Icon

[Игорь52]

If only the party Gauguin)))))

[redbor]

Сообщение от Zeya ; 2206391"

Where are the spaces on the likah is restored or not , where cracelures ? Default has made such pictures , which do not understand. Oblong face on a photograph and a round on the other, Freaky color .

With flattened face , I took the photo editor to fail .
And the fact that the photo taken " unchildlike equipment" can not see any craquelure , nor, in general, " traces of existence " - this is probably the result of a recent restoration , or 100 years of careful storage in vacuum packaging <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

[Adulter_com]

When performed by a competent technology icons in a good workshop and proper storage conditions , craquelure not a criterion , even after three or four centuries, a finishing bytovaniya.Nebolshoe darkening of the film works on the ground covered with gold and assists, as well as on the background looks pretty convincing , plus minor abrasions is and there are traces of gentle existence.

[Зея]

Сообщение от Adulter_com

The competent technology icons made in a good workshop and proper storage conditions, craquelure not a criterion, even after three or four centuries of existence.

 
But that's bent you!
An example of the studio!
<! - ~ 7 ~ ->

[Adulter_com]

Examples of weight-Just one of the Savior on the Throne Nazary Istomin Savin, as well as see other makrofoto of the largest collections of the country.

[Зея]

Adulter_com, 3.2 show an example.
In this photo, cracelures visible to the naked eye, visible restoration.
And you think that since the 17th century, the icon came to us without chinok, restorations, renovations?
Do not tell.

[redbor]

In the photo from the collection can be seen the icon of Christ on the Throne and fall down Savvaty Zosima of Solovki.
(Circle Nazary Istomin Savin) only in the museum's restoration.
<! - ~ 1 ~ ->.
 
Yet there are examples of?

[тандем]

Сообщение от redbor; 2207141"

In the photo from the collection can be seen

There is a book Restoration of Tempera Painting Easel /Ed. V. Filatov - M. : Visual Arts , 1986
There is very lucidly set out what the the restoration of icons.
The above example is not a restoration, and reconstruction - essentially a remake .
From the same book on craquelure on the icons : - "In the iconography, which is mainly used tempera, good preparation of gesso, a relatively small thickness of the paint layer and especially drying the emulsion binder ( egg yolk ) partially protected the pictorial layer from cracking. As a rule slowly drying elastic chicken egg yolk, oil does not cause cracking of the paint layer "

[Adulter_com]

On a personal painting of the author , neither of which either the global and renovations can be no question - there is a peripheral toning on the background and fields 19 v.muzeynaya raschiska and removing dirt late 20v.Kachestvenny ekpozitsionny vid.Esche repeat for 19. - Developed craquelure not criterion. D . makrofoto in museum exhibitions TG , and YAHM t.d.Restavratory with many years of practice can attest to the real objects live.

[redbor]

Сообщение от Adulter_com

Once again for the 19th century. - Developed craquelure not a criterion

No, like, with this and does not argue And about the 17th, it is better not to say <! - ~ A
~ ->

Let's go back to "our" icon and her two so different pictures.
What about it do you think?