What can you say about these works. Buy?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Tatiana Terent'eva

I can not understand why it is true motocross written separately and with one letter "with"

Not a very educated artist was, like me, a mistake made in writing.

[Amateur]

Сообщение от v_r

With the church's all right. On the back of 69 per year. Churches with crosses in the USSR was not enough. And if the artist wrote the existing churches, because of the cross on the picture could be big trouble.

The Savior Neredice - it is not just a church. Both before and after the war it was considered, including formal, historical and architectural monuments of world importance. Before the war - because of the unique paintings of XII century, survived until 1941 in fact completely and cited in many of the prewar and postwar publications on ancient art (even the color photos were taken). At random could not find host its pre-war photos, but here's the picture of her standing near the Church of Our Savior on Kovalev (also with unique frescoes, and also almost destroyed in the war), the cross is present. As for 1969, then, as in Novgorod in 1968, I remember the crosses on all the ancient churches. This, despite the fact that neither before the war nor after it, these churches have been active and considered as architectural monuments. So in 1969 the cross was definitely, and the artist may well have to portray, not spoiling appearance, if not the temple of God, then at least the historical monument.

[dedulya37]

Сообщение от Amateur

This is despite the fact that neither before the war, nor after it, these churches have been active and considered as architectural monuments. So in 1969 the cross was definitely, and the artist may well have to portray, not spoiling appearance, if not the temple of God, then at least the historical monument.

Believe me, if it was an order "Combine" and crosses would be depicted accurately, regardless of the presence or absence.

[Amateur]

Сообщение от dedulya37

Believe me, if it was an order "Combine" and crosses exactly would be depicted

And what is that such a "factory"?

There is such a wonderful book: Karger, MK Novgorod, Leningrad-Moscow: "Art", 1970 (from the so-called "White Series"). Put into recruitment in 1969 It contains numerous photographs - and pre-and post-war - almost all the churches in Novgorod. Each and every - with crosses. So was the photographer was permissible to depict the church with a cross, but the artist is not? It is difficult to believe: see, for example, now Juon Parade 7 November 1941, where the Cathedral of the Intercession (St. Basil's) - with crosses, from which he, incidentally, never removed, although he said after the revolution was not valid.

[dedulya37]

Сообщение от Amateur

And what is that such a "complex"?

"Combine" - Combine a beautiful art, which gave jobs to artists to perform on-demand pictures of any organization - libraries, hospitals, rest homes, farm, etc.

Сообщение от Amateur

So was the photographer was permissible to depict the church with a cross, but the artist is not?

Photographers and artists still differ on the tasks performed.
If the photographer illyustrituet article, his task as precisely as possible to show the described object.
The artist has the right to change the object size, color, shape, etc., based on personal perception of the object.
My father, for example, depicts the church, sought to emphasize religion and inaccessibility of the infinity of God in human understanding.
Exaggeration, one can say, "what is it that for the frame?"

[Amateur]

Submitted by you, dedulya37, picture of your father - is incomparably better work Semeniuk. In its composition and colors chosen so well that the church seems to this temple, which is merging with the sky and, together with the (sinful) of land, a link connecting them, or, if you will, by. Full image domes here would just be superfluous: here it is, because of their dark color, only prevent the impression of the merger and "oppressed" to the church. In reality, it may not "oppressed" would be, but we see reality as a three-dimensional image, for us the real domes are separated in space, and the picture - a two-dimensional image. Nothing like in the Semeniuk no, I at least do not see.

[dedulya37]

Сообщение от Amateur

picture of your father - is incomparably better work SEMENIUC

I beg you, I am totally against the comparison of different artists.
They like all artists, but different.
For example: tomatoes and cucumbers - vegetables, but no one is in the head does not come to compare them.

[Amateur]

Сообщение от dedulya37

I am totally against the comparison of different artists.

Yes I do, actually, is also against the comparison artists with each other. But in this case, I compared the is not art , and two of their work. There may in fact be the case, that one job (subjectively) more, while the other - weaker (and in some other pairs of pictures - on the contrary), the more so as compared to a similar picture painted theme.