Who's Online

[художник Федотов]

Really modern, adequate person can seriously believe in "figures" of statistics, koi sites offer us??? ...
<! - ~ 7 ~ ->

[Андрей Жданов]

Most anonymous visitors - visitors that came with the image search .
I just found this site and forum , was looking at the Old artist on the internet, found a picture , went to the page , read . Once, twice , third, and drawn into <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

So no need to run down Anonymus - each of them is a potential participant .

[Grigory]

Сообщение от artist Fedotov

They did a circulation of 100 thousand copies gloss ... 70%immediately disposed of ...

In most cases, do not do that.
Simply print the desired circulation, why pay extra for printing run.
Claimed circulation (in the output) and real, not all publications coincides ...
<! - ~ 1 ~ ->

[Магнолия]

Сообщение от zarajara

Even anecdote appeared: buddylist as pens, out of 100 only a few pieces of writing.

...
and those - pencils.

[Владимир Владимирович]

Сообщение от Magnolia

and those - pencils.

And the couple, the three trolls to boot!
<! - ~ 7 ~ ->

[художник Федотов]

Grigory, statistics in this area do not keep to this there are other organizations ... But they say it is well-known magazines with a circulation of serious so do not on their natural stupidity, but at the whim of "serious" advertisers who had to witness all the printed products in the printing ... It is much more advantageous in that situation , economically , print edition stated than reputable advertisers lose ... Of course , this applies to more publications with foreign names and times of crisis (and it is permanent : go from one thing - move to another) , then plummeting circulation Advertisement dependent editions ... And everyone is happy , no one hurt : typography loaded, printed edition , advertisers 'success' advertised ... What 's wrong with that ? ? .. .

[Магнолия]

Сообщение от artist Fedotov ; 2927581"

Really modern, adequate person can seriously believe in the " figures " of statistics, koi sites offer us ? ? ? ...

Сообщение от Andrei Zhdanov , 2927661"

Most anonymous visitors - visitors that came with the image search .
I just found this site and forum , was looking at the Old artist on the internet, found a picture , went to the page , read . Once, twice , third, and drawn into

So no need to run down Anonymus - each of them is a potential participant .

Computer calculation shows that the information appearing on the site of the forum , is very important for Internet users.

Friends , we are proud and keep up the good work!

[Маруся]

" Hmehno ? " ( as my small nephew )
Sorry , gentlemen, but I somehow felt that
Nikolai Levenko, joking - well, I " laughed too Whatever you say in a humorous conversation "

I understand that in every joke there is only a part of joke
Well, consider that these " guests - unregistered users " - Christmas carols in front of the door as you do not close them ? (smile )

[Николай Левенко]

Сообщение от Maroussia

I'm sorry, gentlemen, but I somehow felt that

Nicholas Levenko joked, - well, I "laughed too Whatever you say in humorous conversation"

Thank you for understanding.

[NATA NOVA]

Сообщение от artist Fedotov

Grigory, statistics in this area do not keep to this there are other organizations ... But they say it is well-known magazines with a circulation of serious so do not on their natural stupidity and at the whim of "serious" advertisers who had to witness all the printed products in the printing ... It is much more advantageous in that situation , economically , print edition stated than reputable advertisers lose ... Of course , this applies to more publications with foreign names and time of crisis (and it is permanent : go from one thing - move to another) , then plummeting circulation Advertisement dependent editions ... And everyone is satisfied , no one hurt : typography loaded, printed edition , advertisers 'success' to advertise ... what 's wrong with that ??? ...

Just not fair . This had not occurred ? ?

Added after 3 minutes

Сообщение от NATA NOVA

simply dishonest.

Not correct to say: "shady" .. (morally)