Funeral Moscow

[Кирилл Сызранский]

in Preobrazhenka. Church no. There is a stuffed church, gutted and spanned by the metal frame. In the end, mankind is able to construct metal frames, and inside some called the five-story building, even live people. Imagine the anti-tank, a thousand times multiplied, spreading in all directions, wedged in wooden logs, so that can not come through. It is these hedgehogs, as on the cross, a crucifix inside Preobrazhenka. All supporting structures destroyed, the floors sawn chainsaw - and in fact in this church much of the sexes played a role beams, clamped tightly between the walls. [/FONT][/URL] [/QUOTE]

[Тютчев]

In blogs wave of indignation because of construction work on Borovitskaya area directly between the home Pashkov and the Kremlin. According to bloggers and media on this site to build a new building for the Moscow Kremlin Museums - depository area of 23 thousand square meters. Building project developed by the architect Vladimir Kolosnitsyn, who previously worked on new buildings Voyentorg and the Arena. All the houses on the site of the present buildings were demolished in 1972, the Soviet visit by U.S. President Richard Nixon. Opponents of development argue that the project, which is implemented now, not been agreed with UNESCO - the organization is considering a zone of the Kremlin as a World Heritage Site. In addition, according to advocates Borovitskaya area, the developer neglects binding archaeological work, highlighting the archaeologists are only three small areas.

September 20 members of the public for some time managed to stop the maintenance work. http://www.lenta.ru/news/2010/09/21/pashkov/

Добавлено через 3 минуты
WARNING, MOSCOW!

Rustam Rahmatullin

At Borovitskaya area is growing construction fence. In the quarter between moss and Manezhnaya streets begins construction depository of Moscow Kremlin Museums. Design on this site has a long history, but the beginning of the work was a complete surprise to the Muscovites.

Green waste ground on Borovitskaya formed after the demolition in 1972. That's when the house first before Pashkov formed so familiar to us esplanade bounded by ragged edges of the surviving homes. With this flaw, of course, had something to do. But what?

July 3, 2006) [/URL]. It was a question of choosing between the three classic and three modernist variants. Classic options, according to the author assumed that if a dialogue, whether the dispute with the House Pashkova in his language: all three were centric, and certificates of a three-part, two of the three - dome. Oppressive feeling of creative destruction was visited by members of Gradsoveta at first glance at the boards, let alone the thought that one of these options could be implemented, it became sickening.

Not by accident the defenders stood on the Heritage Council for the modernist variants, that is, above all for expressing a different artistic language. It is important that the modernist is a curve of the plane, and hence, the architecture can become a hill, not a house on the hill. This idea belongs to the architect Alexander Asadov (among other things, mosproektovtsu), who in 1990 advised to turn the lawn on the hillside in the glass, removing the rest under the ground. I do not know how to react to Muscovites to this approach, but the modernist versions Kolosnitsyna not have to do with him: the building depositary swelled, turning into a hill on the hill. Mayor inevitably chose classical.

On Monday, the defenders of old Moscow, cemented by the victory in Kadashi, lesions in the Estate Alexeyev and another victory in the Estate Volkonskiis, gathered at the gate construction. Behind the gates of a bulldozer without the participation of archaeologists cut the slope of the hill. Information sheet no. Directorate of Museums of the Kremlin in the face of Yuri Sergeyev, deputy construction without waiting for the excesses, invited all to the office.

At first glance approvals included. There is even a harmonization of the National Committee of UNESCO (Borovitskaya area covered by protected zone of the Kremlin). However, the committee agreed on a version without the dome, and the projects to be implemented, the dome - or, rather, gazebo - there. This leads to a simple explanation: the visa of the National Committee dated May 2008, and in July the project again held Gradsovet.

Such a material difference must be metric expression. Indeed, a year ago, supervisory audits allow the height of 22.4 meters and height of the implemented option - 23,8. Which option agreed Rosokhrankultura, Moskomnaslediye and other worthy organizations in 2008 and 2009, remains anyone's guess.

Thus, the agreement obsolete, in other words - the project is not agreed. Demanded once outdoor congregation to find a simple fact.

However, the protest at the Borovitskaya area is not so much legal as architectural and critical nature. Documents are correct, but you can not tweak the selected architectural solution. We say: the basis of the project - the result of the competition in 1997, and this will be true. But this is frankly a weak result. We are, as usual, will say: where were you when the decision was taken. The opposition members and experts Gradsoveta - a protocol. But the majority of Muscovites do not realize that you can penetrate Gradsovet. Order OATI the Works expires October 1. This does not warrant the construction of this order to the preparatory work: the fence, cabins, temporary communications, cutting the lawn. The Moscow Kremlin - too venerable organization to assume the costs of architectural mediocrity and bosses tastelessness.

http://www.izvestia.ru/moscow/article3146385/

[Тютчев]

Borovitskaya square seal

WARNING, MOSCOW!

Rustam Rahmatullin

At Borovitskaya area is growing construction fence. In the quarter between moss and Manezhnaya streets begins construction depository of Moscow Kremlin Museums. Design on this site has a long history, but the beginning of the work was a complete surprise to the Muscovites.

Green waste ground on Borovitskaya formed after the demolition in 1972. Several homes XVIII-XIX centuries have fallen victim to "improvement" of the city for the arrival of President Nixon. That's when the house first before Pashkov formed so familiar to us esplanade bounded by ragged edges of the surviving homes. With this flaw, of course, had something to do. But what?

"Izvestia" analyzed in detail the nature and fate of the draft report of the meeting of the Town Planning Board under the mayor of Moscow (see "Vanguard is not allowed to Borovitskaya area" of the July 3, 2006). It was a question of choosing between the three classic and three modernist variants. All options were drawn Vladimir Kolosnitsyn - inspired by the author remake the "Moscow" and the horror that is called Voyentorg.

Classic options, according to the author assumed that if a dialogue, whether the dispute with the House Pashkova in his language: all three were centric, and certificates of a three-part, two of the three - dome. Find in Moscow, Russia, and the world's artistic force, capable of "conversation" with Pashkov House, almost impossible. And certainly such forces do not have "Mosproject-2. Oppressive feeling of creative destruction was visited by members of Gradsoveta at first glance at the boards, let alone the thought that one of these options could be implemented, it became sickening.

Not by accident the defenders stood on the Heritage Council for the modernist variants, that is, above all for expressing a different artistic language. It is important that the modernist is a curve of the plane, and hence, the architecture can become a hill, not a house on the hill. This idea belongs to the architect Alexander Asadov (among other things, mosproektovtsu), who in 1990 advised to turn the lawn on the hillside in the glass, removing the rest under the ground. I do not know how to react to Muscovites to this approach, but the modernist versions Kolosnitsyna not have to do with him: the building depositary swelled, turning into a hill on the hill. Mayor inevitably chose classical.

On Monday, the defenders of old Moscow, cemented by the victory in Kadashi, lesions in the Estate Alexeyev and another victory in the Estate Volkonskiis, gathered at the gate construction. Behind the gates of a bulldozer without the participation of archaeologists cut the slope of the hill. Information sheet no. Directorate of Museums of the Kremlin in the face of Yuri Sergeyev, deputy construction without waiting for the excesses, invited all to the office.

At first glance approvals included. There is even a harmonization of the National Committee of UNESCO (Borovitskaya area covered by protected zone of the Kremlin). However, the committee agreed on a version without the dome, and the projects to be implemented, the dome - or, rather, gazebo - there. This leads to a simple explanation: the visa of the National Committee dated May 2008, and in July the project again held Gradsovet.

Such a material difference must be metric expression. Indeed, a year ago, supervisory audits allow the height of 22.4 meters and height of the implemented option - 23,8. Which option agreed Rosokhrankultura, Moskomnaslediye and other worthy organizations in 2008 and 2009, remains anyone's guess.

Thus, the agreement obsolete, in other words - the project is not agreed. Demanded once outdoor congregation to find a simple fact.

However, the protest at the Borovitskaya area is not so much legal as architectural and critical nature. Documents are correct, but you can not tweak the selected architectural solution. We say: the basis of the project - the result of the competition in 1997, and this will be true. But this is frankly a weak result. We are, as usual, will say: where were you when the decision was taken. For example, columnist for Izvestia was at his post and feasible object. The opposition members and experts Gradsoveta - a protocol. But the majority of Muscovites do not realize that you can penetrate Gradsovet. Does this mean that "the train has already left?

Order OATI the Works expires October 1. This does not warrant the construction of this order to the preparatory work: the fence, cabins, temporary communications, cutting the lawn. There is a time "measure out for the seventh time." Moscow Kremlin - too venerable organization to assume the costs of architectural mediocrity and bosses tastelessness.

http://www.izvestia.ru/moscow/article3146385/

[Тютчев]

Artists "was set on fire, the Colosseum in Rome

[SergeiSK]

Public Movement "Arhnadzor" proposed to remove from Moscow all the sculptures by Zurab Tsereteli, located at the Manege Square and other "conspicuous places in the city, Interfax reported.
According to the coordinator of motion Konstantin Mikhailov, Zurab Tsereteli, "have nice and interesting work, he's a talented sculptor, but for them, unfortunately, the city has no place." The sculptures, which can be seen in the capital, "spoil the historic appearance of Moscow." Mikhaylov This work proposes to place in any park, "as received after the end of the communist era with Soviet monuments."
In this case, Mikhailov noted that transportation Tsereteli sculptures in a specially reserved place for them is not a priority. "We must, above all, to deal with the perishing historical monuments and remove them from the balance between life and death" - he said.
At the same time gallerist Marat Gelman believes that the new mayor who will replace Yuri Luzhkov, must first rid Moscow of a monument to Peter the Great on Bersenevskaya waterfront. This sculpture of Tsereteli was erected in 1997. Gelman also said that in the Public Chamber of the Russian Federation has established a working group to prepare proposals for improving the appearance of the capital for the future mayor.
(Lenta.Ru)
know Zurab personally, and I respect him, and as an artist and as a person, but nevertheless totally agree with Mikhailov and Gelman - it's too much Tsereteli in Moscow.

[SergeiSK]

Moscow authorities over the next three years do not plan to reconstruct the museum complex on the Crimean shaft, on whose territory the Central House of Artists (CHA) and the new area of the Tretyakov Gallery. On it informs RIA Novosti news agency quoted a source in the city administration.
According to him, the program will implement the General Plan in 2011-2013 involves the reorganization of the six public spaces in the Central District, but the CHA is not among them. In addition, the list of cultural objects, which will be built before 2014, new premises for the CHA and the Tretyakov Gallery is also available.
Information about the possible demolition of the CHA appeared in 2008, when the exhibition in Cannes was a draft of a multifunctional complex "Orange", designed by renowned British architect Norman Foster. Developer of the project was to make the company Inteko Elena Baturina, which declares that it can be implemented in the CHA. Later, holding abandoned the project.
In February 2009, the public hearing was submitted to the project of planning the territory of CHA. According to him, the current premises CHA planned to demolish and construct two new buildings for the Confederation of Unions of Artists and the Tretyakov Gallery. The new building of the Tretyakov Gallery was positioned parallel to the Garden Ring, a building for artists - at right angles. The project also includes commercial construction, the device under the buildings underground parking, as well as the reorganization of the Park Arts Museon.
The project has caused a public outcry and relatives of the architect Nicholas Sukoyan designed by CHA. As a result of the hearing it was decided to change the layout of the quarter. In February 2009, the daughter of an architect Veronika Sukoyan documents filed with the Heritage Committee with a proposal to recognize the CHA architectural monument. Later, this request was rejected.
(Realty.lenta.ru)

[Тютчев]

Restoration Narkomfin "


 Investment Group Copernicus resume the project of scientific restoration of the House of People's Commissariat "

Investment Group "Copernicus" resume the project of the restoration of the House of People's Commissariat "- the famous house-commune 1928-1930 years. building, located on Novinsky Boulevard.

"Narkomfin" - the most important architectural monument of the first half of the twentieth century, was built by one of the ideologists of constructivism M. Ginsburg co-authored with I. Milinis under the auspices of the People's Commissar (Minister) of Finance N. Milutin as a model residential house-commune People's Commissariat for employees. Feature of the building is a unique three-tier plan "apartments-cells, and the fact that much of the accommodation was" socialized "and moved to separate" Shared housing, which have been dining kitchen, gym, laundry room and a solarium. However, the utopian picture of a joint public life has never been incarnated as the building was completed by the time these ideas have lost their popularity.

The fate of the house was not easy - it has never been renovated, and since the 1970's because of the high degree of dilapidation and deterioration building was meant for resettlement and demolition.

In 2006, thanks to the efforts of the public house, a municipality was considered an architectural monument. Renowned architect Alexei Ginzburg (grandson of the author of the draft M. Ginzburg), with the participation of Moskomnasledie drafted scientific restoration and adaptation "House of the People's Commissariat 'a boutique-style hotel in the Soviet avant-garde.

The restoration project involves the demolition of later additions, a return to the original concept of the building and preservation of unique layouts "flat-cells." This proposal was supported by the Moscow Government. As an investor of the project was the company MIAN, which held ransom and resettlement of most of the apartments.

In connection with the financial crisis in 2008 was suspended, abandoned areas came at a critical state, due to open access to the building in the "free" homes had settled the homeless, there were fires and vandalism. During this period, representatives of the international architectural community and the residents are not settled the remaining 12 apartments have repeatedly made demands to the city on the crossing project.

Currently, Investment Group "Copernicus" is ready to resume the project of scientific restoration. Since a significant part of the premises houses the memorial, including "Shared housing is a municipal property, a joint venture with the Moscow government, whose main objectives is the resettlement of the remaining flats (municipal and privatized), and further implementation of the previously announced project to transform the monument into a unique boutique Hotel.

To minimize risks in an empty apartment, work to restore the emergency (fire), wiring and antifungal treatment of the walls. Prior to the restoration of supply of creative unions and organizations of Moscow in a few apartments arranged temporary workshops, residences for young artists.

In parallel, renewed his charitable foundation "People's Commissariat, which aims to research and educational activities in the field of architectural heritage of Russian avant-garde, and studying, compiling and using the experience of scientific restoration of monuments.

[Тютчев]

In Moscow has begun demolition of the plant Bari

In Moscow, began the demolition of buildings mechanical plant family Bari. About this reported in LiveJournal-Community movement Arhnadzor.
Demolition work began at the Lenin Sloboda, Building 19. There are three buildings - the fifth (former factory administration building), first (barracks) and the first, building 1 (stable). According to "Arhnadzor, these structures represent the" undoubted architectural and commemorative value "and" play a significant role in shaping the architectural and historical image of Lenin settlement. " All the buildings were built between 1895 and 1907.

Demolition work began on the morning of Monday, November 15. Representatives "Arhnadzor" failed to find out exactly what the organization and for what purpose is working. In this case, according to the movement of builders do not allow the documents for demolition.

"Arhnadzor" also notes that all three buildings was not listed in the register of cultural heritage and, therefore, not treated as objects, which need state protection. Representatives of the movement sent a letter to the Heritage Committee with a request to perform an examination and its results to the building in the registry.

http://www.lenta.ru/news/2010/11/15/snos/

[Игорь Гурьев]

Tob. Syzran.

Latynina, sometimes as a breccia which, as head spin for a long time to depart from the kooky dear Julia.

Particularly liked about the difference of axes 20 th century and 17 th.

At the same time reminded of Tintoretto painting "Golgotha" (16 th century, from San Rocco), which depicts a set of joinery and carpentry tools identical to the 20 th century.

I certainly do not expect that Comrade. Latynina once waved a hatchet, but as I understand it, literate editors in Russia no longer exists?

[Grigory]

Сообщение от "Guriev, Igor

I understand, literate editors in Russia no longer exists?

There was one, and he went to the city AP

And yet he was the sole moderator for Russia ...