Could Aivazovsky subscribe so?

[progress-arte]

Dear connoisseurs !

Here is an example of the proposed one antique salon Aivazovsky, where the signature is in doubt. Painting issued as 1850 -60s , the motive - no marina .
And such speculation : could unreasonable holder works for more " credibility " to take da maestro himself to sign ? She - a red-brown color .

[Николай Левенко]

Сообщение от progress-arte; 3062541"

Dear experts !

Here is an example of the proposed one antique salon Aivazovsky, where the signature is in doubt. Painting issued as 1850 -60s , the motive - no marina .
And such speculation : could unreasonable holder works for more " credibility " to take da maestro himself to sign ? She - a red-brown color .

It is a reasonable doubt. This signature does not belong Aivazovsky . As for the work itself , it questioned its authorship is the very fact that it is the seventh work twin claiming authorship Aivazovsky. I can show you on the forum page like fabric. They are in the following museums : Omsk Museum of Fine Arts , historical and architectural Velikoustiugskii thin. Museum, Chelyabinsk , TG , One work sold at Christie's auction in 1997. In 2011 , a similar clone was sold at Sotheby's , the only difference in size. So that picture , autograph which you showed the seventh . Concludes .

Добавлено через 4 часа 16 минут
Number 1 - Velikoustiugskii Historical-Architectural and Art Museum-Reserve - " Sheep " ( 162h115 ) 1857 .

Number 2 and 2a - Chelyabinsk Region Picture Gallery - " flock of sheep " or " flock of sheep " ( 107h161 ) 1857 .

Number 3 and 3a - Omsk Museum of Fine Arts - " Sheep " ( 107h161 ) 1858 .

Number 4 - Sotheby's - 2011. " Shepherds with herd at sunset " ( 107,3 ​​x160 , 6) , 1859 .

Number 5 - Christie's auction - 1997 . " Sunset with the shepherds " ( 77h143 8 )

Number 6 and 6a - The State Tretyakov Gallery - " A flock of shepherds " ( 60h89 ) 1860s . (Formerly the web are in private collections S. Gorshina . Moscow)
Number 7 - Flock shepherds . Sunset. ( 90h155 ) oil on canvas 1860s . E.Shaginyana meeting . Yerevan . (Work on whom you ask )

[Glasha]

Сообщение от Nikolai Levenko

№ 1 .. № 2 and 2a .. № 3 and 3a .. № 4 .. № 5 .. № 6 and 6a .. № 7 ...

Brilliant! ..

[progress-arte]

Dear community ! Thank you for such a competent answer . But that's the kind of thing. When I created the topic, I slukavila that sells its antiquarian . The fact that the work , which is now in a hurry to be sold for the price of 1 million 400 dollars ( !) - From the collection of the E. Shahinian . Ie all this years winners of the 7th as much on account of only consoled themselves with the hope ? And what kinds of repeated repetitions Constantinople moonlit night (5) ? How do Nepolitanskogo with views of the bay, which is also on my mind a lot.

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от Nikolai Levenko

Number 7 - Flock shepherds . Sunset. ( 90h155 ) oil on canvas 1860s . E.Shaginyana meeting . Yerevan . (Work on whom you ask )

Excuse me, Nicholas, and where did you get such a high quality reproduction of the number 7 ?

[Николай Левенко]

Сообщение от progress-arte; 3063141"

I'm sorry, Nicholas, and where did you get such a high quality reproduction of the number 7 ?

Working for many years on the creation of the catalog of works by Aivazovsky , I try whenever possible to keep track of everything that is in museums, appears at auction , every move , but not my aim to commit the source.

[progress-arte]

Сообщение от Nikolai Levenko

worked for many years to create a catalog of works by Aivazovsky , I try whenever possible to keep track of everything that is in museums, appears at auction , every move , but not my aim to commit a source of information .

And yet - you immediately , Nicholas realized , despite the appearance of only the signature frame work , what kind of work Aivazovsky question. And despite the fact that , apparently , the work described in the catalog in 1984 , despite the fact that its scenic quality , certainly not worse works sold at auction in 1997 and 1998 , you leave a lot of room for doubt. A signature - that, actually , it 's the catch? Maybe the letter i? Or absence of certain roscherkopodobnosti ? Maybe signature lacks the necessary slope and has no inherent speed of A. ?

[Николай Левенко]

Сообщение от progress-arte; 3063201"

A signature - that, actually , it 's the catch? Maybe the letter i? Or absence of certain roscherkopodobnosti ? Maybe signature lacks the necessary slope and has no inherent speed of A. ?

I do not believe in the authenticity of the signature. Believe me, I went through more than one thousand autographs Aivazovsky, this autograph weak, timid and inept . And that work is marked number 7 , so it's only in my list , I just listed a similar work. Determine the authenticity of the picture is not grateful . On this there are experts who will look and give proper and paper . You have questioned the authenticity , I do not believe it .

[progress-arte]

Сообщение от Nikolai Levenko

Believe me, I went through more than one thousand autographs Aivazovsky, this autograph weak, timid and inept.

Thank you!
I trust your experienced eye.