Сообщение от Sergeyitch
This phrase of reproach in his voice, that all used to seeing the reality, do not mean to try to discern not the reality?
That's right, Sergeyitch
, very even implies struggling implies, that is right about that saying! But there is no reproach, and there is no trace and no! There is thought and thought how to explain better, but everything has been said Oleg Nazarov
: there are photographers who shoot for a passport (that there really must be hard to divine reality, because to know yourself on a passport just can not
), and is the art of photography, in which reality is transformed or even create something new, not yet ex , so to speak, another reality or not reality. And between these two directions has nothing to do
, except the camera.
Nobody is trying to discern the reality of abstract painting, and if they try, then see again something of their own, what he tells his imagination, education, etc., etc. And in the photos can be Vasya Pupkin, can be Perov or Repin, and can be a Kandinsky or de Stael!
Photographs of straight-line mapping of reality has nothing to do
, is high, it is extremely difficult and fantastically diverse art work is created with light, the author's imagination, the author's knowledge in so many areas, God only knows what kind of chemistry and, most importantly , the identity of the author.
Yes, this absolutely does not matter what is shown - an abstraction, or a birch tree on the lawn, or a man on the stairs. In any genre pictures are true masterpieces.
Here are just now thought: perhaps, picture is not as widespread and underestimated in the market precisely because it is still "narrow circle" of those who see in it a true art.