Moscow landscape, identify the author

[sergejnowo]

Help identify the author of Moscow's landscape .
Cardboard /oil , 32 x 52 cm, n /s .
Left, bottom " possessory title " "Moskau 1955 "
Shows part of the Great Stone Bridge , view from Prechistenskaya embankment towards the Kremlin .
Modern look with Google, it is a pity that the item /angle , where there was a painter, failed to catch .

[K-Maler]

Сообщение от sergejnowo

cardboard /canvas, 32 x 52 cm, n /s.

Left, bottom "possessory title"

What a good job straight flawless ...
But why not the author's signature, and there is only an indication of what it is ...
what is strange.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от sergejnowo

Cardboard

Сообщение от K-Maler

But why is not the author's signature

On the back of the cardboard there are no inscriptions, marks??

[тата]

Сообщение от sergejnowo

Help identify the author of Moscow's landscape .
Cardboard /oil , 32 x 52 cm, n /s .
Left, bottom " possessory title " "Moskau 1955 "
Shows part of the Great Stone Bridge , view from Prechistenskaya embankment towards the Kremlin .
Modern look with Google, it is a pity that the item /angle , where there was a painter, failed to catch .

Search artists need in the direction of former association OST work 50s , for sure. The manner of the average , but it can be N. Shifrin , and more likely Constantine Vyalov to work - there is a chance . Look how similar in composition ( as a strictly architecture painted ) . Yes, and in the manner it is, overall . And the fact that there is no signature , so only confirm harder and authorship attitude it has not. Seen his work , as well as hundreds of other artists without it .

[sergejnowo]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran

On the flip side if there is no cardboard anything inscriptions, marks?

cardboard dry and brittle, pasted on modern plywood.

I'm afraid to peel, cardboard pricked art showered.

[тата]

Сообщение от sergejnowo

cardboard dry and brittle, pasted on modern plywood.

I'm afraid to peel, cardboard pricked art crumbles.

Thin cardboard such huh?
And is there a stamping mimics the texture of the canvas, which may have not recorded a piece of the edge or between strokes?

[sergejnowo]

Сообщение от acetate

cardboard thin so yes?

Yes, the thickness of about 0.8 mm, for me, is a thick wax (at least on the reverse side) paper.

[тата]

Сообщение от sergejnowo

yes, the thickness of about 0.8 mm, for me, is a thick wax (low back) paper.

Usually face glued tissue paper (sometimes several layers), and then removed, but it restorers, and so you can spoil, and all of a sudden on the back that no, there is a risk of damage, always.

[K-Maler]

Сообщение от acetate ; 2862741"

Look at how similar in composition ( as a strictly architecture painted ) . Yes, and in the manner it is, overall . And the fact that there is no signature , so only confirm harder and authorship attitude it does not

Yes , I agree, looks and style to build a composition accurately and at the same time vigorously and confidence throughout. If there is a hint of texture similar to the canvas, in any case not to tear off , with this invoice always crumbled . There's a ground that " pulls " ( binder of paints ) and so there is no coupling layer with him ...
Signature can be X-rayed ?

[sergejnowo]

Сообщение от acetate

more likely Constantine Vyalov

You're right, no doubt it.

Bow to you and thank you.

Сообщение от K-Maler

If there is a hint of texture similar to canvas

yes

Сообщение от K-Maler

in any case not to tear off

already know <! - ~ 4 ~ ->

oh hand to ....
<! - ~ 8 ~ ->

Added after 1 minutes

Сообщение от K-Maler

Signature can be X-rayed?

in this case is not so important - love, took on the wall.