So does the modern artist to be able to draw?

[Buscador]

Сообщение от Posav

Actual work different.

We are here on the ability to draw and at S, the obvious problems.

Сообщение от Wladzislaw

Have you watched too many movies about Soviet Russia's nobility

I do not think that Allena draws information from the movies. This is the ancestral roots, literature, etc.

Сообщение от Eugene

Memoirs of Pavel Chistyakov. (

That's right, there is need to plow, seeking perfection in the picture ...

Сообщение от Wladzislaw

does not depict them simply because that they are not interested.

In most cases (not all of course) just say so. And you ask them something to draw - will hear the same - not interested.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Allena

and the literature just then.

In-in, and literary institutions have not been on the "writers" is not taught.
Count Leo Tolstoy was a captain of artillery in general.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 7 minutes[/color]

Сообщение от Buscador

In most cases (not all of course) just say so. And you ask them something to draw - will hear the same - not interested.

Picasso, for example, was a good draftsman and scribbling constantly, even during lunch, dinner, and often visitors at the neighboring tables and gave them pictures!

[dedulya37]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

during the dinners

Anyone who has watched Tsereteli during various meetings, when he has to attend and did not speak, he could see that he was always something sketched on a piece of paper.

[Wladzislaw]

Сообщение от Allena

Yeah. And there are mumuarnaya literature, diaries - and just literature of that time .

This nebylo so commonplace as it seems.

Most, but if we discard the western province of RI, then 80 percent of Russia's nobility - and the kind of people that received a knighthood for his services (made more in the 3rd part of the DRC than in 2-w), shared in the same living on a salary for their service and balancing border wealth. Revenue for private tutors, music and painting was not enough.

[Allena]

Сообщение от Wladzislaw

It was not so widespread as it seems.

Of course, you're right, it would be ridiculous to assert that belong to the nobility automatically mean absolute financial well-being. At the same time, knowledge of languages, music, the foundations of drawing was not an exceptional phenomenon. No capitation, yes - but quite normal. This was part of home education, and of course, such knowledge possible tried to give to children.

[Pavel]

Artist nedolzhen anyone or anything. He must have a unique talent. Понятие " современный" не существует, как и молодой художник. Only talent defines the artist. Picasso - modern or not? Matisse-modern? But this work is to identify talent and highly-paid for it, too, need talent.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Wladzislaw

income for private tutors, music and painting was not enough.

Main teacher of children was their mother.

[Buscador]

Сообщение от Pavel

Artist nedolzhen anyone or anything. He must have a unique talent. The concept of "modern" does not exist, as a young artist. Only talent defines the artist. Picasso - modern or not? Matisse-modern? But this work is to identify talent and highly-paid for it, too, need talent.

Do not bother to read the name of the theme? A modern here means - our contemporary ...

[Wladzislaw]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

main teacher of children was their mother.

Yes, but who taught her?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Wladzislaw

Yes, but who taught her?

Family circumstances: either her own mother, or a hostel or institution. For example, the noble young ladies.