Вернуться   Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство > English forum > Insurance

Insurance Everything related to insurance — in what cases you need to insure artworks, where and how you can insure them, prices, terms and conditions of insurance.

Ответ
 
Опции темы Опции просмотра
Старый 06.04.2013, 17:37 Язык оригинала: Русский       #21
Гуру
 
Аватар для LCR
 
Регистрация: 29.04.2008
Адрес: Париж
Сообщений: 6,211
Спасибо: 18,677
Поблагодарили 38,258 раз(а) в 5,446 сообщениях
Репутация: 29878
По умолчанию

I would like to clarify one thing : the person who buys a piece of art , can not in principle or advance it, or publish it, if he has not received from the author /assignee of the rights concerned. I think that is unfair.
Until relatively recently, this is really no one thought , but now the question has become urgent. I think it is logical to provide the buyer with such rights. However, transfer them to a non-exclusive , to be able to put yourself (in practice this is not always possible) and publish (perhaps always , if you have photo /slide work).

Personally, I give these rights to all honest owners work Roginsky , I included this item in the certificates of authenticity. I also think that a person who buys a painting can not be asked to pay any extra money for the right to show it >
Another thing, when it comes to the assignment of these rights, and even a non-exclusive , for commercial purposes, well, for example , to play this work on T-shirts >



LCR вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 15 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо LCR за это полезное сообщение:
Daniil_Belov (05.01.2014), DSF (07.04.2013), fabosch (06.04.2013), Flora (07.04.2013), Grigory (08.04.2013), iosif (06.04.2013), Jasmin (06.04.2013), kozhinart (12.04.2013), NATA NOVA (06.04.2013), Pavel (07.04.2013), spigo (06.04.2013), zarajara (07.04.2013), Кирилл Сызранский (06.04.2013), Маруся (06.04.2013), Самвел (16.04.2013)
Старый 06.04.2013, 18:52 Язык оригинала: Русский       #22
Гуру
 
Регистрация: 24.05.2009
Сообщений: 1,972
Спасибо: 4,937
Поблагодарили 4,308 раз(а) в 1,547 сообщениях
Репутация: 8082
По умолчанию

Dear LCR, very cool that you are again on the forum! And the Civil Code and heed your wishes granted conscientious owners of works of art is quite a specific law:
If the exclusive right to work has not been transferred to the buyer along with the original product , the purchaser , without the author's consent and without payment of compensation to him , may:
- To demonstrate the acquisition of ownership original works
- Transmit the original of the work to be exhibited at the exhibitions organized by other entities and
- Play it in exhibition catalogs and publications devoted to his collection (Art. 1291)
There is further independent transition of the exclusive right to the owner



Маруся вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 8 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо Маруся за это полезное сообщение:
DSF (07.04.2013), fabosch (06.04.2013), iosif (06.04.2013), LCR (08.04.2013), NATA NOVA (06.04.2013), Pavel (07.04.2013), spigo (06.04.2013), zarajara (07.04.2013)
Старый 06.04.2013, 19:24 Язык оригинала: Русский       #23
Гуру
 
Аватар для NATA NOVA
 
Регистрация: 23.07.2009
Сообщений: 5,736
Спасибо: 8,058
Поблагодарили 4,382 раз(а) в 2,259 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 2
Репутация: 8507
Отправить сообщение для NATA NOVA с помощью Skype™
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Marusya, 2541941
Dear LCR, very cool that you are back online!
I also heartily glad!

Without You forum was to wither, emasculated, and eventually turns into ..
(No words), IMHO.



NATA NOVA вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Старый 06.04.2013, 23:58 Язык оригинала: Русский       #24
Гуру
 
Аватар для K-Maler
 
Регистрация: 02.02.2009
Сообщений: 4,553
Спасибо: 9,498
Поблагодарили 3,648 раз(а) в 1,666 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 4
Репутация: 6457
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Irina, 2538581"
p.3 Resale inalienable, but passes to the heirs of the author at the term of the exclusive rights to the work. "
I do not understand this language, if passed by \\\\ sold the exclusive rights to another person.
This means that the right of succession can not be transferred under the agreement, but passes to the heirs of a certain statutory period.
Resale can be applied (in the countries that use it) is only if the resale price exceeded the previous one by at least 20%.

Added after 16 minutes
Цитата:
Сообщение от fabosch; 2539291"
I do not know the law prohibiting destroy belongs to you personally and to any right of private property. E
Works protected by copyright law, a special property - it's cultural values ​​and to such property subject to special laws.

Moral rights (which can not be transferred) contains "the right to the protection of the product, including its name, from any distortion or other derogatory act liable to prejudice the honor and dignity (right to protection of reputation of the author.)

Added after 30 minutes
Цитата:
Сообщение от Irina, 2538581"
Do I understand correctly that if the owner has not got a picture with it, the author is also the exclusive rights to it, then he has no right to resell it in the future without the consent of the author.
No, wrong. He can sell, but here, for example, make posters without an agreement with you can not. You must specify this in the contract, with your fee as a percentage, and for how long and in what country sales, etc.
Then the question arises of the exclusive right, ie Do you allow all this only to him or if you have the intention and the most print posters or sell that right to someone else and get more interest from other parties, printing posters.
__________________
"Будьте внимательны, сильные личности. Мне кажется, что в настоящее время нет ничего дороже и реже встречающегося, чем честность" (Ф.Ницше "Так говорил Заратустра".)




Последний раз редактировалось K-Maler; 08.04.2013 в 22:11. Причина: Добавлено сообщение
K-Maler вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо K-Maler за это полезное сообщение:
Pavel (07.04.2013)
Старый 07.04.2013, 08:26 Язык оригинала: Русский       #25
Гуру
 
Аватар для Pavel
 
Регистрация: 13.02.2009
Сообщений: 7,384
Спасибо: 3,976
Поблагодарили 4,028 раз(а) в 1,687 сообщениях
Репутация: -2
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от K-Maler; 2542311 "
No , wrong. He can sell , but here, for example , make posters without an agreement with you can not. You must specify this in the contract , with your fee as a percentage, and for how long and in what country prdazhi etc.
Then the question arises of the exclusive right , ie Do you allow all this only to him or if you have the intention and the most print posters or sell that right to someone else and get more interest from other authors.
Why not . If paid enough, then let it be eaten . Drusoe matter if a lot of paid and dignified, even posters and so on and participate in exhibitions, etc. becomes profitable , or the artist 's heirs , because it is a direct advertising, and if the artist is known and it is more expensive.
Why all the fuss about rights is not correct.

LSR- Hi and fellowship!



Pavel вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо Pavel за это полезное сообщение:
Старый 11.04.2013, 20:08 Язык оригинала: Русский       #26
Пользователь
 
Регистрация: 12.02.2011
Сообщений: 81
Спасибо: 13
Поблагодарили 109 раз(а) в 49 сообщениях
Репутация: 218
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от K-Maler; 2542311"
Quote:
Posted by Irina View Post
Do I understand correctly that if the owner has not got a picture with it, the author is also the exclusive rights to it, then he has no right to resell it in the future without the consent of the author.
No, wrong. Sell ​​it can
On what basis do you make such statements?
Read Chapter 70. Copyright
Article 1270. Exclusive right to work. It clearly stated that the right to distribute the work by sale has only the author or
 a holder of exclusive rights to it.
And further down in Article 1291 read: "If the exclusive right to work has not been transferred to the purchaser of its original, the purchaser may, without the consent of the author and without payment of compensation to him to show the original acquisition of ownership of the work and reproduce it in exhibition catalogs and publications, devoted to his collection, and send the original of the works to be exhibited at the exhibitions organized by other entities. " ONLY
The question is relevant in so far as there is more:
"Article 1301. Liability for infringement of the exclusive right in the work
 In cases of violation of the exclusive rights in a work the author or other copyright holder ... right ... to demand of their choice instead of the offender for damages compensation:
in the amount of ten thousand to five million rubles determined at the discretion of the court;
to double the value of copies of the work or the equivalent to twice the value of the right to use the work, determined on the basis of price, which in comparable circumstances is usually charged for the lawful use of the work. "

And if the six-digit numbers, then pause.



Ирина Ивановна вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Старый 12.04.2013, 00:08 Язык оригинала: Русский       #27
Гуру
 
Регистрация: 24.05.2009
Сообщений: 1,972
Спасибо: 4,937
Поблагодарили 4,308 раз(а) в 1,547 сообщениях
Репутация: 8082
По умолчанию

I'll try again in other words ...
First, the author's rights and the rights of the owner of the product - not the same thing and no unrelated.
Copyright in the work - it is the cumulative one that consists of individual rights that may exist together or separately, have different expiration dates and different modes of transport and protection
There are rights that are nowhere on the author can not escape, that is, they can not sell or donate or bequeath (eg, copyright)
There are rights that can only go by inheritance (eg the right of succession)
There are rights that can not be bought, but you can limit, ie treaty to ban the author to exercise these rights (eg right of access)
Among the above rights is the exclusive right of which can and sell it, and give and bequeath, and you can completely (once), can be partially (many times) reduces the right to the lawful play a specific product so when give and bequeath - take it, and if it comes to purchasing exclusive rights - in the first place is to think about the feasibility of additional costs.

The rights of legitimate owners of the works, whether together or separately from the exclusive right, he owns the original - it is to buy and sell at will, and who want, to show at trade shows or hide from view in its sole discretion, to publish as part of its collection (t . partial right is playing). Quite a self-contained set of rights that can be used, without anyone in the known and violation of the exclusive rights is by no means a (C violations include other actions)



Маруся вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо Маруся за это полезное сообщение:
fabosch (12.04.2013)
Старый 14.04.2013, 23:11 Язык оригинала: Русский       #28
Старожил
 
Аватар для kozhinart
 
Регистрация: 20.09.2008
Адрес: Moscow,Russia
Сообщений: 694
Спасибо: 1,324
Поблагодарили 1,086 раз(а) в 255 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 15
Репутация: 2082
Отправить сообщение для kozhinart с помощью ICQ Отправить сообщение для kozhinart с помощью Yahoo Отправить сообщение для kozhinart с помощью Skype™
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от fabosch Посмотреть сообщение
I do not know the law prohibiting destroy belongs to you personally and to any right of private property. If you do this in public, there may be some nuances related to public morals or anything else, really is lazy to think that there might still get out.
There is an article in the Criminal Code:
Article 243. Destruction or damage of monuments of history and culture
[Criminal Code][Chapter 25] [Article 243]

1. Destruction or damage of monuments of history, culture, natural complexes and objects protected by the state, as well as objects and documents of historical or cultural value -

shall be punished by a fine of up to two hundred thousand rubles or the salary or other income for a period of eighteen months, or by compulsory works for a term of up to three hundred and sixty hours, or hard labor for a term not exceeding two years, or imprisonment for the same term.

2. The same acts committed against the most valuable objects or monuments of national importance -

punishable by a fine of one hundred thousand to five hundred thousand rubles or the salary or other income for a period of one to three years, or by compulsory works for a term of up to four hours, or hard labor for a term not exceeding five years, or imprisonment liberty for the same term.
__________________
У всякого из нас имеются иллюзии, которые он не хотел бы разрушать.Али Апшерони



kozhinart вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо kozhinart за это полезное сообщение:
fabosch (16.04.2013)
Старый 14.04.2013, 23:32 Язык оригинала: Русский       #29
Гуру
 
Регистрация: 24.05.2009
Сообщений: 1,972
Спасибо: 4,937
Поблагодарили 4,308 раз(а) в 1,547 сообщениях
Репутация: 8082
По умолчанию

Unfortunately, until the adoption of the laws on antiques and cultural values ​​all that is in the house of a citizen and belongs to him legally, will be considered personal property, regardless of value and historical value, and accordingly ...
fabosch right!



Маруся вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо Маруся за это полезное сообщение:
DSF (14.04.2013)
Старый 16.04.2013, 17:30 Язык оригинала: Русский       #30
Гуру
 
Аватар для fabosch
 
Регистрация: 06.04.2010
Адрес: Санкт-Петербург
Сообщений: 1,283
Спасибо: 3,923
Поблагодарили 4,953 раз(а) в 992 сообщениях
Репутация: 9945
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от kozhinart Посмотреть сообщение
There is a clause in the Criminal Code:
Article 243. Destruction or damage of monuments of history and culture
[Criminal Code][Chapter 25] [Article 243]

1. Destruction or damage of monuments of history, culture, natural complexes and objects protected by the state, as well as objects and documents of historical or cultural value -

shall be punished by a fine of up to two hundred thousand rubles or the salary or other income for a period of eighteen months, or by compulsory works for a term of up to three hundred and sixty hours, or hard labor for a term not exceeding two years, or imprisonment for the same term.

2. The same acts committed against the most valuable objects or monuments of national importance -

punishable by a fine of one hundred thousand to five hundred thousand rubles or the salary or other income for a period of one to three years, or by compulsory works for a term of up to four hours, or hard labor for a term not exceeding five years, or imprisonment freedom for the same period.
kozhinart, everything seems to be correct, but here is a simple question. What is known whether a single specific example of conviction on this article for the destruction of works of art? I'm talking about works that belong to someone on the right of private property? It seems that it was something about it, and not a work of art in general.



fabosch вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 3 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо fabosch за это полезное сообщение:
K-Maler (16.04.2013), kozhinart (16.04.2013), Маруся (16.04.2013)
Ответ

Опции темы
Опции просмотра

Ваши права в разделе
Вы не можете создавать новые темы
Вы не можете отвечать в темах
Вы не можете прикреплять вложения
Вы не можете редактировать свои сообщения

BB коды Вкл.
Смайлы Вкл.
[IMG] код Вкл.
HTML код Выкл.

Быстрый переход

Похожие темы
Тема Автор Разделы Ответов Последние сообщения
What is this work? BAGIRA Costs, valuation, attribution 2 25.12.2012 19:42
How to take out their work? Марина13 Import / Export 3 07.04.2011 13:09
Whose work? Артём Costs, valuation, attribution 18 09.09.2010 18:41
Exclusive! Stella Kesaeva opens a museum! LCR Exhibitions and events 39 20.11.2008 01:20





Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 20:58.
Telegram - Обратная связь - Обработка персональных данных - Архив - Вверх


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Перевод: zCarot