|
Chatter General discussion. |
|
Опции темы | Опции просмотра |
21.04.2010, 13:51 | Язык оригинала: Русский #161 |
Бывалый
Регистрация: 10.02.2009
Сообщений: 489
Спасибо: 502
Поблагодарили 960 раз(а) в 199 сообщениях
Репутация: 1850
|
LCR, many thanks for the clarification. Now everything is much more understandable.
I offer and I apologize for that, really, based on Artchronika not quite understand - including why they are in one publication "stuck" information immediately about two different events. You are here sovreshenno to do with it! Although one and the other - very useful and interesting exercise. Added after 2 minutes To collectors somehow do not seem good enough to get through. While confident that many of us have our friends-friends (or clients) that we can still send a link to the ongoing online auction. Последний раз редактировалось Lorart; 21.04.2010 в 13:54. Причина: Добавлено сообщение |
21.04.2010, 14:14 | Язык оригинала: Русский #162 | |
Banned
Регистрация: 25.07.2009
Адрес: Россия, Москва
Сообщений: 875
Спасибо: 1,092
Поблагодарили 1,380 раз(а) в 500 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 12
Репутация: 2190
|
Цитата:
1) The artistic level of most represented artist at a charity auction is very low. "On God, that we worthless." 2) There is, at first glance, good work provided by the galleries, but ... buy expensive paintings on photographs 5-10 thousand rubles - is nonsense. Often, the photo in a sort of artist, and nothing but look at reality - and to choose nothing. And vice versa. 3 )........................................... PS Advertising at the auction were a lot, good job the media, even I was attracted to the buyers. But the overall result [until] depressing. Undoubtedly, it was necessary to more carefully select the work to leave behind the level of the street "Vernissage". Sometimes a buyer wants to buy something, and choose and not anything else. suggests that the Administration an interesting marketing trick: introduce one additional lot. It is empty, without pictures. Here, every participant will be able to leave as much money as it sees fit: a thousand rubles, two, ten. Naturally, any auction in this Lot should not be. Anyone who decides to contribute, leaves a record. And everyone should be celebrated (may) pay that amount. Money easily convert bank transfer, even for individuals, not bothering to visit for an unnecessary scene. Thus, participation in the auction could take even those living abroad. And without any problems. Последний раз редактировалось Черномашенцев Владимир; 21.04.2010 в 23:42. |
|
21.04.2010, 14:55 | Язык оригинала: Русский #163 |
Гуру
Регистрация: 28.03.2008
Сообщений: 9,415
Спасибо: 1,532
Поблагодарили 29,853 раз(а) в 6,714 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 10
Репутация: 27271
|
Chernomashentsev Vladimir, I pulled your third paragraph. In my not be in this topic to kick each other.
Charity is voluntary, and say that this charity auction is sluggish, but the picture would have been better then the trade went to more animation - not correct. It is clear that Works by Van Gogh now for 1000 rub. - Auction unfold oh-e-her. But what it will be for charity? And even now, I think too early to worry - quietly goes. We shall live to the end, then we will analyze. Proposal to make an empty lot - interesting, think it over. Although there is reason - why pay money for a pacifier is easier than for any image, even if you do not like. The main thing is the desire to help and not buy in this case. |
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо Konstantin за это полезное сообщение: | fross (21.04.2010) |
21.04.2010, 15:32 | Язык оригинала: Русский #164 | |
Гуру
Регистрация: 24.05.2009
Сообщений: 1,972
Спасибо: 4,937
Поблагодарили 4,308 раз(а) в 1,547 сообщениях
Репутация: 8082
|
Цитата:
In contrast to the "demonstration performances, I just see the problem of excessive publicity of the auction. For example, not every party forum, excluding bravado, want to make everyone else knew what and how much he buys. After a couple of years that the forum works, everything is somehow "familiar". |
|
21.04.2010, 15:51 | Язык оригинала: Русский #165 | |
Гуру
Регистрация: 28.03.2008
Сообщений: 9,415
Спасибо: 1,532
Поблагодарили 29,853 раз(а) в 6,714 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 10
Репутация: 27271
|
Цитата:
|
|
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо Konstantin за это полезное сообщение: | Маруся (21.04.2010) |
21.04.2010, 16:27 | Язык оригинала: Русский #166 | |
Гуру
Регистрация: 24.05.2009
Сообщений: 1,972
Спасибо: 4,937
Поблагодарили 4,308 раз(а) в 1,547 сообщениях
Репутация: 8082
|
Цитата:
Do not buy a work with such comments, simply transfer money to the account. People who donated their work for auction commit the same act of charity, as you do. And sure they do it sincerely. |
|
21.04.2010, 16:38 | Язык оригинала: Русский #167 | |
Banned
Регистрация: 25.07.2009
Адрес: Россия, Москва
Сообщений: 875
Спасибо: 1,092
Поблагодарили 1,380 раз(а) в 500 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 12
Репутация: 2190
|
Цитата:
I, as I could, picked from the fact that it was more or less suitable for my tastes and my financial capabilities. Not the fact that I would buy these paintings in another case. I may be mistaken with a choice, but it can be understood only when I see the originals. But if I keep buying contemporary art, then why not buy it now and it is in this place? On the other hand, if someone has no desire to support its purchase Malaria graphomaniac, you can simply buy for 1000 rubles photo. It is a formal purchase. Also at the auction exhibited a sufficient number of very decent decorative works, do not claim to masterpiece, but it is good for interior decoration. And there are quite inexpensive, from 3 to 10 thousand rubles. PS I will try to formulate a third point more diplomatically: 3) In my personal opinion, the forum is a permanent place of stay of two main categories of participants in the art market: gallery owners, art critics (or "gallery owners?" No, "art-dealers") and an artist. That is, the auction takes place on the web site, the target audience is not morally ready to buy the painting. Some of the intrusive forum regulars suddenly as if on cue disappeared from the site during the auction. Последний раз редактировалось Черномашенцев Владимир; 21.04.2010 в 23:47. |
|
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо Черномашенцев Владимир за это полезное сообщение: | Santa (11.06.2011) |
21.04.2010, 17:38 | Язык оригинала: Русский #168 | |||
Старожил
Регистрация: 12.06.2009
Адрес: московская область
Сообщений: 693
Спасибо: 5,700
Поблагодарили 3,377 раз(а) в 602 сообщениях
Репутация: 6618
|
Цитата:
Цитата:
Цитата:
And by the way, with your purchase, you can not oblagodeteystvovali artist who gave the job up for auction, often affixed prices below market levels, yet something risking The procedure of and in the end, nothing comes as a result of the material terms of this shares. Of course, if the auction may be virtual, but pouchavstvovali statement in announcements artists status of the event would have been higher. It is a pity that this did not happen. Chernomashentsev Vladimir, do not perceive the auction as an opportunity buy for a penny dimes. And think about philanthropy. And it will be easier to part with money. |
|||
21.04.2010, 17:46 | Язык оригинала: Русский #169 | |
Banned
Регистрация: 25.07.2009
Адрес: Россия, Москва
Сообщений: 875
Спасибо: 1,092
Поблагодарили 1,380 раз(а) в 500 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 12
Репутация: 2190
|
Цитата:
"Also at the auction put up a sufficient number of very decent decorative works, do not claim to masterpiece, but it is good for interior decoration." As for your first thoughts, she also came to me in the head. I thought about this and still decided that the lack of artistic selection is well suited for the auction of children's drawings or our politicians. But for the professional art site, this approach is still not good. Последний раз редактировалось Черномашенцев Владимир; 21.04.2010 в 22:24. |
|
Эти 2 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо Черномашенцев Владимир за это полезное сообщение: | L-ana64110 (21.04.2010), Santa (11.06.2011) |
21.04.2010, 17:56 | Язык оригинала: Русский #170 |
Авторитет
Регистрация: 05.08.2008
Сообщений: 893
Спасибо: 3,858
Поблагодарили 1,909 раз(а) в 376 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 1
Репутация: 3163
|
Chernomashentsev Vladimir, was about you a much better opinion ... If you're picking on us his "bad mood" that I venture to suggest - do not do this and apologize to all the artists - who were much more generous and more generous.
Position "collector" does not allow you to decry the work of others and others' contribution. If you could not choose to your taste - no one asks you to buy it and ask you to consider that good is not loud and certainly not with more-scandalous performances. |
|
|
Похожие темы | ||||
Тема | Автор | Разделы | Ответов | Последние сообщения |
Sotheby's March 25 in New York | ФАИв | Auctions | 1 | 17.03.2010 15:23 |
March 12, in Holland in the 23rd time opened TEFAF | Евгений | Auctions | 1 | 13.03.2010 10:22 |
Empire, Numismatics and Used books on March 28 | Imperia | Auctions | 4 | 02.04.2009 13:40 |
Sovkom March 25, 2009 | Кирилл Сызранский | Auctions | 1 | 26.03.2009 11:17 |
Russian Americans at Christie's on March 11 | Vladimir | Auctions | 0 | 11.03.2009 16:21 |
|