Forgery paintings Burliuk at Four Corners

[uriart]

Yes, it was with the work of another author, and not Burliuk.
And after checking with other expert organizations are confirmed. Works were left.


Counterfeiters Burliuk in life?
With his work were worth big money?
Especially in the 60's or 90's, to his work in general was not much interest.
Interest started you know when.

[Синица]

OlegTsi, Hello!
It seemed to me that you feel works well Burliuk.
I have two of his works.
One small bought at Sotheby's, because "Self-Portrait.
The experts did not address - the hand had not reached.
How do you think?
Burliuk?

[ранжер]

OlegTsi, do not tell us more about the picture number 2 of the message 6?

[OlegTsi]

Tit, my opinion - this is not a self-portrait, this is a mistake in the inventory of paintings by the originator Sotheby's catalog. I have seen instances of such errors instead of the date 1927 on the work Burliuk put 1972 ... But this portrait - certainly work Burliuk.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 9 minutes[/color]
ranzher, but what would you like to hear about it? Excellent work, the museum's plan is precisely perfectly represents transition period in the artist from the period before the Japanese American. Work big painted on sewn canvas in two parts (the seam is almost diagonally).

[color="# 666686"]Added after 25 minutes[/color]
uriart, in the late 40's, early 50's his work (simple, not a masterpiece) sold from 50 to 150 dollars. For example, in the late 40's for rent 3 bedroom apartment in lower Manhattan (the center of New York) cost 55 dollar a month. Custom portraits were more expensive. In the 60 years at ACA Gallery has sold for 900 dollars and rent the same apartment was no more than $ 150.

[ранжер]

Сообщение от OlegTsi

ranzher, and what would you like to hear about it? Excellent work, the museum's plan is precisely perfectly represents transition period in the artist from the period before the Japanese American. Work big painted on sewn canvas in two parts (the seam is almost diagonally).

Yes, I would like to know how they say now history paintings existence, from creation to the present. By the way, as its name? In addition you write about specific formats Burliuk. How does this picture fit in this concept?

[Vladimir]

Сообщение от OlegTsi

uriart, in the late 40's, early 50's his work (simple, not a masterpiece) sold from 50 to 150 dollars. For example, in the late 40's for rent 3 bedroom apartment in lower Manhattan (the center of New York) cost 55 dollar a month.

Can I say that in terms of current money of Burliuk in 40-ies were worth 2.6 thousand dollars at an average salary of $ 3 thousand conditionally?

[OlegTsi]

ranzher, in most cases, expensive work have their own history, they just do not appear out of nowhere. Given that it produced about 18 thousand paintings, many of them were from people who directly or indirectly knew Burliuk. Time has passed not so many, many more lives, live their children. So with the stories 9provenansom) no big problems. Gallery Lyzon and ASA for some time, exclusively represented the interests of Burliuk, in such jobs always have appropriate labels. Often Burlyuk placed important work in the Journal Color and Rhyme, which is produced along Marusia s wife.

Painting with the workers and called - Working.

The format of pictures, which you asked, try to answer the words of the Burliuk - translate:

"... Born in the Ukrainian steppes, I was always inclined mostly to horizontal format, and only recently, probably under the influence of the country hmarochesov, I increasingly have a vertical format." The manuscript is preserved in the State Public Library in St. Petersburg, ottdel manuscripts. fax. 552. Number 1.

[color="# 666686"]Posted 10 minutes[/color]
Vladimir, yes, I think you are right, if we take the same apartment - that today is worth renting 2,5-3 thousand per month. It depends on how that is recalculated, but in principle it is. But if you take the same picture, which cost 50 dollars then, but now it costs thousands 15-20-30

In 1958, one of menadzherov General Electric Company acquired a painting by Picasso for 30 thousand dollars. Then he could buy for the money 2 luxurious home, which today would cost about 3 million The same picture was sold at Sotheby's several years ago for a record price for a Picasso - 104 million - Boy with a Pipe. It's like comparing ...

[ранжер]

That is, in other words, you do not know where is this picture?
And that, for this painting means a road work? What is its price?
Vertical format pictures "Workers" must be understood arose "under the influence of the country hmarochesov"?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от OlegTsi

In 1958, one of menadzherov General Electric Company acquired a painting by Picasso for 30 thousand dollars. Then he could buy for the money 2 luxurious home, which today would cost about 3 million The same picture was sold at Sotheby's several years ago for a record price for a Picasso - 104 million - Boy with a Pipe. It's like comparing ...

Class example! Thank you!

[Синица]

Сообщение от OlegTsi

But this portrait - certainly work Burliuk.

And thanks for that!