Beware, fake pictures!

[khmelev]

the number of claims in the quality pehodit

http://www.russianartandculture.com/...geries-debate/

[Vladimir]

Judging by the photos, things are absolutely helpless.
Well this is what is necessary to carry out the preparatory work to ohmurit Kozlevich?


http://artinvestment.ru/news/artnews...t_forgery.html

[artcol]

Сообщение от Vladimir

Judging from the photos

Yes, this offer Malevich.
Yellow coloring.

[Pavel]

Сообщение от Konstantin

There are also other ways to determine the authenticity of the works, such as the study of the origins, including a history of buying and selling, although it is not always possible, Grubel said.

To add or improve.

[Vladimir]

Yellow?
We must take it!
<! - ~ 1 ~ ->

[artcol]

Сообщение от Vladimir

Yellow?
We must take it!
<! - ~ 1 ~ ->

Yes, zholtago.
And abstract risunochek on it applied over zholtago background - squares, lines, rectangles.
It is seen that thing previously used, but the new, let's say, a thing, but such a good quality, good manifaktury not Smolensk.

[Николай Левенко]

Auction ebay does not cease to amaze. The work presented at today's auction, no relation to I.Ayvazovsky not. Neither technically nor coloristic not correspond works seascape, date and signature of the rough and made a painting of the nineteenth century to pull hard. However, expert opinion suggests otherwise. The expert refers to "the analysis using a magnifying glass and UV." All shows and a cursory glance that no chemical analysis or research in ultraviolet light, in this case, are not needed. How's work and conclusion worthless fake. Conclusion does not have special caps, typed on a computer without printing, with one, no one certified autograph. Such findings may provide anyone, even far from the art of man. To assume that this conclusion can not be made for the money, to pay for this because no one will be lime. It is assumed that one man imagined that he approached a talent to Aivazovsky, and other fancies himself an expert in the art style seascape.
There are borderline works where authorship is difficult to visually identify and connect to all possible expertise, but that is not the case. The availability of such expert opinion does not increase the cost of fabric, as well as confidence in the authenticity of the painting.

[artcol]

[QUOTE=Nicholas Levenko; 2645261] Auction ebay does not cease to amaze. The work presented at today's auction, no relation to I.Ayvazovsky not. Neither technically nor coloristic not correspond works seascape, date and signature of the rough and made a painting of the nineteenth century to pull hard. However, expert opinion suggests otherwise. The expert refers to "the analysis using a magnifying glass and UV." All shows and a cursory glance that no chemical analysis or research in ultraviolet light, in this case, are not needed. How's work and conclusion worthless fake. Conclusion does not have special caps, typed on a computer without printing, with one, no one certified autograph. Such findings may provide anyone, even far from the art of man. To assume that this conclusion can not be made for the money, to pay for this because no one will be lime. It is assumed that one man imagined that he approached a talent to Aivazovsky, and other fancies himself an expert in the art style seascape.
There are borderline works where authorship is difficult to visually identify and connect to all possible expertise, but that is not the case. The availability of such expert opinion does not increase the cost of fabric, as well as confidence in the authenticity of the painting.

Nicholas, and that's given you a fragment of a night light - it's about what you said?

[Николай Левенко]

Сообщение от artcol; 2645271 "

Nicholas, but given you a fragment of a night light - it 's about what you said ?

This piece is a nighttime lights not me, and the afore-mentioned auction. I just duplicated their image . But as for the track , I will say : It is known that Aivazovsky always wrote the sky at once , giving the sky in his paintings of lightness and transparency , and refinement in the clouds colorful dough. It is in the heaven and in the long-range plans , he rubbed paint a thin layer of barely noticeable , but not so on the illustrated fragment. Just at that point can be clearly seen that the work is varnished , which is 1887 for paintings by Aivazovsky completely ruled out. (Although varnish could inflict much later )

[AlexFEO]

Signature explicitly left, especially the letters a and s are different, + digits totally different output.