"Beloved Stalin - the happiness of the people!"

[Евгений]

Сообщение от Stalevar

that already offered for this picture

Authenticity of Yakovlev can be extremely expensive, there is information on the forum look.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 5 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Stalevar

As it turned out, the paintings of Stalin no

There are many, but you can find and interesting portraits.

[SAH]

Сообщение от Stalevar

Gentlemen, it is time to have a normal to evaluate paintings under the heading "Assessment".

I admit it, casually looked at the date and at personazh.Dlya me they all look the same. I think that from 500 up to $ 2000 given the crisis. This assessment is suitable?

[Евгений]

Сообщение от SAH

I think that from 800 up to $ 2000 given the crisis. This assessment is suitable?

You're right, it's real price. (If the copy)

[Самвел]

Сообщение от Stalevar

Do you think that this painting is worth $ 100, less of average landscape? In general, why is such a fantastically low prices?

It was this work, it seems to me not worth anything, but may be working with Stalin, and for $ 10000-50000. It is not necessary because there is nothing no, I do not argue I just think so.

[Сталевар]

Сообщение от SAH

I admit it, casually looked at the date and at personazh.Dlya me they all look the same. I think that from 500 up to $ 2000 given the crisis. This assessment is suitable?

The point is not that "good to me." The thing is a realistic estimate of the picture.
Thank you.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 2 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Samvel

It is this work, it seems to me not worth anything, but may be working with Stalin, and for $ 10000-50000. It is not necessary because there is nothing no, I do not argue I just think so.

Also thanks for the opinion.
But let remind that the portraits of Stalin were removed after the exposure of the cult of personality.
Find a course all you can. But I rarely work that would meet with Stalin, but if you find something worth robust design.

[SAH]

Сообщение от Stalevar

The thing is a realistic estimate of the picture.

Сообщение от Samvel

It was this work, it seems to me not worth anything

Сообщение от Samvel

It is not necessary because there is nothing no, I do not argue I just think so.

I confess, too, thought so.

[Сталевар]

So maybe I will give someone work with Stalin, that "no value"? I'll hang on the wall.

And how do you distinguish a work, "where there is something" and where "nothing"?

Here the work of Vasily Yakovlev, who are interested.

[Самвел]

Сообщение от Stalevar

And how do you distinguish a work, "where there is something" and where "nothing"?

Unfortunately not explain it to you I can not, because I do not know, it just turns independently of me. Here the work of Vasily Yakovlev's certainly worth it, and can even be done.

[Сергеич]

But let remind that the portraits of Stalin were removed after the exposure of the cult of personality.
Find a course all you can. But I rarely work that would meet with Stalin, but if you find something worth robust design.

By this logic, the main thing in the portrait of a personality which portrayed? And not the quality or the name of the artist? This is certainly not the case. Portraits NH are difficult. Stalin agreed to certain personality cult, but they are likely to still picture or photo. And the money they have not much.
Stalevar why do you ask how much it costs? You yourself experienced person.

[Сталевар]

Сообщение от Sergeyitch

According to this logic, the main thing in the portrait of a personality which portrayed? And not the quality or the name of the artist? This is certainly not the case. Portraits NH are difficult. Stalin agreed to certain personality cult, but they are likely to still picture or photo. And the money they have not much.
Stalevar why do you ask how much it costs? You yourself experienced person.

I wanted to still know the views of specialists, I myself am a beginner and a lot of things I do not know-that and decided to ask.
Of course, the quality and /or name of the artist play a great role. But the object of representation is also not a little important, agree.

I would like to thank everyone for the answers and opinions. Still, the picture is not an ordinary and quite difficult to assess.

[color="# 666686"]Posted 11 minutes[/color]
If anyone interesting topic or painting Vasily Yakovlev, here's some of his paintings:
http://artinvestment.ru/auctions/16010/works.html

On this, I think topic is closed.
All thanks.