I would like to know

[spaiki]

(((((((((((((

[danvik]

Perhaps this is a copy of Ryabushkin

[spaiki]

danvik, well, and for how much it can sell?

[Жар-птица]

According to the plot is very similar to Ryabushkin, and suddenly the original :-)
Price for his work in "Artists" on this site.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Firebird, you at least put smiles ... By theme seriously you will understand the price will be interested.

[наследник]

Gentlemen

With all due respect to you I write these lines ..
I looked, before you come to the forum, a lot of different themes.
Experience has gathered, allegory and allusions contemplate.
When these things to you personally, do not belong, then treat them more appropriately, I suppose.
Because in the "heat" sell greed begins to obscure the eyes, and you're mad at the man who gently hinted to you that thing "on an amateur and you're, in essence, a single ruble for it did not get.
But you begin to fully trust what anyone saw in the support and hope. Although he only wrote that "something interesting".
To me, these feelings are still very fresh, and I understand very well how to perceive and rating and the number to say thank you and the ranking of site visitors ordinary newcomers who have the problem, and something - write a "help" and wait for that "uncle" all over He will find, identify, advise ...
One Zhorik - an entire encyclopedia of these feelings, bordering on the absolute belief in compulsory care and confirmed the value of exhibited items.
And yet ... A thousand apologies ... why not just tell people that his thing is of no artistic interest.
Indeed, in most cases it is even seen me.
Here's an example with this picture.
Do you think that keeping people in blissful ignorance more humanely than the right to express their opinion about the artistic merits of the work presented?
Or is it still a fear that rare error that could undermine the credibility of the conquered?
Of course, these are my views more humanistic-abstract nature, rather than practical application.
But, in fact, if I am - an amateur, I see that this initiative of the deaf, but I read that it could be some interesting artists with the name, what would you have me thinking about common sense and cultural orientations?
I'm not talking about complicated for assessments of naive art or modernists.
I mean - in our case - a specific thing that anyone can look in the first post and make its verdict.
So my naive question-pochenu this happen?
What do you consider more productive - for the amateur "or" good only hole on the wall to close?

[uriart]

heir, quite agree with you!
No need to keep people hope that maybe it would be original.
Sometimes I am rude in their responses.
But, frankly, it's better for crude and truth, rather than "soft" to lie and do not deprive a person of joy of hope.
Why? All the same, if a person wants to sell it without examination will not sell. And then everything cleared up.

[Konstantin]

So my naive question-pochenu this happen?

Even now, you do not simply say that this picture is garbage, and deployed. Psychology simple, looked and saw that nonsense and I thought - why klatsat the keys? Or someone is Set for you, and say, or so and come down.
And when this question will sound in the 10 th, for the hundredth time? And you pass by, to more interesting topics. And then the way answers are soft on humanity forumchan perceive the child as an amateur, which simply something neutral to say, not to pester, than to give to Priest.

[наследник]

Konstantin, so be it. But you would prefer an accurate diagnosis or the word "self pass"?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от spaiki

is a picture of her for many years 50 exactly, but we do not know her name and who drew it

What's the answer? Title knows who else? And the author? I-no ...