks . Reduce always possible.

[west]

Thanks to answer.
With great sorted out.
Remained still life.

The only thing that took apart is the year 1905.
I ask to speak connoisseurs.

[Беляш]

And what are the chances to be in these pictures?
I do not see any, $ 50 for all three

[Борис Кон]

Сообщение от west

Thank responded . With great sorted out. Remained still life.
The only thing that took apart is the year 1905 . Ask the experts speak .

Still life paintings of the three most hopeless .
I'm so full delintantizm seen here , Terry . Join the opinion of Guriev, in the sense that the "sea" of the best-selling version , in any case, there is small chance. Of course if the landscape translate into decent , proper frame.
The opinion of Mr. Tat is incredibly cruel and too realistic. Although in terms of contemporary realities , it may well be justified.

[Jasmin]

Still life of three pictures , I think is the cutest . <! - ~ 1 ~ -> Even if it is a copy , written as a layman (by the way , where she was gone , her message here so interesting and informative ), it is written professionally , strict color , good composition . If you restore a little bit and pick up the box , it can be sold for good money. <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Jasmin; 2663551 "

Still , of the three pictures , I think is the cutest .

I, too , by the way , and he immediately reminded me illyuchtratsii from the "Book of Tasty and Healthy Food " , there is something in it from " big style " of the Stalin era.

Сообщение от Jasmin; 2663551 "

Amateur (by the way , where she was gone , her message here so interesting and informative )

A Amateur, alas , no questions does not want to answer here , no advice to give. Principle.
This decision she took after she read on the that here has been written about the expert Julia Rybakova .

[west]

Сообщение от Jasmin

Still life of three pictures , I think is the cutest . <! - ~ 1 ~ -> Even if it is a copy , written as a layman (by the way , where she was gone , her message here so interesting and informative ), it is written professionally , strict color , good composition . If you restore a little bit and pick up the box , it can be sold for good money. <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

Thank you. Engaged selection frame.