Yu.P.Annenkov, "Portrait of D.Yu.Gessena"

[maket]

Kamensky deposit receipt issued by 100 thousand dollars, and part of the letter I quoted Guerra.
Note, not told, but it is quoted.

If you are too lazy to read all the correspondence - can be repeated.
And please, no anger and unfounded accusations.

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от maket

Kamensky deposit receipt issued by 100 thousand dollars, and part of the letter I quoted Guerra . Note, not told , but it is quoted .
If you are too lazy to read all the correspondence - can be repeated. And please , no malice , and unsubstantiated accusations .

The receipt ( at least for mulen !) And examination under which the expert has put his signature is not the same thing. Agree ? Receipt - a guarantee of an object ( notional value which you have agreed among themselves) and only. It's not even score. This paper , which can be discarded after the return of the picture. By the way , and you destroyed it , this signature ? Or maintained to have been handy to hang noodles ? <! - 6 ~ ~ ->

[maket]

That is , I do not want to get involved :

Trolling (from the English . Trolling - « fishing lure ") - the form of virtual communication in violation of the ethics of networking , which is expressed in the form of various forms of aggressive , humiliating and abusive behavior . Used as a personalized parties that are interested in more visibility, publicity , or outrageous , and in the process of anonymous users to interact, carried out without the possibility of identification with the real subject of virtual communication

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от maket

If you are too lazy to read all the correspondence - can be repeated. And please , no malice , and unsubstantiated accusations .

There is no need to repeat . I carefully read everything . In short, everything that you wrote this " water". The usual reference to the legend of famous people and facts that are essentially nothing about the authenticity of the proposed works.

I probably would have been more careful in his wording, but you wrote so much that I have no doubt that you intentionally vparivayut FORGERY .

Can a bet . Right here . At some serious money. Are you ready? What amount, if you're so sure that is the work of Yuri Annenkov and your money . Go ahead ! ..

[maket]

Documents confirming that the product is from the family archive.

[Тютчев]

Сообщение от maket

Proof that it works from the family archives .

archive transcript of the birth of Mina .
  
 birth certificate of Boris.
  
 Grisha 's birth certificate .
  
 Zoe 's birth certificate .

How does a birth certificate can confirm " that this work from the family archive "? <! - ~ 3 ~ ->

[maket]

It's not very difficult to <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

Brozelio - Ming Y. Hesse - Hesse 's sister Raisa , wife of Daniel Hesse. I already wrote that the sisters were married to Brozelio siblings Hesse.

Boris Hessen - the son of Mina Mandelstam and Vladimir Gessen , my grandfather.
Zoe Hesse - my mom . And Gregory - that's me.

Now it happened that a portrait of the family archives ? And then, why would I need to go to Kamensky and meet with Guerra ?

Please, if you are already an expert, it may be better to talk about work , not about provenance ?

[khmelev]

I believe you infinitely , but I believe myself, p.ch. year in '96 with my own eyes I saw this picture - or rather its counterpart , or brother or clone - first at home in a London resident , and later at an auction , where, who, incidentally, was not sold , as I recall .
Then he finally found his master.
MB he just returned to Russia and found , as is the case with orphans , the new home , family and ancestry ?
How else do you explain the existence of the twins is ?
One of them is an impostor. Or perhaps both - "the children of Lieutenant Hesse " <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

[maket]

Сообщение от khmelev

Otherwise, how do you explain such an existence of the twins?

Portraits at first glance identical.
Note that many elements are registered in a different way.
This portrait is not going anywhere - he's always been in the family.

[khmelev]

therefore , it is not a portrait, and yet two. That first - I know who owned it first, and who is later. But this is , excuse me, a military secret . And your only appears now. Correct to put them together and then the truth will certainly be revealed .
Beyond that is the first portrait of the winning score - he came first .
At 20 years earlier.