What do you think Sychkov?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

[/QUOTE]
I noticed that you have a memory not strong:
And me this la-la is not interesting, I'm a simple man, a practical-city, museum, technology, size, year, preferably.
Igor Guriev, you got into a dispute on the copies, you me and provide as its argument.

Added after 2 minutes
Where the original? The third time you ask this question.

[Игорь Гурьев]

The third time you ask this question. [/QUOTE]
Irkutsk hudozhestvvenny museum.

Добавлено через 2 минуты
And now, comrade. Syzran, I would like to show you a copy by Ditte, ticking of the storm of Poltavskago painter museum (sorry for the quality of shooting):

[Игорь Гурьев]

And now, comrade.
Syzran, I would like to show you a copy by "Ditey, ticking vid Menace" from Poltavskago painter museum (sorry for the quality of shooting):


I turned the system is not idiotic.
To rotate the need to use any third party programs.
Gregory

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Repeat:
[/QUOTE]

Добавлено через 5 минут
That there (№ 1) and the State Tretyakov Gallery (№ 2):

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor

Irkutsk hudozhestvvenny Museum.

That there (№ 1) and the State Tretyakov Gallery (№ 2):

[Игорь Гурьев]

Syzran also heard nothing?

Added after 1 minutes
So what?
What are the differences in reproduction?

Especially when you consider that the existence of the original, you just learned today?

I had already compared, yet I worked in the museum of the artist Plastov, you are wrong then I try to explain something.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Syzran also heard nothing? [/QUOTE]

Igor Guriev, I will not you answer the questions.

[Игорь Гурьев]

You see, I can not let you uchitzdes and now an elementary art criticism literacy.
Copyright repeated - and have a copy.
But - the final version.
I have long and well and firmly know the history of Russian painting.
But the main thing - he studied it systematically.
Do you understand? Sis-te-ma-ti-cally.
And there's something familiar with.
I gave you one example, then the other, on both of you have stumbled.
I'm not sure what to give a third.
Not in horse feed, as gritstsa.
You want to prove something, but I just want to share my thoughts.
I do not like to argue - and when I was something to prove.
We are not in Soviet-type nut house, I hope, to do something to prove.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

I chesno confess, I thought that the original just in the Tretyakov Gallery.

Added after 4 minutes

You promised me a hundred, and resulted in only one example-Plastov.
Everything.


Okay, Igor Guriev, zamnem yet ... for clarity ... 1 ~ <!--~ -> with strong knowledge.

Added after 9 minutes
I do not like to argue - and when I was something to prove. [/QUOTE]
implementation, as it is written on the auction site, one year after the original.

[Игорь Гурьев]

All. [/QUOTE]
Yes, I think you should stop.
About Makovsky and Pryanishnikova you chose not to notice.
Believe me, there are many other things that you (and many on this forum) do not even suspect, as I know.
Well, I read here the Enlightenment lecture those who bothered to learn basic facts?
On the nose by the way.[/B]
What about you, arrange at least 101 examples?

========
Summing.
This can be Sychkov.
But to say this with confidence, you see the original, not the photo.
That's all.