A question for connoisseurs of inventory (account) numbers.

[Дмитрий Николаевич]

Сообщение от Fed; 2085231"

The significance of this fact , no .
There may be a worse example .

I understand that. But it may be , for example, Sheremetyev .
That is why I am interested in an account number. As a child I saw the collection. And, for example, looking at the work Sheremetyev , albeit very roughly , but they like to say ( I mean other fabrics, instead of this daub ). Also, the relatives are still alive who saw the collection in full. Let me remind you that the work was , in my opinion , the highest quality with the signatures of the authors.
Do not give a link to where you can see the work Sheremetyeva ?

Сообщение от Fed; 2085231"

Those who wish to explore the depths are in the X-ray study with a 5 euro and explore .

Immediately apologize for delitansky question, but it can be paid in any health center or to go to specializes in painting. If, in the latter, then , tell me the address , or give a link to the Internet.

[Дилетант]

Сообщение от Dmitry N. ; 2085321"

Right sorry for delitansky question

Well, amateurish question - and answer Amateurs <! - ~ 1 ~ ->.
Make high-quality X-ray in Moscow you can on the street, Bryansk , in the research laboratory of the Museum of Modern Art. ( Ul.Bryanskaya for TC " European "). Tel. 8499240 31 46
(For 5 € - it is apocryphal. Exact price now, I will not say I do not remember . But all the questions you answer correctly and politely on the phone) .
You can also order a professional macro photography and infrared reflektografiyu . The equipment in the laboratory - a great , quality of work - too. The only drawback - there is nowhere to park , place a bit too glib ...
P.S. Contact us about this in the medical center does not recommend it. The specificity is different, no experience , a shooting mode other.

[redbor]

Dmitri!

Do not bother the achievements of science.
Just ask a specialist to remove the top layer of paint,

even if the box in the corner and all becomes clear.
In any event, this painting is worth nothing.
 
A chance to appreciate it on a 3 trillion

[Дилетант]

Сообщение от redbor; 2085451"

Dmitry !
Do not bother the achievements of science . Just ask a specialist to remove the top layer of paint

Indeed, why spend phlebological research when you can just cut a piece of his feet , and see what's out there for any problems with the veins ...
Redbor, well, like Dmitri understand. A hunting - it is known to forest captivities .

[Дмитрий Николаевич]

Сообщение от dabbler; 2085401"

Well, amateurish question - and answer a dilettante.

+ 1000

Сообщение от dabbler; 2085401"

Make high-quality X-ray in Moscow you can on the street, Bryansk, in the research laboratory of the Museum of Modern Art. (Ul.Bryanskaya for TC "European"). Tel. 8 499 240 31 46
(For 5 euros - is apocryphal. Exact price now, I will not say I do not remember. But all the questions you answer correctly and politely on the phone).
You can also order a professional macro photography and infrared reflektografiyu. The equipment in the laboratory - a great, quality of work - too. The only drawback - there is nowhere to park, place a bit too glib ...
P.S. Contact us about this in the medical center does not recommend it. The specificity is different, no experience, a shooting mode other.

It just so happened that before reading your post, I looked to the nearest medical center. Talked to the radiologist. There are exactly the same apparatus as in the examination. He has, as I suspected, there was only one issue - the exposure time. At home I somehow easier. Very little free time. And at the center, in particular due to problems with parking, I try to ride as little as possible.
I think proceed as follows.
First, after the holidays, make an X-ray in the medical center. I understand that it is not the highest quality. But for him it will be possible to assess what's down there - daub or not. And if there is something interesting, then, and will return to the Bryansk.
Approve?
Exposure does not tell me?

Added after 3 minutes

Сообщение от redbor; 2085451"

Do not bother the achievements of science . Just ask a specialist to remove the top layer of paint,
even if the box in the corner and all becomes clear .

And where it can be done ?

Сообщение от redbor; 2085451"

In any event, this painting is worth nothing.
A chance to appreciate it on a 3 trillion

Yes , I understand perfectly .
And what better to clear the square , or the radiographs ?

[redbor]

Open - faster, safer and cheaper.
But you can see on the x-ray nastoreny.
It would be justified if the track is drawn from top to something.

[Дмитрий Николаевич]

For you to open, it is a trifling matter.
But once again I remind you that you did not talk with an expert's level, but with a cheerleader, that is,
with me!

So where is the "faster, safer and cheaper" to do?

I beg you to explain, maybe I'll do something, and more.

[Fed]

" The exposure time is determined by the dose of radiation incident on the film, and depends on several factors (the values ​​of anode voltage, tube current , focal length ), for each specific installation -defined individually. "
There are some data: 30 kV , 5 mA with an exposure of about 2 minutes.
It should be counted .

[redbor]

Сообщение от "Dmitry N.; 2085911 '

So, where is" faster, safer and cheaper "to do?

I beg you to explain, maybe I'll do something, and more.

Make an X-ray already, and if not satisfied with the results, I can give the phone a restorer.

You are, after all, in Moscow?

[Дмитрий Николаевич]

Сообщение от redbor; 2086451"

Make an X-ray already, and if not satisfied with the results , I can give the phone a restorer .
You are , after all , in Moscow?

Yes.
Phone, unless you hard , throw in the PM.

Posted 2 minutes

Сообщение от Fed; 2085951"

" The exposure time is determined by the dose of radiation incident on the film, and depends on several factors (the values ​​of anode voltage, tube current , focal length ) for each particular facility is determined individually. "
There are some data: 30 kV , 5 mA with an exposure of about 2 minutes.
It should be counted .

Thank you very much . I think this will be enough . Unless, of course linear dependence .