Modern art - the idea expressed

[DSF]

Сообщение от zarajara

And why would it do ? Arts mean.

The question , of course, interesting <! - ~ 1 ~ -> in the sense of - large and serious.
One thing I can say , art should not just to shock the viewer. To do this, there are much better ways . Shock is used only for you " notice " in order to stand out from the crowd of authors and therefore be able to sell their work more expensive due to greater fame.

[ANATOLY]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky ; 2606171 "

By the way, things Klein in this series go at auction for tens of millions of dollars, and just try to sell things to the 60s of the twentieth century, where

Completely agree with you. Only if you pay , and that art? Or maybe all depends on the human psyche ? A small piece of paper with a homely image and typo ( stamp ) , and Fido on the market are worth a fortune just because singer at the time of negligence is not destroyed and melted the entire issue , and today you teshish pride that you possess thing have in the world only a few people. When MoMA in 95g . purchased 15 paintings G.Rihtera for 3 mln . ( very good money ) only to the love of the art, or the exact cost accounting and assurance that in 2013 " Cathedral ploschad.Milan " will go for 37,100,000 . and how many there are now 15 of these works ? Nothing personal, just -commerce !

Added after 4 minutes

Сообщение от DSF

more opportunity to sell their work at the expense of greater fame.

Just what does this have to do with art?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от ANATOLY; 2607281 "

When the MoMA in 95g . purchased 15 paintings G.Rihtera for 3 mln . ( very good money ) only to the love of the art, or the exact cost accounting and assurance that in 2013 " Cathedral ploschad.Milan " will go for 37,100,000 . and how many there are now 15 of these works ?

The museum is not a commercial organization .

Сообщение от ANATOLY; 2607281 "

Nothing personal, just commerce !

No commerce.

[ANATOLY]

Сообщение от zarajara; 2606101 "

Something is irreparably broken .

Most likely the art of today is at a low point , but it is sure to be uplifting . And that today there are many superficial, so it is natural, seeking to escape the art and tries to push off from the bottom. And time will put everything in its place.

[color="#666686 " ]Added after 7 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky ; 2607351 "

Yes, if you are paying - the art .

And if you have the opposite point of view , not all of the art , for which he paid for?

Added after 14 minutes

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Yes, if you are paying - the art.

That's right, when Vang Gogh could not sell his paintings, it was not art, but when they began to acquire, then turned into an art!

Added after 28 minutes

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

The museum is not a commercial organization.

Is also true.
But people working in museums and we are not talking about the profitability of these paintings.
The museum has created a cost to the artist and someone in their time warning in advance.

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от ANATOLY

That's right, when Vang Gogh could not sell his paintings, it was not art, but when they began to acquire, then turned into art!

That's it!

And the task of investors "see vangogov" before they became VAN Gogh!

[ANATOLY]

Сообщение от NATA NOVA; 2607751 "

That's it !

It is necessary for so many years was wrong , believing that art and the cost though not mutually exclusive things , but a little different from each other. He believed that collecting is not just the love of art, but more profitable investment . But you're right , the site is called investing in art , and not simply the art of painting. And you can invest in anything , as long as profits were . But thank you , I'll know that symphonic music in terms of art is much lower than the performance of pop jester John Doe , because the cost of the ticket below.

Added after 17 minutes

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky ; 2607351 "

Do something interesting and you will buy it .

Did! At the time, bought an apartment for 4 t.dol . , And now she 400t.dol . But I understand that the issue is not profitable to invest and what to buy art , and the theme was set fairly clear - article Kirill Alekseev , " Problems of Art . " On the development of art, rather than investing in it.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от ANATOLY

Did!

So you do not own that apartment built-made.
<! - ~ 1 ~ ->

And I said to the creation of (doing) works of art.

[ANATOLY]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky ; 2608041 "

Yes, and I said to the creation of ( doing) works of art .
__________________

Of course I understand you perfectly . But unfortunately , I can only contemplate and buy what I like. But this case is called a gathering, rather than collecting or even investing in art .

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от ANATOLY

But this case is called a gathering, rather than collecting

Collector - this is the collector.

We Tretyakov, Shchukin, Ostroukhova, Mammoth, Soldatenkova, Bakhrushina Morozova, Botkin, Ryabushinsky Alexeev were meeting works.

[ANATOLY]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Collector - this is a collector.

But often these concepts are separated, and I am a collector myself and priderzhivayus.Nazvat courage is not enough.
You mentioned the names undoubtedly collectors.