Сообщение от iside
Tribal Art, Thank you for rating. I think you're the only one on the forum who uveren in inventory. And in a PM Pictures are not fixed, plus many here (not me) are allergic to the Latin alphabet, so if someone appears, it will be here to write, take care of the nerves <! - ~ 1 ~ ->
The name you did not say it was a fragment, like full watch, please confirm in PM, I figured out how to send, here it is better not to write, and then the fellow Tribal Art angry, basically, I had I understand. <! - 6 ~ ~ ->
Thanks, I thought for a moment that it was Miriam Aslamazyan, she loved to write "ethnographic" still lives, but if the name does not tell me anything, it will not bring you the hassle.
I am Mr. Tribal Art, in principle, do not really understand, because:
A. such a zealous attitude to the subject matter does not imply a dialogue, in which case, why is the forum?
Two. in the case of folk, ethnographic art, in this case Africa, the concept of "fake" needs to be explained.
It's one thing if these works create, say, the Armenians at the French factory, shop, then of course - fake. But if you do it media
on the culture of ancient technology, then we can say that it is not
antiques, but not fake. In exactly the same as today craftswomen weave carpets by hand on the same machine that their grandmother and on the same samples. Generally, in a fake folk art - the concept is ambiguous.