This is not Stozharau!

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

And now it seems to me that this Stozharau.

Here is the answer, thank you.

Сообщение от "Guriev, Igor

Do not think that I would like you to somehow convince.

And you and me can not "somewhat" to persuade, ie b. As I now saw, with respect to questions about Stozharove.

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Where else have you Stozharova such a "stupid unpainted Vida?

"Stupid unpainted" ...

[sergejnowo]

Сообщение от SergeiSK

at all questionable work, although very, very similar to the present Stozharova.
Do not be surprised if soon they will appear on the art market, but with the examinations.

as the water looked >

[Кирилл Сызранский]

sergejnowo, but these horses at Magnum Arce exhibited without examination .
Note , incidentally , on lots without expertise on the auction : 77 lots of Russian and Soviet art , and 25 of them without examination .
Although expertise to make this antiquarian and artistic association with the seat at Lavroushinsky Lane , 11 , Bldg . 1 were not working would be (for comparison : address NINE them . Pavel Tretyakov Big Tolmachevsky Lane , Building 16 , behind the wall ") .

[sergejnowo]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

, but these horses at Magnum Arce without examination exposed

And why?

For professional expertise is not necessary, and an eye on what?
>

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от sergejnowo

For professional expertise is not necessary, and an eye on what?
>

Yes, indeed ...
>

But sometimes it is difficult to understand and professionals:

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

This may be Stozharau, and may not be Stozharau (which is unlikely).

 
>

Added after 27 minutes
Generally, curiously read the topic from Post № 51.
Here are some comments of participants regarding authorship of the 3 studies in Yerevan:

Сообщение от artcol; 1428431"

can someone with a picture of a sketch. It would be difficult without Dedyuli. It seems to me rather Stozharau was punctuated once. Although e mb a photo like that.

Сообщение от SergeiSK

There is no certainty that it Stozharau not.

Сообщение от Glasha

In my opinion, all three - not stozharovskie. The last two - a very great deal of confidence.
In the first, yes, in the center of a piece of a similar but izbushechka in the background - no etude and not stozharovskaya.

Сообщение от sergejnowo

Speaking only for their first job, the other two did not specifically Stozharau.

Сообщение от Tana; 1429871"

and that the sketches are so small, too, the lottery razigryvalis? I think that neither of these works is not working Stozharova, well, not his hand!
While written response, noted that Glasha also drew attention to izbushechku, here, and I did not like it, do not stozharovskaya it!! Still difficult obsnit why, but I do not believe that this Stozharau.

Сообщение от Artem; 1455961"

Who else but not Stozharau. Not his hand. Not its composition, which has always distinguished by the depth and the ability to choose the most important thing. Not its contrast, which is always present in the works Stozharova apparently superimposed his character quite hard to see light and shadow. And conciseness in color, always present in Stozharova. And of course his meaty swab, put an almost mathematical way, in these papers is missing.

On this topic on Dec. 30, and so ended.
But!
Six months later came post that one of these sketches for sale at Magnum Arce (auction on June 21, Lot 69).

And then it began! >
There are messages which the author tries to prove the authenticity of the scene, and then the authenticity and the other two.
The question arises: but why?
For the love of truth? > Or, for personal gain? >

[Glasha]

Сообщение от Guriev , Igor ; 1667123 "

And if this was certainly a fake, there would be no unpainted CANVAS OVER Griva.

For me this moment - a decisive .

Igor Sasha, dear , this is not an argument . Counterfeiters ( koi have a high level , unfortunately ) , making the sketch , understand its characteristics .
And also do not see any logic in your next sentence .

Tiutchev, thanks for the work done, Alexander would have been happy .

I hope we all understand the difference between the sketches and painting , between early and mature periods of the artist .
But still , looking at these horses , still can not agree ( I will not voice - why) .

In this case, I would love to be wrong , just that these are generally nasty , regardless of their level , counterfeit was smaller.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Вячеслав Калинин, Бумага, акварель, 60 х 44 см (без рамки), y.1987.


Другие фотографии и информация: international.artinvestment @ co.inet.fi

[Маруся]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

At Magnum Arce , this " little sketch " put up with the estimate 14 000 - 18 000 $.

Gentlemen !
I am sure that Alexander would be grateful for its art history work . I think that is to inform his son and grandson B. Stozharova . Firstly , it has AV file that he was very meticulous when preparing the site Stozharova , and secondly , if the job ( even incorrect ) will be sold , he , by law , is entitled to a share of the author .
So, if someone talks with him , let him know , he certainly interested and we can get reliable information ... Maybe ...

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky ; 1667391 "

At the December 30 issue of the current year and over.
But !
Six months later it was reported that one of these sketches for sale at Magnum Arce ( auction on June 21 , Lot 69) .

And then it began !
There are messages which the author tries to prove the authenticity of the scene, and then the authenticity and the other two .
The question arises : why ?

No other - a conspiracy .
A Comrade . Guriev - coordinator of this insidious plot .