Let's discuss the price of Savrasov

[ВЯЧЕСЛАВ]

John Preston Before discussing the price, make the examination in institutions, as you recommended. I am sure you are very disappointed with the results.

[раскатов]

What about the signature?

[Serg987]

Сообщение от John Preston

to present you the two works, if I may, Savrasov.
graphology expert MIA

  Who did handwriting analysis in the Interior Ministry and when? Officially or expert expressed his personal opinion? I am interested for myself, because there is a pattern with two lines of the author's text, and would like to check on that side.

[sergejnowo]

Сообщение от Sandro

John Preston, then we must bear Grabar, or at least in the commercial GTG, and after that had - at a price ".

a couple of times asked another Muscovite, 3-4 years ago to show in commercial GTG pictures and graphics. Everything was humanely, bullshit does not even have to consider - to weed out immediately. Show graphic AK Savrasov, - looked, and said that actually he was told that you can safely sell. To the question, but as there is in writing and so on, said that if anyone should be - let us call. Kopeck not taken, all on the price list.
This is what I have, if it is a real AK Savrasov, - you and say, go and for minimal overhead. And only then can and speak for the certification and there are different tests. Well, if controversial picture - it long and foggy. I would have for himself the disputed Savrasov, as an investment, would not take.: Cool:

[Кирилл Сызранский]

The first picture old woman funny. C a child and dog.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 2 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от sergejnowo

3-4 years ago to show in the commercial State Tretyakov Gallery, paintings and graphics

You testified in the State Tretyakov Gallery in order to make commercial expertise, ie paid as an order from the physical individual.
And now it comes to commercial organizations-Research and an independent examination of them. PM Tretyakov.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 5 minutes[/color]
Sandro, I understand you correctly, you are the organization had in mind when they wrote it?

Сообщение от Sandro

commercial GTG

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от John Preston

to present you the two works, if I may, Savrasov.

Sorry, do not allow. This is not Savrasov. Very weak picture. It makes no sense to pay for expertise. Is that only for the experience.

[nikola]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

Sorry, do not allow. This is not Savrasov. Very weak picture.

They are not just weak, there is even no evidence that people once painted before. Price evenly -0 rub. All the intrigue in the name. Leave your flight of fantasy about the millions of lucky owner of paintings.

Queen - the artist:
- Draw a portrait of me, yes to the neck, I had pearls in her ears - emerald earrings, on his head - a diamond tiara on his hands - the ring and on the wrists - bracelet with sapphires. And to all the stones - larger. And do not forget the gold watch.
- Draw something you can, but why do you?
- You draw, draw ... but I'll hang a portrait of the house. If suddenly I die before her husband, he, the old male, married again - to the young. That they then torment in search of these treasures!

[наследник]

Сообщение от nikola

They are not just weak, there is even no evidence that people once painted before.

Not agree.
  Confirm their rubles. John Preston, for how shall give? Write to the l \ pp.

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от nikola

They are not just weak, there is even no evidence that people once painted before. Price evenly -0 rub. All the intrigue in the name. Leave your flight of fantasy about the millions of lucky owner of paintings.

    
Let them fly. But why Alexei Kondratyevich hurt? Need clear, at least out of respect for the memory of the artist. Perhaps because these images are some of the emerging Russian painting. In museums - that lazy to walk!

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Tjutchev

In museums - that lazy to walk!

Сообщение от Tjutchev

Cyril, I have already mentioned that Savrasov is weak. We are accustomed to the museum things, repeatedly published, those that hang in the Tretyakov Gallery for years. And there are those, like this. I have seen other works of similar quality. Korovin, too, is weak, but present. There is not quite udavshiesya things and other artists. The artist also a human being, not a machine for the production of masterpieces. A Savrasov was a very "human", and nothing human was alien to him. The fate of the artist, which is no longer with us - is "finished product". We have the ability to peer into the details of his life, finding new touches. But to deny the biography of the creator in order to preserve some ideal image, in my opinion, not correct. This picture shows the tragic fate of the artist.
Savrasov such it is, and perhaps that is why he gave us interesting and close. And without this figure history of Russian art would be some sort of incomplete.

Maybe this Savrasov of those? From the "weak", which you saw?