Photography as an object of investment

[BAGIRA]

Good! Photograph or picture. And that we have. How about this series - "Life for Sale"? And also my opinion: No matter what means you are using. It is important that you want to say to get a result. I mean technological methods. Ways to many, as in painting, for example. Only by using a feature of an individual, as well as looking at things, the object of creativity.

[KaterinaMN]

Сообщение от BAGIRA

No matter what means you are using. It is important that you want to say to get a result. I mean technological methods. Ways to many, as in painting, for example. Only by using a feature of an individual, as well as looking at things, the object of creativity.

vot.vot.vot.
I do the same.
should not be confused technology and plot. technology and object creation.

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

Сообщение от KaterinaMN

Yes, of course macro imprisoned under. but this does not prevent its use. would desire.
.....
for figures using Canon

for ... under ...

You can hammer nails and a camera ... but somehow uncomfortable.
How to do without technology? Even I, not being the photographer, can no longer rent equipment below a certain class. It's disgusting.

If there is no secret that you have a Canon? What camera, what lenses?

Added after 2 minutes

Сообщение от BAGIRA

Good! Photograph or picture. And that we have. ...

My opinion - very amateur shots. As for the composition and technical quality. One can see the standard errors of novice photographers. But if you like to shoot something that you do not do anyone harm. Shoot! All we have to start somewhere. I myself, by the way, do not think the photographer. Thus, advanced amateur, who himself is not too good films, but in the longer able to distinguish between an amateur shot from a good shot.

The same thing I think to myself in painting: "The Chukchi not the reader, Chukchi - a writer." Paint did not know how, but I love collecting painted.


If there is no secret that using?

Shl

Here's an example, two frames are made at one time, in the same place by different people and different techniques. The difference you see? Shots I picked up so that they were similar to your series.

[KaterinaMN]

Сообщение от Chernomashentsev Vladimir

Even in pictures you can see the clear separation of areas, which make different cameras and different lenses:

1) the shooting
2) Portrait
3) Macro
4) Nu
5) Landscape
....

did not want to, but still started up.
specifically to pull images made by a camera with a non-replaceable lens, respectively fix.
Do not follow dogmatically postulate that for each genre should have its own camera and lens. this convention. it is not 100%.

----
for quality scans apologize. not always a good scan.

[KaterinaMN]

Сообщение от Chernomashentsev Vladimir

Even I, not being a photographer, I can not get to rent equipment below a certain class. It's disgusting.

If there is no secret that you have a Canon? What camera, what lenses?

Well now here I'll start to get angry, and nothing good will from that.
"I can not rent equipment below a certain class - and to what class would you assign to my favorite bezobektivny pinhole??? is simply a wooden box. all. my Yashica - 50 years. and the other kamerke - generally more than a hundred.

Canon I shoot, if you shoot, four, lenses - 28, and fifty dollars. and universal 17-85.
but if you ask me what I'm shooting more - I will answer that Yashica and pinhole. glass and I like to do much more than the rent on the figure. but even there - the camera formatted restored sobektivom end of 19 century.

[BAGIRA]

Rent DSC-F828. Camera I like. Photography since childhood. Since that time, when with developers and fixative were locked in the bathroom, the anger of all households. Worked on "Slideshow", there was a school photographer. Nowhere have I called myself a pro. But I consider myself a photographer. I'm doing it as I see and how I like it. I ask my opinion is right. It's a pity that you did not like. That's it. Yours.

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

Сообщение от KaterinaMN

do not want to, but still started up.
....

Do not start. It's not worth it. I'm too wound up - that you did not have on this topic, then suddenly pounced on my post. And write a bit not that from my point of view.

Some things are obvious. In the city you will be very difficult to work with telephoto lens if you shoot architecture. So?
But the "fish-Ise" will not work because of the incredible distortions. So?
Every artist has a different tool for different cases. Or is he not the master?

Of course, no technology can not teach fotografirovta. Master and with disposable soap dish can make masterpieces in contrast to the rich tourists, who bought himself out of stupidity most expensive and heavy machinery. But I have not seen a decent assortment of artists without any accessories, although they buy pocket camera, as is not always possible to carry a few kilos of equipment.

[BAGIRA]

By the way, every pro knows that the old technology is the thing, it really works!!

[Черномашенцев Владимир]

Сообщение от KaterinaMN

"I can not rent equipment below a certain class - and to what class would you assign to my favorite bezobektivny pinhole??? is simply a wooden box. all. my Yashica - 50 years. and the other kamerke - generally more than a hundred.

Canon I shoot, if you shoot, four, lenses - 28, and fifty dollars. and universal 17-85.
but if you ask me what I'm shooting more - I will answer that Yashica and pinhole. glass and I like to do much more than the rent on the figure. but even there - the camera formatted restored sobektivom end of 19 century.

I think that history is more important for you to photograph. You are pleased to work with antiques. Do you think that the modern Hasselblad, Mamiya, Leica will shoot any worse?
Alas, technology develops. You can compare cars beginning in 1920 and the beginning of 21 century. Looks beautiful antiques, but the ride uncomfortable. So in optics - have since appeared aspherical lenses, nizkodispersionnoe glass mnogolinzovye lenses. All the things that were a hundred years ago, and 50.
But you have every right to do, if you so much.
The meaning of my question was to understand the meaning of further conversation. I realized that we would speak in terms of different, so I think further discussion pointless. Sorry if what hurt.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

KaterinaMN, in a theme:

The picture shows two cameras, which still takes Katya Shtukin for his newspaper "Izvestia (owner of publishing - the insurance company" SOGAZ "). This Canon has long worn out - physically and technologically, and the models themselves removed from production many years ago. As Kate manages to shoot them (and excellent shooting, mind you), is known only to her.

I think that the new camera for Katie is monthly salary of a manager in a medium-sized companies SOGAZ, not more. Why is no one in the office of the Izvestia newspaper or from the owners do not pay attention to what techniques are working their press photographers, members of the so-called "Kremlin pool"? These press photographers travel the world next to the Russian president and remove this fotoruhlyadyu on which the Western media correspondents, working with our side by side, watching with polite bewilderment, while others, for sure, and with contempt.

Hosts ĞSogazğ, the editors of Izvestia, are not you ashamed? Follow the example of the owners of Kommersant. Sasha Miridonova, which is included in the pool, all the cameras are always "a brand": it is already two months removes Canon 1D Mark IV.

http://drugoi.livejournal.com/3234328.html

Добавлено через 2 минуты
KaterinaMN, would you explain to someone that doing art photography, but do not remove the memory of the tour in Thailand.