AN? Stepanov

[мистер-у]

These are not my words, this deystvitelnost.Sprosite have Uriata he should know this work.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

heir, soon to Vakulenko for attribution!

[наследник]

... Logic can be assessed, not even looking at the pictures.

So what we have?

There are three artists - Stepanov, Dyukammen, Kollinos.

There are six paintings with sotvetstvuyuschimi signatures of our defendants.
We graphology, so let us assume that the signatures are made by different people.
That is, as if actually there are three of the artist.

There are six stories, written by these artists. According to the two brothers.
Even e image ... clear that all the pictures of these authors have similar small parts.
Sometimes I just amazing, one in one!
For example, the place of a gull in Stepanova and Kollinosa in subjects with rapid sea ..
The style of writing of stones on the shore, waves and other fairly accurate likeness.

Читать дальше... 

Taking into account the year of writing picture Stepanov - 1905
Year of Birth Ducommun reported by redbor, - 1920
can eliminate the assumption that a recurring theme and style of another.
The first could not, the second was no sense "remember" some Stepanova.

About personal data Kollinos we still do not know.

But suppose that he was a contemporary of Stepanov.
  And the same reason - Why the little-known artists to reproduce scenes of each other, coinciding in the details that different people and do not take into account? the more so, most likely, they lived in different places, and can be, and countries - judging by the names and signatures on the paintings.

Nevertheless, this is an obvious fact - that these "little things" in all the pictures of different authors.
as a fingerprint of one person.

So, if to be logical, it is necessary to make a clear conclusion - all three paintings to be painted by the same author.

It can be argued that the marina are often somewhat similar to each other - in composition, in the manner of one school of artists.
But, I remind you - it is about coincidences in the minor details!

  ... Who is that N /X?
One, at least in three persons.
Ultimately, it is not so important, because a special talent, judging by the pictures, it is no different.

Why was this done?
Hard to say.
If history had been similar cases and their background uncovered, but I do not know.

However, there is one thing. "
In the frames of paintings Stepanova - inscribed nameplates, and paintings were purchased in 1905 at an exhibition in St. Petersburg.

Perhaps this speaks of the entourage of a peculiar pattern of attribution.
In our case, to legalize a couple of pictures through the "quiet" exhibition, and then sell the pictures of the famous and expensive whereas A. Stepanova to some provincial merchant or industrialist.
Moreover, there are some slightly clumsy "similarity" in the signatures - my Stepanova and A. Stepanov.

... Of course, I would like to think that my Stepanov - Russian artist Alexander Stepanov, moreover, that biography is suitable, but - alas! - Expectations of young men fed.
  And I came out of this wonderful age.: Shy:

... However, perhaps someone in my reasoning see izyan, on the authority of which I was not offended, but I will only appreciate bezvozdmezdno .

  To say thanks for every selection?: Shy:

Stepanov
Вложение 157625Вложение 157635

Kollinos
Вложение 157765Вложение 157775

Dyukammen
Вложение 157785Вложение 157795

[наследник]

The fact that we write as Collianos, actually = Collianov.
At least, the last letter is absolutely sure - not s.
Of course, does little, but still ...

[redbor]

Сообщение от heir

Collianos, actually = Collianov

Collianos, this is the same type of muddy, as Dyukammon,
Either you are with a gang, or actually the same thing. Nil, as they have signed well-known paintings, or recur, or, sometimes, so different in quality that even I can see that no one could draw Dyukamen also poloho.
as well.
heir,, and my opinion, you should not put on a par with incomprehensible Dyukammon-Kolianos glorious name Stepanova.
He has to name at least initial, and hence the name, is,
  negovorya nothing about the badge on the frames of paintings.

[наследник]

Сообщение от redbor

He has to name at least initial, and hence the name is,
not to mention the badge on the frames of paintings.

That, and rejoice
But, frankly, damn interesting to understand - how reliable is my guess.
  I am not an art, it is may be wrong, so all waiting weighty conclusions from reputable forumchan-at least half the certainty that they have drawn on the clover. In that sense, are similar or not these artists? Could it be one person?

[Артём]

Сообщение от heir

There are three artists - Stepanov, Dyukammen, Kollinos.

    Heir! These are all guys, so much alike that can bother a long time. If not the date, I would say that this is our contemporary, Alexander Stepanov.

[наследник]

Сообщение от Artem

If it were not for the date, I would say that this is our contemporary, Alexander Stepanov.

If it were not for date and signature, then I would say that half the paintings are not Roerich wrote, but my friend

So, we Artem agreed - to hell with them all marine painters. We turn to the still-lifes!

[Сергеич]

Artem A beautiful picture. Live, also looks like?

[Артём]

Сообщение от Sergeyitch

A beautiful picture. Live, also looks?

    In Yalta, writes S. Barkovsky, and in Sevastopol V. Transfiguration. Summer on the waterfront all worth it. No - it's all wrong!