Works Zinaida Serebryakova

[Кирилл Сызранский]

uriart, easy, easy ...
Saw the same: D: D: D?

[Allena]

Сообщение от uriart

Everyone is entitled to their opinion!

Certainly, this is not even discussed! And the more such opinions, the better. However, uriart, you personally do not think maloobyasnimym opinions knowledgeable person in this particular, concrete situation?

[uriart]

I have an opinion on this subject and I have already expressed.
Invite Gorbachev to let the forum here favors. Everyone will be interesting.
You never know what I may seem, I am not a man with regalia. And expert opinions are not issued.

[SAH]

Сообщение от Jenny

"Judging by the play, is the work of Z. Serebryakova high class. But for the final conclusion should be seen
originals ".

Can Gorbachev was tired, could Jenny is bluffing, includes neutral. But the forum at the height of his fuflovoy Serebrya not spend not fooled. : cool:

[Glasha]

Сообщение от Allena

maybe it's their bait is as follows: each and every one of inspiring photos - allegedly the work of high quality, good writer - so then they have a normal examination ordered, and paper to write the true state of affairs ?

Allena, but in my case with some "unknown", he just sent a positive response, while not set to work
(second answer - I have it in the topic "released", literally copied from the personal mail - I have already order the most expertise).

There's something wrong, of course ..

[Jenny]

Allena, which means "to submit the original answer? This is what I already did. Site Dmitry Gorbachev - www.keytoart.org
I also thought that he was encouraged by these words, so I willingly agreed to the examination.
Incidentally, I spoke with Catherine Bonsenn, she did the photographs could not say. She said she wants to look at the work, when it is in Russia.

[Allena]

Jenny, site I, unfortunately, does not open, perhaps, some failure or me, or there. Frankly, I'm at a loss to guess about you received a response. That is not Serebryakov, no doubt, does not cause, and it says sss, obviously, not EKSPERTNOvidno.

Jenny, I'm not in any way do not want to offend you, just explore possible explanations, and obtained a dilemma: whether you own bluff (which apparent reason, it seems to me, no), whether that Something strange happened to the experts.

Now my memory at least 2 examination is very respected institutions, the results are other than temporary insanity expert, I can not explain: in one case, the experts confirmed the authenticity of even quite well-known artist, who correctly called his name, attributed to the names of the absolutely correct biography, only here the name and surname to the names and biographies attributed quite exorbitant (even the initials do not match the one from whom they borrowed the name and curriculum vitae). Another case is even more fun: there is a memory write, or to randomly name initials and middle name were selected, only the author's name, they confirmed, but instead of, say, Pavel Pavlovich (the artist is not very well known, but well defined, and find information about it can, if a little effort to make), written by Porphyry Porfirievich. In short, all those lyrics in order to emphasize that the experts are human, but to err is human ...

And you yourself have tried to compare the work with the standards? To what conclusion reached?

[Glasha]

Сообщение от Allena

says sss, obviously, not EKSPERTNOvidno.

- Yes, one of the memorable quotes))

Allena, here, try, http://www.keytoart.org.ua/russian/Introduction.htm,
meet.

[Allena]

Glasha, thank you! Opened.
I tend to think that the work of Jenny watched someone inexperienced aides to Mr. Gorbachev. He can one carry on a full load.

[ВЯЧЕСЛАВ]

Everything is already there. That's an interesting episode in the context of this controversy.

RESPONSE
Author: Dmitry Gorbachev (Professor)
 
Dear Readers, 49-th issue of the Mirror of the week ", to report that in the article" Russia's Ukrainian father of Futurism "attributed to me words which I have in mind was not. Portrait Shevchenko, reproduced in my article as a work of D. Burliuk, in my opinion, does not apply Burliuk. This is a copy of a famous portrait of Shevchenko in 1871 brush I. Kramskoy.

Not the truth and information, as if the whole world knows Burliuk a Ukrainian artist. It is known that while some ukrainists from different countries. I need a great effort on our part to make the world link the name Russia's father of Futurism with his Ukrainian homeland.