Старый 11.01.2016, 17:35 Язык оригинала: Русский       #161
Гуру
 
Аватар для Vladimir
 
Регистрация: 20.03.2008
Сообщений: 8,085
Спасибо: 3,353
Поблагодарили 25,442 раз(а) в 5,540 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 250
Репутация: 23523
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Кирилл Syzran Посмотреть сообщение
Opening are ongoing and often new authors appeared, seems like only yesterday, already go to the secondary market and at auction escapes them things periodically update their personal records.
Discoveries happen, but you have to be very careful. I the corner of my eye looking at the auction market of works Jacob Kessy. In 2012 it was the brightest star of the generation under 30 years old. http://artinvestment.ru/invest/ratin...er_thirty.html the Artist interesting, memorable things, support an impressive gallery. But. In 2011, working height 1.2 meters cost about $ 200,000. And in 2014-2015, - about 100 000 @ - $ 130,000. That's fine too - indicates a relatively healthy situation. And yet confirms that "взлет rocket" for investment in young stars is not guaranteed. On the other hand in the relatively recent times of the same Banksy was worth nothing and many aroused more irritation. And now over 250 000 @- 500 000 easily.
__________________
AI в Telegram: https://t.me/artinvestmentru

AI на Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/artinvestment



Vladimir вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Старый 11.01.2016, 18:34 Язык оригинала: Русский       #162
Гуру
 
Аватар для Vladimir
 
Регистрация: 20.03.2008
Сообщений: 8,085
Спасибо: 3,353
Поблагодарили 25,442 раз(а) в 5,540 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 250
Репутация: 23523
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Кирилл Syzran Посмотреть сообщение
Here, as with investing in startups - will Fund ten, one shot and pay it off. Only instead of nine unsuccessful parts of the project, you have the work of nine young artists who may shoot later.
Several years ago we took the first Christie's auction in 2008 and figured, what would happen if a hypothetical investor would stupidly bought the entire auction or at least all the top-лоты indiscriminately? http://artinvestment.ru/invest/analy...isk_antik.html I mean, the cost of investment, given the risk that some artists can fall out of art history and the market. That's what happened:

Цитата:
According to my estimates, three million dollars invested in 13 of the most expensive works at auction in 1998, the virtual has become to our time at 29.3 million dollars. Almost a tenfold increase. Even if we put aside the exceptional case with "Candle" by Gerhard Richter, two million art-инвестиций would have made a 13.5 million of revenue. In any case, the hypothesis about a waste of money evidence to support it.
__________________
AI в Telegram: https://t.me/artinvestmentru

AI на Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/artinvestment



Vladimir вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо Vladimir за это полезное сообщение:
Старый 12.01.2016, 10:12 Язык оригинала: Русский       #163
Гуру
 
Аватар для Vladimir
 
Регистрация: 20.03.2008
Сообщений: 8,085
Спасибо: 3,353
Поблагодарили 25,442 раз(а) в 5,540 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 250
Репутация: 23523
По умолчанию on acquisitions and losses

What can you recall of a new (or well forgotten old). Until 2014 for some artists now liquid virtually no auction market, or it was in its infancy. There was no market Sidur, Voroshilov, an old friend, and several others. But collectors liked a @- and the market responded. The sales are on working prices.

But are there examples of extinction. A few years ago rattled the name of Andrey Golikova - installations with oil. In 2007-2008, the prices for his work have shot at the mark of 30 000 @50 000 ndash dollars. Now look @extreme ndash the sale was in 2014 for $ 8,000 About the artist as-то not heard. Maybe a temporary lull, and maybe something else.
__________________
AI в Telegram: https://t.me/artinvestmentru

AI на Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/artinvestment



Vladimir вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо Vladimir за это полезное сообщение:
John Preston (12.01.2016)
Старый 13.01.2016, 15:23 Язык оригинала: Русский       #164
Гуру
 
Аватар для Vladimir
 
Регистрация: 20.03.2008
Сообщений: 8,085
Спасибо: 3,353
Поблагодарили 25,442 раз(а) в 5,540 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 250
Репутация: 23523
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от mihailovoh Посмотреть сообщение
the meaning of investment .anything (including art).What is the rating things in a few years ????
It is possible that in the period of uncertainty should not focus on profitability, and liquidity - that is, the ability for things to be quickly resold, even at a substantial discount. Now, many buyers put a liquidity almost on the first place. I'll think about how to rank the most liquid of artists in the database (the share of sold from the number offered for sale). But in principle, the list (not rank) you can try together to make and so, according to-памяти. Try?
__________________
AI в Telegram: https://t.me/artinvestmentru

AI на Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/artinvestment



Vladimir вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо Vladimir за это полезное сообщение:
манна (13.01.2016)
Ответ

Метки
investing in paintings

Опции темы
Опции просмотра

Ваши права в разделе
Вы не можете создавать новые темы
Вы не можете отвечать в темах
Вы не можете прикреплять вложения
Вы не можете редактировать свои сообщения

BB коды Вкл.
Смайлы Вкл.
[IMG] код Вкл.
HTML код Выкл.

Быстрый переход

Похожие темы
Тема Автор Разделы Ответов Последние сообщения
how to invest $ million Artdealer Investing in Art 24 13.06.2008 13:00





Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 11:22.
Telegram - Обратная связь - Обработка персональных данных - Архив - Вверх


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Перевод: zCarot